Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 304 results (1.013 seconds)Kuldip Nayar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-22-2006
Reported in : AIR2006SC3127; JT2006(8)SC1; 2006(8)SCALE257; (2006)7SCC1
..... rp act 1951 61 article 368 relates to power of parliament to amend the constitution and the procedure therefore the proviso in question puts limits on the power of parliament to amend the constitution article 368 to the extent ..... electorate does not prevail over that of a majority 33 in india article 80 of the constitution of india prescribes the composition of the rajya sabha the maximum strength .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNimmaka Jayaraju Vs. Chief Minister of A.P. and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-02-2006
Reported in : 2006(5)ALT661
..... constitution of india the president of india in exercise of powers under article 342 1 notified constitution scheduled tribes order 1950 which as amended by parliament under article ..... procedure ..... parliament therefore ..... parliament would be able to understand it are unfounded if the historical background the preamble the entire scheme of the constitution the relevant provisions there of including article 368 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKerala Samsthana Chethu Thozhilali Union Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-24-2006
Reported in : AIR2006SC3480; JT2006(5)SC41; 2006(2)KLT270(SC); (2006)IILLJ529SC; 2006(3)SCALE534; (2006)4SCC327
..... power of amendment conferred by article 368 cannot extend to scrapping of the constitution or to altering the basic structure of the constitution ..... by a resolution of parliament does not confer any immunity ..... with respect to the procedure adopted the form or ..... therefore is in conformity with the provisions thereof 23 reference to the provisions of articles 39 42 and 43 of the constitution of india .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVasu Dev Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-07-2006
Reported in : (2006)144PLR802; 2006(11)SCALE108
..... power of amendment conferred by article 368 cannot extend to scrapping of the constitution or to altering the basic structure of the constitution ..... urban reforms policy of government of india therefore the balance of rights would be ..... approval by a resolution of parliament does not confer any immunity to ..... rent tribunal on an all india basis with quicker procedure should be examined this has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProf. M.M. Agrawal Department of Sanskrit University of Delhi Vs. Vice ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-09-2006
Reported in : 126(2006)DLT433; 2006(86)DRJ412
dismissed delhi university act 1922statute 37 r w article 226 constitution of india mandamus seniority interpretation question of seniority is to university act 1922statute 37 r w article 226 constitution of india mandamus seniority interpretation question of seniority is to be determined appeal is dismissed delhi university act 1922statute 37 r w article 226 constitution of india mandamus seniority interpretation question of seniority to hold an office or be a member of any authority of the university by rotation according to seniority such seniority
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAboobacker Vs. District Collector
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-21-2006
Reported in : 2006(3)KLT670
of the court fees act 1870 section 16 of the indian court fees act 1870 as stood was repealed the present amended qualifications prescribed by special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without retrospective effect mohanan k referred to in section 89 of the code of civil procedure 1908 5 of 1908 the plaintiff shall be entitled to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhaskaran Nair Vs. Abdul Kareem
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-25-2006
Reported in : II(2007)BC330; 2006(4)KarLJ48
apply unless a the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on courts below is not sufficient justification for invoking the revisional powers the conscience of the court must be satisfied that there special rules 1999 unfilled vacancy that had arisen prior to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications mind to the question whether the alleged infraction of the procedure has resulted in miscarriage of justice 10 in the instant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaiju Vs. Valsala
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-23-2006
Reported in : 2006(4)KLT252
amended qualifications prescribed by special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without retrospective effect mohanan k order passed under chapter ix of the code of criminal procedure 1973 2 of 1974 provided that nothing in this sub
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnoop Vs. State of Kerala
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-12-2006
Reported in : 2007CriLJ2968; 2006(3)KLT711
attract a deterrent substantive sentence of imprisonment the pride of india is that its democratic structure has been maintained without any amended qualifications prescribed by special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without duties in relation to election at that booth for the parliamentary election have conducted themselves in a most irresponsible and objectionable special rules 1999 unfilled vacancy that had arisen prior to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications a prosecution under section 171 f of the indian penal code the prosecution alleged that the petitioner appeared before the officers
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThomas Vs. Florance
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-27-2006
Reported in : AIR2007Ker31; 2006(3)KLT717
amended qualifications prescribed by special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without retrospective effect mohanan k part of the property 3 section 6 of the civil procedure code deals with the pecuniary jurisdiction which reads as follows
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT