Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: delhi Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.193 seconds)Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shyam Lal Saraf (Also Shyam L ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-09-1992
Reported in : (1993)46TTJ(Del)385
appeal a substantial reduction being effected by the first appellate authority both the parties are aggrieved the revenue in respect of exigible the nature of penalty proceedings continues to be quasi criminal and existence of means read or guilty mind is to circumstances of the case alleged amount represented payment to self thereforee penalty is not leviable held the addition of rs 1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarshad S. Mehta Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-01-1992
Reported in : 1992(24)DRJ392; ILR1993Delhi274
it was held that police authorities were required under the constitutional mandate to produce an arrested person before a judicial magistrate of lt col prithi pal singh bedi v union of india and others 1983crilj647 keeping this principle in mind we have magistrate within 24 hours of the arrest as required by article 22 of the constitution of india thereforee it was held mandate given in this section the court can exercise the power under section 267 only for the purpose of asking him 17 from this we can infer the mind of the parliament prior to the amendment of the code under the old in criminal courts on the objects and reasons for this amendment clearly points out the mind of the legislature but he court for example case under section 145 and 146 criminal procedure code are neither inquiry nor trial such cases are in cr p c after the charge sheet having been submitted thereforee the court opined that it was to be seen whether
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJayshree Ravi and Another Vs. University of Delhi and Another
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-14-1992
Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ303
which include mandates not only in chapter 111 of the constitution but any other articles of the constitution i am unable no order as to costs 76 order accordingly contitution of india 1950 art 14 admission to llb admission through competitive examination only in chapter 111 of the constitution but any other articles of the constitution i am unable to concede such absolute unable to wage a legal battle against a strong and powerful opponent who is exploiting him both the central government and observance of various social welfare and labour laws enacted by parliament for the purpose of securing to the workmen a life not arbitrary fanciful or oppressive otherwise it should be no procedure at all and the requirement of art 21 would not him both the central government and the state government are thereforee bound to ensure observance of various social welfare and labour
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTexma Co. Ltd. Vs. Ram Dhan and anr.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-28-1992
Reported in : 47(1992)DLT249; [1992(65)FLR742]; (1993)IIILLJ208Del
was held to be vocative of article 19 of the constitution the following passage s may be quoted herein in british refer to the express newspaper private ltd v union of india 1961 illj339sc where a short minimum for voluntary retirement or gratuity on voluntary resignation was held to be vocative of article 19 of the constitution the following passage s may be undertaking given by them in my judgment exercise of discretionary power in favor of such petitioners would lead to chaos in ble supreme court during the pendency of the appeal the amended provisions came into force with effect from 1 10 1987 the order is in flagrant disregard of the rules of procedure the high court would thereforee interfere in the exercise of vacate the quarters of the company as allotted to themand thereforee withholding of the gratuity was justified the controlling authority observed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.K. SarIn Vs. Pigott Champman and Co.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-03-1992
Reported in : AIR1992Delhi362; 46(1992)DLT352; 1992(22)DRJ471; 1992RLR139
115 civil procedure code or under article 227 of the constitution of india if we interpret the provision of section 25b he has retired as addl secretary to the govt of india on 30 6 1991 and has to surrender the govt 306 that the section 115 civil procedure code or under article 227 of the constitution of india if we interpret the cannot be the intention of the legislature to give unbridled power to the controller in the matter of grant of leave leave to defend on the limited ground 7 by the amending act 57 of 1988 some more classes of landlords have 1979 r l r 306 that the section 115 civil procedure code or under article 227 of the constitution of india leave to defend has resulted in miscarriage of justice and thereforee i accept tis revision petition and set aside the order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industri ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-31-1992
Reported in : 47(1992)DLT324; (1994)IILLJ83Del
is no scope for interference under article 226 of the constitution of india 34 the next contention which is sought to mills co case and the firestone tyre rubber co of india p ltd case the decision in cooperengineering ltd case merely supreme court held that in exercise of its jurisdiction under article 226 the high court does not sit asa court of should not be limited and thatthe tribunal should have the power in cases wherever necessary to set aside the order of no change has been effected in the section by the amendment act it has been held by this court that evenin were justified now the question as to what is the procedure to be followed by the industrial tribunal when such a an adversary system which these quasi judicial tribunals have adopted thereforee it is crystal clear that the rights which the employer
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeneral Marketing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-14-1992
Reported in : 1992(22)DRJ286
for appointment of arbitrator within two months the union of india could not amend the contract unilaterally it could not for is said on whether the union of india had any power to unilaterally correct the error mercifully she does notice the in all these communications protest was lodged against the unilateral amendment the letter of december 8 1973 particularly shows that the currency of the rate contract the customs authorities revise the procedure of assessment of customs duty and issue fresh assessment orders even after november 15 1972 supplies continued to be made thereforee by this conduct the claimant also acted upon the above
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagan Nath Vs. Har Lal and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-1992
Reported in : 46(1992)DLT644
customs act 1962 section 2 3 baggage goods detained under constitution of india art 226 writ petition against charges claimed for the goods liable for confiscation under the customs act in india 4 the petitioner approached the assistant collector of customs preventive y k sabharwal j 1 this petition under article 227 is directed against the order of the competent authority issued by the second respondent in the exercise of his powers conferred by the customs act the second respondent did not public notice also otherwise fails if henceforth the first respondent amends its regulations to include baggage as well there will be has worked up the charges due from the petitioner in civil writ no 1197 89 and these amount to rs 6 by the airports authority the first respondent 14 we are thereforee of the opinion that the first respondent is not entitled
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOriental Express Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Usha Pasricha
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-01-1992
Reported in : 49(1993)DLT155; 1993(25)DRJ396; 1993RLR45
a judgment within the meaning of article 14 of the constitution of india and is thus not binding the argument proceeds within the meaning of article 14 of the constitution of india and is thus not binding the argument proceeds on the bhargava supra was not a judgment within the meaning of article 14 of the constitution of india and is thus not account of having been passed by a court without inherent jurisdiction the mere fact that the judgment in pankaj bhargava s far back as on 23 8 84 by moving an amendment application on 1 2 91 at the fag end of of the delhi rent control act constitute a self contained code that being so judgments in regard to the competence of in terms of the agreement between the partics 14 i thereforee on consideration of the arguments in respect to construction of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. Surinderjit and Others Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-17-1992
Reported in : AIR1993Delhi130; 1992(24)DRJ237
have filed this writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking mandamus and direction to delhi development authority but the mother cancelled her tickets and remained behind in india the husband thereupon started procededings before the high court of are four in number have filed this writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking mandamus and direction issue show cause notice and opportunity of hearing while exercising power under section 31 a of the act by the authority seal any building on its whims and fancy without following procedure prescribed under law complying with principles of natural justice the and the ndmc the building bye laws of dda are thereforee not applicable to the property in question 4 on 10
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT