Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 1974 Page 1 of about 301 results (1.846 seconds)Ghousia Begum Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-06-1974
Reported in : AIR1975Mad345
..... article 368 lays down how an amendment of the constitution may be made and reads 368 2 an amendment of this constitution may be initiated only by the introduction of a bill for the purpose in either house of parliament ..... the code of civil procedure therefore it is not open for her to ..... power to administer that territory does not include the power to acquire land for the purpose of the union of india .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. N.S. and North Malabar Public Conveyanc ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-27-1974
Reported in : [1976]102ITR36(Ker)
well as the tribunal it is unnecessary to consider the scope and ambit of sub section 1 of section 52 though and consequently arose from the order of the tribunal we therefore reframe the question referred to us as follows whether on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Veerabahu Pattar Vs. P. Eswara Pillai
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-07-1974
Reported in : AIR1975Mad171
rights and held that such a deed of assignment would constitute a valid acknowledgment and save the suit from the bar 1962 1scr140 and l c mills v aluminium corporation of india 1971 2scr623 it was held in these decisions that a the mortgage and the liability to be redeemed 7 the scope of section 19 of the limitation act 1908 itself was in favour of sakkiarnma pillai amounts to an acknowledgment and therefore the suit is in time there is no dispute that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSakhi Mohd. Vs. State
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-22-1974
Reported in : 1974RLR321
jama masjid delhi situated within the local limits of my jurisdiction and thereforee 1 k n bose s d m darya the jurisdiction provided by section 145 4 of the criminal procedure code hereafter called the code in the course of examining delhi situated within the local limits of my jurisdiction and thereforee 1 k n bose s d m darya ganj hereby
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSouth India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bom ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-29-1974
Reported in : [1977]106ITR969(Bom)
observed that rule 3 b of the schedule to the indian income tax act 1922 did not empower the income tax item claimed as an item of loss would be within power of income tax officer to adjust by way of disallowing loss resulting from devaluation the tribunal was of the view therefore that this was an imaginary loss to which the assessee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVinaya Chandra Misra Vs. Sachindra Kumar Sarkar
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-10-1974
Reported in : 1974CriLJ962
..... article 215 of the constitution to take cognizance of the contempts of the subordinate court as well and section 10 of the 1971 act recognised that power it was therefore ..... procedure ..... article 225 confers a power on the parliament to enact a law restricting the power ..... india ..... 368 ..... constitutional sanction behind it and that the power cannot be done away with except through an amendment of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBalukishan A. Devidaval Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-19-1974
Reported in : 1975CriLJ1891
the code of criminal procedure at the commencement of the constitution in the concurrent list iii of schedule vii the constitution police officer within the meaning of section 25 of the indian evidence act and that a statement made by an accused 14 of the code would render section 9 ultra vires article 20 3 of the constitution of india and article 14 the enquiry to be conducted under section 8 1 the powers of the police invested in the officers of the railway the railway stores unlawful possession act 1955 enacted by the parliament for the extension of the law relating to the punishment given to the accused as the whole purpose of the amendment of the criminal procedure code in 1956 was to expedite of his investigation under the abkari act or the criminal procedure code is inadmissible in evidence it seems to me a clothed with all the powers of the police officer and therefore he is a police officer within the meaning of section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSamsher Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-23-1974
Reported in : AIR1974SC2192; (1974)IILLJ465SC; (1974)2SCC831; [1975]1SCR814; 1975(1)SLJ1(SC)
failed to act in terms of the provisions of the constitution and abdicated the control by not having an inquiry through for convenient transaction of the business of the government of india or the government of the state respectively or by allocation overriding power conferred upon the president or the governor under article 310 as qualified by article 311 proposition no 5 is namely to entrust functions relating to matters to which executive power of the union extends to officers named in the notification shape among the post independence generation of students in school parliaments and university replicas almost all political parties have at least imagine that it was to be so strictly interpreted that amendments and radical revisions would be constantly required to keep government supra is that a law can be framed prescribing the procedure by which and the authority by whom the said pleasure chief minister without the formal approval of the governor is therefore untenable the order is the order of the governor 83
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJanardan Prasad Gupta Vs. O.P. Chakarvarty and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-05-1974
Reported in : 1975CriLJ164
215 the supreme court or a high court have the constitutional power to punish for contempt and therefore they have the on its own motion because being the highest court in india or in a state as the case may be the the supreme court or a high court clause 2 of article 142 deals with the powers of the supreme court to including the power to punish for contempt of itself these powers cannot be taken away by parliamentary legislation except by way right of a citizen to bring vexatious actions without control parliament thought that a restraint or check should be placed upon cannot take away the power to punish without a constitutional amendment but it would be untenable to say that it cannot magistrates or other persons acting judicially section 17 deals with procedure after cognizance has been taken under section 15 section 18 there is non compliance with the three alternative procedural requirements therefore the petition must be ordered to stand dismissed without going
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhola Nath Kesari Vs. Director of State Lotteries and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-22-1974
Reported in : [1974]95ITR171(All)
it is clear therefore that the word income in the constitution cannot be restricted to the meaning of its term in profits tax amendment act xxii of 1947 which amended the indian income tax act by enlarging the definition of the term that tax on lotteries is discriminatory and is hit by article 14 of the constitution the argument is that the tax a single statute matters which call for the exercise of power under two or more entries in the union list 18 government of a state also does not confer power on parliament to levy tax on lotteries it can pass other laws further observed that the income tax and excess profits tax amendment act xxii of 1947 which amended the indian income tax was foreign to the income tax act it is clear therefore that the word income in the constitution cannot be restricted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT