Confusing - Year 2012 - Judgments

May 18 2012 (HC)

United Biotech Pvt. Ltd Vs. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd a ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-18-2012

..... cursory observation in the marketplace that will or will not lead to a likelihood of confusion not the impression created from a meticulous comparison as expressed in carefully weighed analysis ..... that purchasers may be sophisticated or discriminating is not sufficient to preclude the likelihood of confusion being skilled in their own art does not necessarily preclude their mistaking one trademark .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 2012 (HC)

The Himalaya Drug Company Vs. M/S. S.B.L. Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

..... does not satisfy the requirement of showing either likelihood of confusion of the actual deception the reasons given in the judgment ..... and lakshmandhara is in our opinion likely to deceive or cause confusion we must consider the overall similarity of the two composite ..... at the conclusion that there was no reasonable apprehension of confusion or deception was as we have earlier stated that there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2012 (HC)

M/S Bhagwan Dass Khanna Jewellers Vs. Bhagwan Das Khanna Jewellers Pvt ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-10-2012

..... affidavit further affirmed that the above mentioned incident is one of the several cases of confusion and the problems arising therefrom due to deceptively similar names of the plaintiff firm and ..... closely resembling that in which another carries on business is calculated to deceive or cause confusion between the two businesses and to affect property by diverting customers to the person taking .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 2012 (HC)

Dabur India Limited Vs. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-02-2012

..... by arriving at a conclusion whether the infringed goods are confusingly similar in colour combination get up lay out printed over ..... services which already belongs to someone else it results in confusion and has propensity of diverting the customers and clients of ..... court further observed that 8220 where there is probability of confusion in business an injunction will be granted even though the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 04 2012 (HC)

Guru Kripa Manufacturing Private Ltd. Vs. M/S. Duro Pipe Industries Pr ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-04-2012

..... and defendants are quite different therefore there is absolutely no chance or possibility or any confusion and deception amongst the consumers of the plaintiffs product and the defendants goods which they ..... between the competing marks and to determine whether there is likelihood of deception or causing confusion the supreme court considering the binding precedent in amritdhara s case supra and durga .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 2012 (HC)

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd., and Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-10-2012

..... combined word ldquo baharatmatrimony or the individual words ldquo bharat and matrimony which results in confusion deception and diversion of business traffic 12 that apart the case of the appellant is ..... with the mark ldquo eenadu rdquo in the state of andhra pradesh would definitely create confusion in the minds of the consumers because the appellant is selling agarbattis marked ldquo eenadu .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2012 (HC)

Subhash Chand Bansal Vs. Khadimand#8217;s and Another

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2012

..... own departmental stores and therefore there is no possibility of any confusion amongst public it is further alleged that the sale of the ..... mark enjoys it is also likely to create at least initial confusion in the mind of a consumer with average intelligence and ..... colour of packing being different there was likelihood of deception and confusion on account of phonetic similarity of the word 8220 panchhi .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 2012 (HC)

itm Trust and Others Vs. Educate India Society

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-20-2012

..... plaintiff s registered trademark as is likely to deceive or cause confusion in relation to which it has been registered as held ..... plaintiff s registered trademark as is likely to deceive or cause confusion in relation to the services in respect of which it ..... present era the students seeking admission for higher education would be confused or deceived by any similarities in the trademarks of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 2012 (TRI)

Merck Limited Vs. M/S. Jupiter Pharmaceuticals Limited and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Apr-20-2012

..... expenditure and they contended that the overall effect of the two marks would result in confusion the respondent also produced evidence to show their sales and advertisement materials and contended that ..... cause confusion therefore the mere passage of time cannot exclude the possibility of likelihood of confusion he mainly urged that the matter be remanded back to enable the registrar to consider .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2012 (TRI)

Titan Industries Limited Vs. Fuchs Mineraloelwerke Gmbh and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Apr-04-2012

..... reputation and goodwill among the public the respondents registration if granted would definitely lead to confusion and deception as the marks are deceptively similar the public and the trade will definitely ..... mark therefore cannot be said to have acquired distinctiveness by use 31 the issue regarding confusion and deception has to be satisfied by the respondents in an opposition proceedings the onus .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Confusing - Judgment Search Results