Confusing - Judgment Search Results

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Chennai

..... question whether key word banner advertising results in trademark dilution or creates a likelihood of confusion that leads to infringement has come up in several jurisdictions two of the earliest ..... protection act directed at preventing the cybersquatting on the internet of domain names that are confusingly similar to trademarks and person names 6 legislation in 2002 implementing the provisions of .....

Himalaya Drug Co. Vs Sbl Limited

Court: Delhi

..... prescription or only to physicians cannot by itself be considered as sufficient protection against confusion according to the plaintiff in view of the varying infrastructure for supervision of physicians ..... medicines the plaintiff urges that public interest supports a lesser degree of proof showing confusing similarity in case of a trademark in respect of medicinal products against non medicinal .....

M/S. Takkar (India) Tea Company Vs Soongachi Tea Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

..... in my opinion matter which is disclaimed is not necessarily disregarded when question of possible confusion or deception of the public as distinct from the extent of a proprietors exclusive ..... regional or non english language equivalent of marks containing english words might cause deception and confusion in hudnut an application was made for registration of the mark derniere touche for perfumes .....

The Gramophone Company of India Ltd Vs Super Cassette Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

..... selling the version recordings produced by them to submit that they are highly misleading and confusing he submits that the packaging and labels used by the defendants prominently display the names ..... held that the plaintiff should not have been required to provide evidence of actual consumer confusion and remanded back the matter for taking further proceedings consistent with its opinion in the .....

Shelke Bevarages Private Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Compani ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2010)112BOMLR1479,LC2010(1)313

..... the mind of the purchasers and furthermore that the defendants goods have misrepresented or confused such purchasers leading them to believe that oxycool packaged drinking water offered by the ..... are actually infringing the trade mark exclusively owned by the plaintiffs causing deception and confusion amongst the public and losses to the plaintiffs grant of injunction is judicial exercise .....

Shakti Electricals (P) Ltd., Vs. New Shakti Radios and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... impugned trade mark of the respondent no 1 is deceptively similar to cause deception and confusion amongst the consumers relying on the judgment in aktiebolaget skf v rajesh engineering corporation ..... also in view of the fact whether an average person with imperfect recollection would be confused the appellate board held that the rival marks were visually phonetically and structurally deceptively .....

Rohtas Goel and anr. Vs. Somay Nayak and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... of space in the projects developed by plaintiff no 2 getting confused on account of similarity of names and going in for ..... goods manufactured or sold by the parties test of deception or confusion amongst the consumers did not arise noticing that the name ..... some other manufacturer can by clever manipulations and machinations deceive or confuse the customer into buying a product that he does not .....

Rohitas Goel and anr. Vs. Somaya Nayak and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... of space in the projects developed by plaintiff no 2 getting confused on account of similarity of names and going in for ..... goods manufactured or sold by the parties test of deception or confusion amongst the consumers did not arise noticing that the name ..... some other manufacturer can by clever manipulations and machinations deceive or confuse the customer into buying a product that he does not .....

M/S. Bansal Brothers Vs. M/S. Kanahya Lal Satish Kumar

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... hence no question of any likelihood of deception or causing of confusion amongst the consumers can arise in this case he further ..... claims cannot be accepted to buttress his submission in relation to confusion and deception and the onus to prove lies on the ..... uncooked dal pulse therefore there is likelihood of causing deception or confusion among the consumers when the marks and goods are identical .....

Skol Breweries Vs Unisafe Technologies.

Court: Delhi

..... the defendant of their name harrodian school would lead to confusion among the public that they were misrepresenting themselves as being ..... puma ag 1998 rpc 199 as follows the likelihood of confusion must therefore be appreciated globally taking into account all factors ..... any evidence to show that there was likelihood of consumer confusion or that the defendant knowing the plaintiffs mark deliberately .....