Confusing - Judgment Search Results

Wockhardt Limited Vs. Aristo Pharmaceuticals Limited

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1999)2MLJ467

..... it is now well settled that the court while considering likelihood of deception or confusion must make allowance for imperfect recollection and the effect of careless pronounciation and speech ..... prescription has been taken into consideration for deciding whether there was no likelihood of confusion being created the marks were not visually phonetically and structurally similar in the instant .....

Godavari Match Industries, Mamasapuram by Its Proprietor and 4 Others ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2000)1MLJ556

..... of the plaintiff s trade mark which is likely to cause confusion in the mind of an unwary purchaser the plaintiffcannot succeed since ..... question lease such an impression that they are likely to cause confusion of deception in relation to the customer s recollection of the ..... particular party whose trade mark is likely to deceive or cause confusion the object of maintaining a trade mark register is that .....

Jones Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... error occurred the proper standard for reviewing claims that allegedly ambiguous instructions caused jury confusion is whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury applied the challenged instruction ..... nor did the decision forms or their accompanying instructions create a reasonable likelihood of confusion over the effect of nonunanimity the district court s explicit instruction that the .....

Haji Latif Gani Kachhi Vs. Sangishetty Ramulu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1999)3MLJ604

..... that the trade mark sought for by the respondent would cause confusion in the minds of the users 10 heard both sides 11 ..... resembles that other mark as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion 12 to support and substantiate his contention the learned advocate for ..... anr air1972cal261 wherein it has been held that a question of confusion of deception cannot be decided by comparting the two marks by .....

Haroon M. Adam Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in: (2001)121STC134Tribunal

..... the main application and the affidavit in reply were under a confusion as to the correct position 16 the sub headings referred to ..... him such similar appearance of both classes of sugar will create confusion in the matter of taxation but in our view the apprehension ..... sugar is tax free therefore there is no possibility of any confusion mr chakraborty hinted that may be that the applicant is importing .....

Honda Motor Company Limited Vs. Kewal Brothers and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2002(25)PTC763(Cal)

..... the defendant is irresistibly concluded he argues once the deception and confusion amongst the consumers is established the injunction in case of ..... by the learned judge that there was possibility of deception and confusion 29 similar was the situation in case of allergan inc ..... my view there is hardly any scope for deception and or confusion as the plaintiffs product is motor car and motor cycle .....

Amar Suitings Ltd. Vs. Amar Syntex Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2000)124PLR531

..... resembles that other mark as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion 7 section 106 of the act provides the various forms of ..... being common to both the marks as to be likely to cause confusion or deception among a substantial number of persons a single judge ..... that the two names are deceptively similar and are likely to cause confusion their lordships of the supreme court upheld the judgment of the .....

Weeks Vs. Angelone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... an aggravator had been proved it is of critical importance in understanding the jury s confusion that the instructions failed to inform the jury that mitigating evidence serves this dual purpose ..... the jurors asked this question about that instruction demonstrates beyond peradventure that the instruction had confused them there would have been no reason to ask the question if they had understood .....

Friends of Earth, Inc. Vs. Laidlaw Environmental Services (Toc), Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for wholly past violations in relying on steel co the court of appeals confused mootness with standing the confusion is understandable given this court s repeated statements that the doctrine of mootness ..... attempts to frame its exposition as a corrective to the fourth circuit which it claims confused mootness with standing ante at 189 the fourth circuit s conclusion of nonjusticiability rested upon .....

Dr. R. Murali Vs. Dr. R. Kamalakkannan and Three Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1999(3)CTC675; (2000)1MLJ1

..... such cases learned counsel also submitted that reservation under the constitution is not to be confused with the reservation when the government takes a policy decision as a source of admission ..... a prospectus with regard to admission to educational courses he shall not mix up and confuse the prospectus as understood is company law parlance with the prospectus for educational courses prospectus .....