Confusing - Judgment Search Results

Clark Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... itself subject to controversy the risks are even greater that opinions about mental disease may confuse a jury into thinking the opinions show more than they do because allowing mental disease ..... moral constructs such as free will these impermissible leaps in logic made by expert witnesses confuse the jury this state of affairs does considerable injustice to psychiatry and we believe possibly .....

Ayers Vs. Belmontes

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mitigating evidence in concluding otherwise the ninth circuit cited juror queries as evidence of confusion assuming that interpretation is correct the court s conclusion that a juror likely ignored ..... respondent was sentenced however before easley rewrote factor k and before skipper resolved the confusion over whether states had the constitutional latitude to restrict evidence that did not tend .....

Uttamchand P. JaIn Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)103ITD1(Mum.)

..... it was stated that the statement was given under the state of confusion and as per the direction of the it authorities vi shri ..... his retraction stating that the later statement was given under influence and confused state of mind 15 though the cit a referred to both ..... ans yes at the time of survey i was totally state of confusion in a however under mental pressure the statement was recorded which .....

Apex Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Zuventus Health Care Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2007)1MLJ657; 2006(33)PTC492(Mad)

..... sold under prescriptionor only to physicians cannot by itself be considered a sufficient protection against confusion the physicians and pharmacists are trained people yet they are not infallible and in ..... and with high degree of possibility of even accidental negligence strict measures to prevent any confusion arising from similarity of marks among medicines are required to be taken and for .....

Hindustan Pencils Limited Vs. J.N. Ghosh and Bros. Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: LC2007(1)41; 2007(34)PTC49(Del)

..... imitation of the plaintiff s trade mark nataraj intending to confuse the customers present action has been initiated praying that defendant ..... services which already belongs to someone else it results in confusion and has propensity of diverting the customers and clients of ..... of mind of public in deciding whether it will be confused applying the test of misrepresentation the learned single judge .....

Allergan Inc Vs. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2006)2CALLT272(HC),2006(2)CHN179,2006(32)PTC495(Cal)

..... of trade the mark ocuflox or any other deceptively and or confusingly similar mark and also for further necessary action against the defendant ..... for treatment of eyes only as such if the customer is confused and identified a wrong product then there is every likelihood ..... any doubt that utmost precaution should be taken to prevent any confusion in the mind of the customer regarding the actual product .....

Pankaj Jaiswal and anr. Vs. Virendra Prasad Jaiswal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2007(1)CHN143,2007(35)PTC761(Cal)

..... are buying the products of the plaintiff respondent thereby causing confusion and deception 7 such mala fide intention is also apparent ..... the date of the proceedings where there is probability of confusion in business an injunction will be granted even though the ..... services which already belongs to someone else it results in confusion and has propensity of diverting the customers and clients of .....

P.P. Jewellers (P) Ltd., P.P. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)111TTJ(Delhi)187

..... from the different premises situated at different places and since there was no ambiguity or confusion about the search operations conducted in their cases at respective premises the omission of the ..... their conduct during the course of the said proceedings sufficiently shows that there was no confusion whatsoever in their mind about the fact that the search operation was initiated and conducted .....

Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Delhi Press Samachar Patra (P.)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)101ITD253(Delhi)

..... the assessing officer examined this point from the documents furnished by the assessee perhaps this confusion would have not arisen 9 the second reason given by the assessing officer in denying ..... the assessing officer examined this point from the documents furnished by the assessee perhaps this confusion would have not arisen b as regards disproportionate expenses of ink in different units the .....

Bala Arichandra Tex, Represented by Its Partners, Vs. Bharat Arichandr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2006)2MLJ839

..... trade mark used by the defendants is sufficient enough to cause great confusion with that of the plaintiff hence there is no need to interfere ..... whether the infringement is such as is likely to deceive or cause confusion the gist of the action for passing off is that the ..... s goods has become distinctive and that there is a possibility of confusion between them and the goods of the defendant no case of .....