Confusing - Judgment Search Results

B. Rosaiah Vs. F. Hoffman La Roche Ag

Court: Trademark

Reported in: (2002)(25)PTC134Reg

..... prescription of a registered medical practitioner therefore there is absolutely no possibility of any confusion cadila health care ltd v cadila pharmaceuticals ltd though the hon ble supreme court ..... of medicinal product as against other non medicinal products drugs are poisons not sweets confusion between medicinal products may therefore be life threatening not merely inconvenient noting the frailty .....

Mahendra and Mahendra Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2003)2GLR1024; 2003(26)PTC434(Guj)

..... deceptively similar to the plaintiffs name and is likely to cause confusion and suggest connection or association of the defendant with the ..... defendant in all probability with reasonable possibility and is likely to confuse the public the use of words mahendra and mahendra by ..... name mahindra and mahindra the public at large is likely to confuse the business of the defendant as that of the plaintiff .....

Fourts (India) Laboratories Vs. Gufic Private Limited

Court: Trademark

Reported in: (2003)(26)PTC367Reg

..... given by the registered medical practitioner hence there is no question of deception or confusion and the impugned trade mark is eligible for registration therefore the grounds of opposition ..... prescription given by registered medical practitioner however the marks are indistinguishable and the deception or confusion is still likely to be occurred even in hospitals and among the chemists and .....

Ramachander Laxminarayan Karva, Registered Partnership Firm, Rep. by I ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ246

..... with the offending marks on such goods which are deceptively and confusingly similar to the appellant s trade mark and for a direction ..... goods unaware of the concerned trade mark there cannot be any confusion in the mind of the purchasers of the goods and consequently ..... and to determine whether there is likelihood of deception or causing confusion this is evidence from the decisions of the apex court in .....

Usv Limited Vs. Ipca Laboratories Limited

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003(26)PTC21(Mad)

..... pioglar pioglu pioglit pionorm piolem piolet and piozit there is no confusion in sale of medicines on the ground of deception of ..... and to determine whether there is likelihood of deception or causing confusion these observations appear to us to be contrary to the ..... of the respondent piozed is deceptively similar and will also create confusion in the mind of the customers purchasing medicine of the .....

Cadila Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd.

Court: Trademark

Reported in: (2002)(25)PTC776Reg

..... proceed further to examine the objection of the opponents however to avoid any chance of confusion and deception the rival marks must be compared the opponents mark is neopeptine and applicants ..... s prescription has been taken into consideration for deciding whether there was no likelihood of confusion being created the marks were not visually phonetically and structurally similar in the instant case .....

Kalyanpuri Flour Mills Private Vs. Jugal Kishore Harbanslal

Court: Trademark

Reported in: (2002)(25)PTC694Reg

..... above and having regard to the high probability of deception and confusion that may arise by registration of the impugned mark he ..... impugned mark and the opponent s trade mark further the alleged confusion and deception are wholly imaginary and can bear no relation ..... the applicants goods as prayed is likely to cause deception and confusion in the trade therefore the opponent s objection under section .....

Atul Kumar Manilal Shah, Proprietor, Annapurna Udyog Bhandar, Ahmedaba ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR467; 2002(3)MhLj568

..... was different the supreme court observed in our opinion there is hardly any likelihood of confusion of deception because the respondent s goods are confined to contraceptives for use by women ..... mark of the appellants being identical to their mark was likely to deceive or cause confusion the appellants opposed the application for rectification and denied that the respondents were the proprietors .....

Utah Vs. Evans

Court: US Supreme Court

..... addresses if no one replies to a particular form or the information supplied is confusing contradictory or incomplete the bureau follows up with visits by its field personnel occasionally ..... that the early censuses were not entirely accurate the enumerators confronted many problems including confusion regarding which houses belonged to which districts danger on the roads the unwillingness of .....

Living Media India Limited Vs. Jitender V. JaIn and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002VAD(Delhi)161; 98(2002)DLT430

..... without prior permission of the plaintiff it is averred that the confusion or deception is inevitable on account of this the plaintiff has ..... singh while canvassing the proposition that there is no scope for confusion or misleading the public as to the source and origin ..... such service through electronic media and it is likely to generate confusion and further there was no other object to choose mark aaj .....