Confusing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: confusing Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 619 results (0.012 seconds)Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Vs. Tosiba Appliances Company
Court: Trademark
Decided on: Sep-24-2001
Reported in: (2002)(24)PTC654Reg
..... only one of the tests for determining the question of likelihood of deception or confusion the trade connection between different goods is another such test exhypothesi this latter test ..... starts presuming franchise like connection between foreign products and indian products which either cause confusion or which appear to be deceptively similar indian courts have consistently and rightly disapproved .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnthony Kavalakattu Trading as Vs. E.M.i. Records Limited
Court: Trademark
Decided on: Jun-29-2001
Reported in: (2002)(24)PTC738Reg
..... goods covered by the registration proposed will not be reasonably likely to cause deception and confusion amongst substantial number of persons it follows therefore that before section 11 a can be ..... activity of the applicants and opponents is widely different in such circumstances the likelihood of confusion becomes practically non existent the question whether the use of the mark on goods not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Vrajlal Manilal and Co. Vs. M/S Bansal Tobacco Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2001
Reported in: 2001IIAD(Delhi)358; 89(2001)DLT780; 2001(58)DRJ184; 2001(2)RLR114
..... and it was held that there was trade connections between different goods likely to cause confusion between competing goods particularly when the competing goods closely resembled each other para 20 of ..... is only one of the tests for determining the question of likelihood of deception or confusion trade connection between different goods is another such test ex hypothesi this latter test applies .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThree-n-products Pvt. Ltd., 3030, Street No. 4, Ranjit Nagar, New Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2001
Reported in: 95(2002)DLT271
..... thereforee there is not even a remote possibility of any confusion or deception being caused in the mind of an unwary ..... the parties were vastly different then the possibility of any confusion or deception being caused to an unwary customer was axiomatically ..... state of mind of public in deciding whether it will be confused applying the text of misrepresentation the learned single judge jhunjhunwala .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Institute of Architects Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2001
Reported in: (2002)175CTR(Mad)449; 2002(139)ELT245(Mad); [2002]258ITR209(Mad); 2006[2]STR393; [2007]6STT112
..... was also specifically defined the learned senior counsel also suggested further that the petitioners were confusing in between the tax on profession as covered by entry 60 and the service ..... services 39 the further argument of mr mohan parasaran was that the concerned provisions are confusing according to him chartered accountant provide various kinds of services including the maintenance of accounts .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMars Incorporated Vs. Mares Confectioneries P. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-09-2001
Reported in: (2001)3MLJ200; 2002(24)PTC602(Mad)
..... mares by the defendant amounts to infringement of the plaintiffs trade marks mars and causing confusion and deception among the trade and public 5 whether the plaintiff is registered proprietor of ..... by the defendant company amounts to infringement of the plaintiffs trade mark mars and causing confusion and deception among the trade and public and that the plaintiff is a registered proprietor .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNovelty Emporium Vs. Novelty Creation Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2001
Reported in: 96(2002)DLT68
..... similarity is sufficient to give rise to great risk of confusion similarity and confusion are to be determined from the point of view of ..... raised that the plaintiff deliberately and with malafide intention tried to confuse the matter by not making it clear whether its trade ..... name varindera garments it was held that it was likely to confuse an ordinary customer and the reasoning of this court while .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChunni Lal Vs. Bharat Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-26-2001
Reported in: 2002(24)PTC535(Raj)
..... is not necessary in the circumstances to prove factual deceit or confusion before injunction can be granted the contention of the plaintiff ..... patrika dated 12 4 99 claiming likelihood of deceipt and confusion this notice very clearly states that shri chunni lal baheti ..... nor is there any question of any possible deceipt or confusion and there is therefore no comparative strength nor is there .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.V.S. Oil Mills Represented by Its Partner S.V. Chandrapandian Vs. S. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-2001
Reported in: 2002(24)PTC330(Mad)
..... of the applicant and the respondent would show substantive differences no confusion cause between the trade mark of the applicant and the ..... the defendant s mark deceptively similar and is likely to cause confusion in the mind of the general public an injunction was ..... passing off in other words the test as to likelihood of confusion ordeception arising from similarity of marks is the same both .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Braun-dexon, S.A. Vs. Philippe Mailhebiau
Court: Trademark
Decided on: Aug-14-2001
Reported in: (2002)(24)PTC486Reg
..... two marks are different enough both visually and phonetically to prevent any likelihood of confusion the opposition has been entered within the time limit form and conditions prescribed according ..... public in the territory in which the earlier trade mark is protected the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark phannaceutical and veterinary products .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial