Confusing - Judgment Search Results

Polo/Lauren Company, L.P. Vs. Royal Classic Mills Private Limited and ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... and the polo player symbol and the presumption of causing confusion and deception amongst public and trade is a mere figment ..... to be taken into account while considering the possibility of confusion arising between any two trade marks that where those two ..... tests for determining the question of likelihood of deception or confusion trade connection between different goods is another such test ex .....

Usv Limited Vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... of medicinal product as against other non medicinal products drugs are poisons not sweets confusion between medicinal products may therefore be life threatening not merely inconvenient nothing the frailty ..... are medicinal products each with different effects and designed for even subtly different uses confusion among the products caused by similar marks could have disastrous effects for these reasons .....

Washington State Grange Vs. Washington State Republican Party

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at 375 376 stevens j dissenting rejecting judgments based on imaginative theoretical sources of voter confusion and entirely hypothetical outcomes indeed because i 872 has never been implemented we do ..... is no basis in this facial challenge for presuming that candidates party preference designations will confuse voters i 872 does not on its face severely burden respondents associational rights we .....

Needle Industries India Limited Vs. Narayan Prasad Tanwar and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... the applicants trade mark when registered and used will not cause confusion or deception is on the applicant the respondent no 2 has ..... we are of the opinion that there is every possibility of confusion and deception being caused among the pubic as the rival marks ..... the mark which is identical by the respondents would definitely cause confusion among the pubic making the pubic to think that goods bearing .....

Evergreen Sweet House Vs. Ever Green and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: LC2009(1)14; 2008(38)PTC325(Del)

..... defendant from using the trademark and trading style evergreen or any other mark deceptively or confusingly similar to the plaintiff s mark 2 the plaintiff a partnership firm was established on ..... mipr2007 2 193 18 the standard or threshold to determine infringement thereforee is likelihood of confusion in judging whether the offending mark infringes it is not always necessary to keep both .....

Philips Electronics Nv Vs. M/S Kunj Aluminium Pvt. Ltd., and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... were pressure cooker which would definitely not lead to any confusion or deception among the public 16 the first respondents trade ..... allowing the application to proceed for registration would definitely cause confusion among the public 24 in view of the well settled ..... appellants goods being electrical cooker there is no possibility of confusion cannot be agreed there is identity of goods marks and .....

A. P. Selvarajan Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... the identical goods which is bound to cause deception and confusion amongst the trade and public therefore the impugned registration ..... are distinctively different and there is no possibility of any confusion especially when the applicant is marketing the said brand ..... identical mark is inevitable to cause or likely to cause confusion and deception the impugned registration is contrary to the provisions .....

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and anr. Vs. Harinder Kohli and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 155(2008)DLT56; LC2009(1)274; 2008(38)PTC185(Del)

..... picture by repeated references and allusions to the plaintiffs trademark harry potter is creating immense confusion and deception in the minds of the potential audience of the former s film resulting ..... defendants promotional video namely zain khan and shamita shetty according to him further compounds the confusion 10 the plaintiffs counsel contends that as soon as they came to know that the .....

M/S. A. Habeebur Rahman Sons and Mr. K. Rajender

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... two trade marks are deceptively similar likely to deceive or cause confusion to public a trade mark cannot be registered if it is ..... question whether the two marks are likely to give rise to confusion or not is a question of first impression and it is ..... of beedies and the respondents goods under his trade mark is causing confusion or deception without cogent documentary evidence on record we are not .....

M/S. Hassan Bricks Field Vs. Shri Faim Khan, Trading as M/S. Khan Bric ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... the trade mark k c would deceive and cause confusion or likely to cause confusion with the trade mark of the applicant he stressed that ..... mark of the applicant and the trade mark of respondent cannot cause confusion and the applicant has not rebutted in para 6 of the counter ..... of idea in the two marks is reasonably likely to cause a confusion between them when compared the two marks kic and k c by .....