Confusing - Judgment Search Results

Kp Permanent Make-up, Inc. Vs. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... out a prima facie case of trademark infringement including the element of likelihood of consumer confusion the defendant may offer rebutting evidence to undercut the force of the plaintiff s ..... evaluate some other concerns that courts might pick as relevant quite apart from attention to confusion the restatement raises possibilities like commercial justification and the strength of the plaintiff s .....

Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Vets Farma (Private) Ltd.and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... the use of the respondent s mark would definitely create confusion further the distributing window being the same medicine for veterinary ..... specifically mentioned that the impugned mark will not cause any confusion especially due to the reason that the respondent s medicine ..... from that of the appellant there is no possibility of confusion deputy registrar on this ground did not discuss anything in .....

income Tax Officer Vs. Bua Dass

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Reported in: (2005)97TTJ(Asr.)650

..... like ddit inv the fact that such statement was given in a confused state of mind is fully evident from the other evidence about ..... reference the fact that the assessee had given the statement in a confused state of mind is amply proved by the assessee from the following ..... these facts stated it is obvious that the assessee was indeed in confused state of mind when his statement was recorded by the ddit .....

Motor Industries Company Limited Vs. Capital Automobiles and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... only visually but also phonetically there is every possibility of confusion and deception especially if the pronunciation of the first respondent ..... be construed that the impugned mark if registered would cause confusion and deception in the trade it cannot be compared syllable ..... and deceptively similar to calmprose and is likely to cause confusion which is almost identical to the facts of the present .....

Maya Appliances Private Limited, Represented by Mr. Durairajan General ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004(4)CTC334

..... grinders only shows the mala fide intention of the first respondent to misrepresent and cause confusion regarding the source of the first respondent s mixer grinder amongst the traders and ..... same source the misrepresentation and deceptive marketing carried on by the first respondent is causing confusion to gullible consumers members of the trade and such false claim will definitely prejudice the .....

United States Vs. Lara

Court: US Supreme Court

..... decisis are particularly compelling in the law of tribal jurisdiction an area peculiarly susceptible to confusion and confusion i fear will be the legacy of today s decision for our failure to ..... critically our tribal sovereignty case law both the court and the dissent however compound the confusion by failing to undertake the necessary rigorous constitutional analysis i would begin by carefully .....

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Reddy Pharmaceuticals Limited

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2005]128CompCas42(Delhi); 2004(76)DRJ616; 2004(29)PTC435(Del)

..... time the user of their name starts harming their business interests and starts misleading and confusing their customers 20 it is also argued that the pharmaceutical preparations being marketed and sold ..... started marketing some preparations with deceptively similar names and packaging also so as to create confusion the plaintiff s product omez was copied by the defendant by introducing the same drug .....

Jolen Inc., Rep. by Its Constituted Attorney, Mr. A. Arulselvan Vs. Mr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2004)3MLJ176; 2005(30)PTC385(Mad)

..... manufactured by the appellant and there have been instances of actual confusion among the customers in india by sale of crsme bleach bearing ..... of plaintiffs or at least the likelihood of the buyers being confused or misled into that belief the fact that the cost of ..... pirated in totality and not by way of having deceptive or confusing similarity we are living in a world where there is enormous .....

Sudarsan Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... duration area and volume of trade iii the degree of confusion likely to follow from the resemblance of the applicant s ..... of the public inconvenience iv whether any concrete instances of confusion have in fact been proved and v the relative inconvenience ..... their products are the same which are liable to cause confusion and deception moreover the rectification proceedings initiated by the second .....

Babulal G. JaIn Vs. Golden View Electrical Industries Pvt. Ltd. and An ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... mark can be registered as there is no possibility of confusion or deception even assuming that there is some trade connection ..... same or of the same description there cannot be any confusion or deception as the origin being totally different and distribution ..... an identical mark benz with respect to undergarments will lead to confusion in the market although the manufacturers of mercedes benz cars .....