Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Year: 2018 Page 1 of about 302 results (1.392 seconds)Lok Prahari, Thr. Its General Secretary s.n. Shukla . Vs. Union of Ind ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-16-2018
..... law the proviso thereto contains a reference to the payment of pension the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 contains various provisions for the payment of pension on his her demission of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLok Prahari, Thr. Its General Secretary s.n. Shukla . Vs. Union of Ind ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-16-2018
..... law the proviso thereto contains a reference to the payment of pension the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 contains various provisions for the payment of pension on his her demission of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi and District Cricket Association Through Its Honorary General Se ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-23-2018
their duties e the balance sheet duly audited with the auditor s shall be remarks laid the executive body at before 2 two joint secretary company affairs shall retire at annual general meeting which held is to subsequent the annual general meeting iii sports working committee shall perform the following functions and duties a to supervise all the sports relating activities within company resign the executive committee the executive committee shall have the powers to appoint from page 7 of 62 not passed382 4 depart from it in the case of ddca the above condition shall be read as part of article 40 of the 2 committee i for the purpose procuring of for items services company or for execution of any matches bcci tournaments indian committee and club the committee for the benefit of different activities of the association a 40 the office bearers namely president
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Sandeep Khandelwal and Ors. Vs.registrar Cooperative Societies an ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-29-2018
were not agreeable to the audit report submitted by the auditors and instead of signing it the president and the treasurer c 8969 2018 page 4 of 8 rules call a general body meeting of its members for considering the audit report time period laid down in section 60 1 of the act she further states that even the said returns have not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDaljit Singh & Anr vs.hari Steel & General Industries Ltd & Ors
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-02-2018
by you and by us we have submitted our statutory auditors report on your financial statements on 25 08 2005 you balance sheet as filed by m s hari steel and general industries limited with the registrar of companies and the income the case may be ii in addition to exercise of powers under rule 1 i above the court may impose suitable dilawari on all pages thereon or to the terms and conditions of the agreement 22 i a no 8899 2005 filed del 266 raj kumar chawla v m s lucas indian services again this pronouncement merely restates the well settled principles to the agreement ref section 16 c of the specific relief act 1963 144 we also find a letter dated 20th august
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHargovind Sharma vs.n.c.jindal Public School and Ors
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-28-2018
employees etc for grant of financial upgradation performance of such duties as are entrusted to the employees together with financial upgradation by the instructions issued by the dopt in this regard condition no 6 of the instructions issued by the dopt as the time he had already put in 35 years of service the school did not deem it appropriate to take any the school did not deem it appropriate to take any action in that regard and allowed him to continue in service the petitioner as lab assistant inasmuch as on 23rd april 1971 fresh recruitment rules for the post of lab assistant had
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarvesh Security Services Pvt Ltd vs.centre for Development of Telemat ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-27-2018
from 01 11 2007 to 18 05 2010 our cag auditors dot performance auditors and internal audit reports have observed that dated 01 11 2007 and that payment for the security services rendered from 01 02 2010 to 18 05 2010 has the acknowledgment of liability under section 18 of the limitation act 8 there is no merit in this appeal dismissed november27 ltd and ors v the aluminium corporation of india ltd 1971 1 scc67 6 there is no dispute to the proposition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNokia India Private Limited vs.additional Commissioner of Income Tax a ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-06-2018
petitioner company was aware of the appointment of the special auditor and they would like to explore legal options and respond dependent upon provisions of a particular statute but under the general law 38 pertinently in m m rubber and company supra 2974 2013 page 18 of 29 and fixed to exercise power under section 11 10 of the said act in that e 31 12 2009 that being so the necessary pre condition of w p c no 2974 2013 page 23 of communication in this context can be actual or even constructive service of the letter dated 30th march 2013 with the terms special audit under section 142 2a of the income tax act 1961 as approved by the commissioner of income tax delhi
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmanpreet Singh vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jun-11-2018
the company both accused persons and ca shri ck garg auditor of the company has filed the balance sheet with roc has launched the alleged scheme only with intention to cheat general public bail appln 2060 2017 bail appln 2070 2017 page were allowed to be granted bail pending trial on stringent conditions and it has thus been contended on behalf of the raj sharma c rs 3 41 crore of tds and service tax payable to the govt by inderpreet singh and that circulation schemes banning act 1978 and it is a banned activity under the said act d the alleged company has launched
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Election Commissioner, Bihar Patna Vs. Janakdhari Prasad .
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-03-2018
was a chartered accountant and a partner of firm of auditors carrying on business under the name and style of a unable to accept the argument of the learned additional advocate general that the appointment of district government counsel by the state to reduce the risk of conflict of interest between the duties and interest 24 in jaya bachchan v union of india the committee can make bye laws prescribing the duties and powers of its employees cannot in our opinion convert the servants the aforesaid provisions in chapter vii relating to appointment and conditions of engagement of district government counsel show that the appointments to which category of office shall come within the expression service for host of factors have to be taken into consideration as 1 air1954sc65313 contemplated by section 14 of the 1951 act the said judgment was reversed by the division bench of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT