Skip to content


Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: supreme court of india Year: 2018 Page 1 of about 302 results (1.814 seconds)
Apr 16 2018 (SC)

Lok Prahari, Thr. Its General Secretary s.n. Shukla . Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-2018

..... law the proviso thereto contains a reference to the payment of pension the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 contains various provisions for the payment of pension on his her demission of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 2018 (SC)

Lok Prahari, Thr. Its General Secretary s.n. Shukla . Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-2018

..... law the proviso thereto contains a reference to the payment of pension the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 contains various provisions for the payment of pension on his her demission of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 2018 (SC)

State Election Commissioner, Bihar Patna Vs. Janakdhari Prasad .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-03-2018

of a company and the said firm acted as the auditor of certain companies and corporations the appellant carried with it corrupt practices the disqualification shall cease after six years of general election 2 if any question arises as to whether a status is the attachment to legal relationship of rights and duties imposed by the public law and not by mere agreement the committee can make bye laws prescribing the duties and powers of its employees cannot in our opinion convert the servants india in the courts of ujjain on the terms and conditions therein mentioned one of the terms shows that the appellant in my opinion for bringing an office within the expression service of state government there has to be a relationship of that the word service has not been defined under the act and hence its meaning has to be ascertained in the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 2018 (SC)

Ruby Tour Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-30-2018

sheet and profit loss account duly audited by the statutory auditors tax audit report and income tax return itr contract for learned attorney general and ms pinky anand learned additional solicitor general have been heard for the respondent 17 shri santosh krishnan unlawfully since the issue is one of enforcement of public duties the remedy would be available under public law notwithstanding that purpose of public law is not only to civilize public power but also to assure the citizen that they 33 live applications of petitioners have been rejected for not fulfilling few conditions as enumerated in annexure a of pto policy for haj petition writ petition c no 638 of 2018 ruby tour services pvt ltd vs union of india 8 the petitioner was party to claim compensation under the private law in an action based on tort through a suit instituted in a court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2018 (SC)

Dr. Kriti Lakhina Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2018

of karnataka for the academic year 2014 2015 similarly the general time schedule for counselling and admissions for postgraduate dental courses equipments up gradation of infrastructure and recruitment of skilled man power today there are 3435 posts of specialists about which 1312 in private colleges the reply further stated that these eligibility conditions were stipulated in order to ensure that the state s therein from time to time reservation of seats for in service candidates is only permissible in post graduate diploma courses further of karnataka in its written submissions sought to justify the action but did not explain how the decision in vishal goyal scr381 1971 2 scc228 1968 2 scr7869 1971 2 scr430 1971 1 scc38 air1971sc230310 1971 suppl scr608 1971 2 scc29311 1980

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 07 2018 (SC)

United Air Travel Services Through Its Proprietor a.d.m. Anwar Khan Vs ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-2018

had been granted to the petitioners 10 learned additional solicitor general appearing for the respondents could not dispute the aforesaid position unlawfully since the issue is one of enforcement of public duties the remedy would be available under public law notwithstanding that purpose of public law is not only to civilize public power but also to assure the citizen that they live under following documents sl no vii x xi xii terms and conditions proof of payment made through banking bank statement or other original jurisdiction writ petition civil no 631 of2016united air travel services through its proprietor a d m anwar khan petitioner versus to have public effect and are intended to affect the actings and conduct of those to whom they are addressed and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 2018 (SC)

Rajdeep Ghosh Vs. The State of Assam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2018

in the matter of such reservation and the learned attorney general in response to the inquiry made by the court filed local needs must receive due consideration keeping in view the duties of the state contained in articles 41 and 47 the 3 there is a presumption as regard the state s power on extent of its legislative competence 4 hardship of few the punjab and haryana high court had challenged the eligibility conditions of 22 1994 insofar as they require that candidates should make for equality of opportunity for medical education and medical service for backward human sectors may be constitutionalised even by articles facto equality the state must therefore resort to compensatory state action for the purpose of making people who are factually unequal 18 in kumari n vasundara v state of mysore anr 1971 2 scc22 this court considered the government rules for admission

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 2018 (SC)

The Goa Foundation Vs. M/S Sesa Sterlite Ltd. And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-07-2018

from the summary of mining audit report submitted by the auditors and handed over to us by the learned additional solicitor illegal 121 we were informed by the learned additional solicitor general that of the 88 mining leases that were renewed 38 state government act as mere delegates of parliament while exercising powers under the mmdr act and the mc rules it is writ petition civil no 435 2012 and subject to the conditions laid down by the apex court in the said writ contrary to the provisions of section 11 of the mmdr act in that a non statutory criterion was taken into consideration

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 04 2018 (SC)

Sp Singla Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-04-2018

the present case the proviso in clause 65 of the general conditions of the contract cannot be taken to be the the contract relates and that in the course of his duties as government servant he had expressed views on all or proceeding under section 11 6 of the 1996 act while power has been vested in the chief justice to appoint an contract which reads as under clause 65 of the general conditions of contract except where otherwise provided in the contract all appellant contractor that the appointed arbitrator is an employee in service of the hppwd which the provision of section 12 5 time of such transfer vacation of office or inability to act shall appoint another person to act as arbitrator in accordance

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 2018 (SC)

National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired/ Retired Employees Associ ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-2018

made even more explicitly clear by clause 8 specifying the general conditions in sub clause xiv which reads as under 8 in sub clause xiv which reads as under 8 general conditions xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xiv save as provided in benefit of these very five 5 added notional years of service for calculation of their pension under the svrs 2004 scheme 5 years of extra service for calculation of pension while actually the same had been specifically excluded however such endeavour proved

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //