Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Year: 2017 Page 1 of about 302 results (1.464 seconds)Balaraj Jadhav & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-12-2017
..... page 35 of 38 to his instructions takes place subject audit the comptroller and auditor general of india may also conduct supplementary audit and a test audit under section 19 1 of the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 audit of companies is to be conducted by him in terms of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India & Ors vs.r.p. Tiwari
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-15-2017
..... comptroller and auditor general on a member of the indian audit and w p c 5913 2002 page 7 of 16 accounts service ..... a power of appointment or it is a condition of service in both the situations the power lies ..... in connivance with other officers on duty the inquiry officer held the charges ..... in s n sen case 1971 2 scc889 1972 2 scr251 that ..... counsel for the petitioners the act of confirmation by the osd cannot .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIAE International Aero Engines AG, Represented herein by its Attorney, ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-07-2017
financial figures of the various balance sheets audit reports independent auditors reports and their qualifications in the annual reports commencing from it would not benefit him or the company s creditors generally the grounds furnished by the creditors opposing the winding up chargee to put in force and exercise all rights and powers in relation to the guarantees since kfal in breach of respondent company because such a proposal is hedged with the conditions practically impossible of compliance and therefore this court finds no 2010 since 2011 12 the borrower company kfal failed to service the loans and repay the principal and interest under mdra 433 e and f read with 439 of the companies act 1956 accordingly the respondent company kingfisher airlines limited having its vs madhu woollen industries p ltd a i r 2 1971 3 scc 632 the hon ble supreme court held that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarem Sivajee Vs. J.Prasad Babu and Others
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-06-2017
article 76 of the constitution of india the controller and auditor general of india under article 148 and the governor under 2011 9 scc 354 2011 4 scc civ 673 attorney general v hrh prince ernest augustus of hanover 1957 1 aer or grossly indifferent in regard to the discharge of his duties in relation to the protection of the interests of the under law to be fair just and reasonable and such powers to make appointment to public offices should be exercised in time section 6 relates to the term of office and conditions of service of the chairman and members and under sub such as integrity of the candidate and his record of service to the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes were implied the petitioners would submit that section 11 of the 2003 act confers powers akin to a civil court on the commission
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsmitha Microfin Limited (Asmitha)
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-03-2017
as the latest financial position of the company the latest auditor s report on the accounts of the company the pendency and it relied on hindustan commercial bank limited v hindustan general electrical corporation air 1960 cal 637 and the relevant observations 1961 cd 270 and the proposed reduction is within the powers of the company and for the purposes allowed by the similarly voting for or against the motion subject to the conditions stipulated in the vote is no voting in the eye are engaged in the business of providing financial and support services to marginalized sections of the society particularly underserved rural and of andhra pradesh micro finance institutions regulation of money lending act 2010 brought a drastic change on the operations of both
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Sankar Nadar and Another Vs. Deva Krishnan
Court : Chennai Madurai
Decided on : Jan-20-2017
prohibition against subletting or parting with possession this is a general statement of law which ought to be read in the when the findings are not perverse this court while exercising power under section 100 of the code of civil procedure cannot is to be performed in a reasonable time if the conditions are i from the express terms of the contract ii limitation act in the context of section 3 of the act we are obviously confronted only with article 54 of the was in possession of the suit property from 31 05 1971 itself upto 31 05 1975 and she is not therefore
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ. Shamlal Vs. G. Manoharan, Proprietor, M/s. S.D.M. and Co., Chennai
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-06-2017
purpose of engaging or appointing any advocates vakils pleaders attorney auditors etc to sign and verify plaints written statements affidavits documents iii c p c does not include the act of general power of attorney to appear as a witness on behalf court aptly points out that the appellant complainant through his power agent in the complaint in c c no 3331 2010 pay a sum of rs 1 00 000 as pre condition for returning of the documents or else the blank cheques and proviso of section 2 of the power of attorney act however an examination of attorney as a witness in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Ramakrishna Ashram Yadavagiri, Rep. by its President Swami Muktida ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-13-2017
class i to v wherever required 8 learned addl advocate general gives us a solemn undertaking that free transportation shall be said goal the state is free to exercise its sovereign powers of legislation to regulate the conduct of its citizens to the poor students and another institution accredited with widespread public service and associated with the historic importance of the premises in promise may be enforced ex contractu by a person who acts upon the promise when the law requires that a contract scc 732 d b civil special appeal nos 444 of 1971 and 117 of 1972 raj gujarat state financing corporation v
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Janakiram and Others Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secret ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-04-2017
by the way such an expression or opinion as a general rule is not binding as authority or precedent within the prepared or collected by him in the course of such duties whether from official source or otherwise to any other person the employees in co operative societies 17 in exercise of powers conferred by section 180 of the tamil nadu co operative privilege leave or earned leave shall be subject to the conditions that such surrender shall be made without actually going on of commencement of these rules shall not be continued in service unless he takes steps to acquire the qualification within one all the rules made under tamil nadu co operative societies act 1961 tamil nadu act 53 of 1961 and under the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahaboobsa Begum Vs. Soorsha Makkan Wakf, Represented by its Executive ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-27-2017
an order for recovery of the amount certified by the auditor under section 47 2 of the act the mutawalli or which excludes such jurisdiction is therefore an exception to the general rule that all disputes shall be triable by a civil others cited supra this court has observed as follows the powers of the tribunal are restricted only to the dispute specifically section 83 1 also appears in section 85 of the act section 85 does not however exclude the jurisdiction of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT