Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 305 results (0.345 seconds)T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-26-2005
Reported in : AIR2005SC4256; (2005)6CompLJ158(SC); JT2005(8)SC588; (2006)1SCC1
..... may be reference has also been made to the provisions of the comptroller and auditor general duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 for short the cag act and the submission is that no provision under the notification shows .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Lal Son of Late Bahraich, Executive Engineer, Construction Divi ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-09-2005
Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2631; 2005(2)ESC1125
v sardul singh 1970 3scr302 p v srinivasa sastry v comptroller auditor general of india 1993 illj824sc director general esi and in p v srinivasa shastri and ors v comptroller and auditor general of india 1993 illj824sc the hon ble supreme court sastry v comptroller auditor general of india 1993 illj824sc director general esi and anr v e abdul razak jt 1996 6 advisable to permit him to continue not to perform his duties in the office or his retention in office is likely the power to the director general for further delegation of powers the court held that the proceedings can be initiated by summarised that the suspension of an employee is not a condition of service like transfer neither a suspension order can be the suspension of an employee is not a condition of service like transfer sanction of prosecution under the provisions of prevention of corruption act 1947 for the reason that article 311 of the constitution
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNoushad Vs. State of Kerala
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jun-17-2005
Reported in : 2005(4)KLT381
one such decision is that of the supreme court in comptroller and auditor general of india v mohan lal mehrotra 1992 decision is that of the supreme court in comptroller and auditor general of india v mohan lal mehrotra 1992 illj335sc in is that of the supreme court in comptroller and auditor general of india v mohan lal mehrotra 1992 illj335sc in view as such transfers are concerned the government has the reserve powers to prescribe parameters as the circumstances may justify and we not help the cause of the petitioners since their service conditions as authorised by the rules provide that interdepartmental transfer will s siri jagan jj post of pharmacist in homeopathy subordinate service special rules for kerala homeopathy subordinate service rules 1999 introducing repatriation the transfer made after reversion was illegal and an act without jurisdiction the drop in emoluments therefore could not be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Joseph Louis Vs. the District Welfare Fund Committee, Represented b ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-24-2005
Reported in : 2005(2)CTC321; (2005)2MLJ506
accounts of csir are required to be audited by the comptroller and auditor general and placed before the parliament in the district funds for the purpose of the building of an auditorium by 1976 the building was completed and the kalaiarangam was the prime minister is its ex officio president its director general is appointed by the government of india the power to above mentioned functions of the board do amount to public duties or state functions the question for our consideration is would by part iii and for any other purpose 13 the powers of the supreme court under article 32 and high court casting positive obligation upon it we don t find such conditions are fulfilled in respect of a private company carrying on cannot lay down or change the terms and conditions of service of its employees and any alteration in the bye laws an authority as defined in article 12 and as the action complained of is that of a private body exercising private
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrincipal Accountant General and anr. Vs. C. Subba Rao
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-27-2005
Reported in : 2005(2)ALD1; 2005(2)ALT25
401 of 1992 dated 2 12 1992 p yellamanda v comptroller and auditor general of india hereafter called yellamanda case a supreme court high court members of election commission comptroller and auditor general etc if a government servant is retired on a on 11 3 2002 to the first petitioner principal accountant general audit requesting to sanction increment of rs 275 which fell having been created in order to fill all posts involving duties of approximately the same character or degree of responsibility in the effect of similarly postponing future increments the authority having powers to withhold is in the case of ministerial and menial continued to be applied by various departments in respect of conditions of service if they are not inconsistent with the rules junior engineer and who on completion of fifteen years of service was given the benefit of fr 22 1 a i his employment under insured to claim compensation under workmens compensation act the insurer is statutorily duty bound to discharge the liability
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKirit Dahayabhai Shah and ors. Vs. Chetan Kantilal Sheth and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-11-2005
Reported in : 2005CriLJ2427
reference under section 15 2 of the contempt of courts act the learned judge seems to have not carefully read paragraphs are discharged reference stands deposed of contempt of courts act 1971 section 15 2 criminal contempt reference by civil court allegation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTalachintala Paidayya Vs. Toleti Jeevaratnam and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-28-2005
Reported in : 2005(4)ALD155
time so that rent controller can take necessary action for service of notice of deposit under sub rule 4 of rule the writ petition is dismissed no costs all india services act 1951 sections 8 11 a p buildings lease rent and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSabbisetti Jaganmohan Rao Vs. Gowrisetti Satteyya
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-28-2005
Reported in : 2005(4)ALD242; 2005(4)ALT415
appeal and cross objections are dismissed no costs all india services act 1951 sections 8 11 a p buildings lease rent and cross objections are dismissed no costs all india services act 1951 sections 8 11 a p buildings lease rent and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoya Hari @ Pedda Narsimlu @ Boya Hari Chinnaiah Vs. N. Vasa Reddy and ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-12-2005
Reported in : 2005(3)ALD775; 2006(2)ALT206
time so that rent controller can take necessary action for service of notice of deposit under sub rule 4 of rule a reasonable time so that rent controller can take necessary action for service of notice of deposit under sub rule 4
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.P. Raju Vs. Second Appellate Authority Under Section 48(3) of A.P. S ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-21-2005
Reported in : 2005(3)ALD757; [2005(106)FLR677]
petitioner to file any fresh proceedings for contempt all india services act 1951 sections 8 11 a p buildings lease rent he filed an appeal under section 48 1 of the act and ultimately the same was allowed as per the orders
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT