Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.394 seconds)Shri b.s. Yeddyurappa Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-05-2016
..... and independent authority and derives his power and duties from article 149 to 151 of the constitution and his duties powers and conditions of service are envisaged by the comptroller and auditor general duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 he is the premier institution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPfizer Limited & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-01-2016
..... context of section 20 of the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 requiring the terms and conditions of audit to be agreed upon by the comptroller and auditory general cag in consultation with concerned government .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.S. Yeddyurappa The State of Karnataka, by the Inspector of Police, B ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-05-2016
..... and independent authority and derives his power and duties from article 149 to 151 of the constitution and his duties powers and conditions of service are envisaged by the comptroller and auditor general duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 he is the premier institution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagannath Vs. Satpuda Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Others
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Jul-05-2016
made absolute in above terms maharashtra employees of private schools conditions of service regulation act 1977 section 7 9 maharashtra employees that the petitioner was never intending to resign from the services of the respondent the allegation made by the petitioner that would be substantial compliance of section 7 of the meps act the learned counsel submitted that the school tribunal after having
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Chinnasamy Vs. Muthukumar
Court : Chennai Madurai
Decided on : Feb-25-2016
148 section 427 section 506 ii contempt of the courts act 1971 section 11 contempt disobey petitioner sought to punish respondent section 427 section 506 ii contempt of the courts act 1971 section 11 contempt disobey petitioner sought to punish respondent for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTE. Visalatchi Vs. T. Balamurugan
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Oct-04-2016
petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act 1971 praying to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience law if she so desires advised contempt of courts act 1971 section 11
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVembu Ammal Vs. Jeyakumar
Court : Chennai Madurai
Decided on : Aug-10-2016
contempt proceedings under section 11 of the contempt of court act 1971 to punish the contemnor respondent for the willful disobeyance proceedings under section 11 of the contempt of court act 1971 to punish the contemnor respondent for the willful disobeyance of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajaram Vs. Kannabiran
Court : Chennai Madurai
Decided on : Aug-16-2016
officer kovilpatti thoothukudi district is dispensed with contempt of court act 1971 section 11 proceedings under section 11 of the contempt of court act 1971 to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the order dated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Raja Vs. The Director of Town and Country Planning, Chennai and Oth ...
Court : Chennai Madurai
Decided on : Nov-30-2016
to have been released as per section 38 of the act 4 the second respondent filed a counter affidavit wherein it 38 of the tamil nadu town and country planning act 1971 which deems the release of property in the event of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurcharan Singh Sahney and Others Vs. Harpreet Singh Chabbra and Other ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-16-2016
company 1898 2 ch 28 eastman photographic material company v comptroller general of patents designs and trade marks 1898 ac 571 of bias need not be established beyond reasonable doubt in general the rule against bias looks at the appearance or risk that they do not cross the limits they perform their duties in accordance with law and function within the ambit of objections had appointed the sole arbitrator by virtue of the powers conferred on him under section 11 5 and 6 of and declared that they agreed and confirmed the terms and conditions contained in the settlement deed dated 30 4 2012 with by the learned arbitrator that he had sought for the services of sri g s thakur advocate to assist him in 14 of the act are in part i of the act while section 14 2 provides for judicial intervention if a statutes 12th edn 1969 craies on statute law 7th edn 1971 pp 94 96 the rule is available at two stages
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT