Skip to content


Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Year: 2024 Page 1 of about 301 results (1.999 seconds)
Aug 23 2024 (SC)

M/s. Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigatio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-23-2024

..... principal secretary and 2014 9 scc516another iii glossary abbreviations of acts act of 1973 coal mines nationalization act 1973 cag act comptroller and auditor general duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 cr p c code criminal procedure 1973 cvc central vigilance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2024 (HC)

K-9 Enterprises Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-02-2024

of the view that even after the obligation to pay auditor s fees and incidental expenses has been taken over by opportunity of being heard before an order is made is generally read into the provisions of a statute particularly when the serious civil consequences are involved in the exercise of such powers compliance with the principles of natural justice is a sine elaborate his submissions as under i rule 86a specifies the conditions for use of amount available in the ecl and the invoices or debit notes without actually receiving any goods or services or both c the credit is availed by the registered been held that in view of section 136 of the act proceedings before an assessing officer are deemed to be judicial

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2024 (HC)

K-9 Industries Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-02-2024

explanation and clarification which may be required by the special auditor on various issues with relevant data document etc which in natural justice by way of exception and not as a general rule there are situations which demand the exclusion of the of 2023 26 section 45 of the vat act confers powers upon the commissioner to pass the order of provisional attachment to have some material to form a belief that the conditions under rule 86a are satisfied by making an independent analysis first mentioned three banks were excluded from employment and their services were not taken over by the respective 45 nc 2024 the exercise of power under section 142 2a of the act leads to serious civil consequences and therefore even in the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2024 (HC)

Kwality Metals Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-02-2024

during the audit of the accounts again by the special auditor he has to answer a large number of questions referring of 2023 wa no 100430 of 2023 4 auto and general engineering citizen society vs state of andhra pradesh air1988ap266 5 the quasi judicial or the executive authority invested with judicial powers 30 section 269ud 1 in express terminology provides that the exercising the said power by strictly complying with all the conditions requirements of the said provision further an order blocking the respondents by invoking rule 86a of the central goods and services tax rules 2017 for short the cgst rules which led permissible because it will leave citizens and their legitimate business activities to the peril of arbitrary power each of these ingredients

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 2024 (HC)

Chairman Vs. Smt K Chandrika

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-08-2024

record discloses that on 26 12 2008 complainant and his auditor appeared before the appellant and discussed the returns filed by in k r deb supra secondly what additional evidence was generated in the so called further enquiry or that which additional appeal to the disciplinary authority the disciplinary authority has enough powers to reconsider the evidence itself and come to its own further enquiry too under rule 15 1 of central civil services classification control and appeal rules 1965 which reads as under and for rectification under section 154 of the income tax act either in the case of reopening or in the case in k r deb vs collector of central excise shillong 1971 2 scc102 this was in the text of rule 15

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2024 (HC)

Mr. E.d. Prasad Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-28-2024

the defence 28 pw 4 h manjaiah the then senior auditor of co operative department of mysore was also called upon upon the prosecution and that burden never shifts notwithstanding the general rule that the burden of proof lies exclusively upon the show his honesty and integrity in discharge of his official duties as a public servant it is for the accused to within the expression known sources of income provided the second condition stands fulfilled that is to say such receipts were duly the same under rule 23 2 of the karnataka civil services conduct rules 1966 which reads as under 23 movable immovable he relies upon section 19 of the prevention of corruption act 1988 to submits that previous sanction is necessary for prosecution the accused while working as nmr between the period of 1971 1973 amounting to rs 3172 this is not being considered

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 2024 (SC)

Banshidhar Construction Pvt. Ltd Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-2024

all the members in jurisdictions that do not have statutory auditors the firm of auditors which audits the annual accounts of public through the respondent bccl 9 however the learned solicitor general mr tushar mehta learned senior counsel mr anupam lal das bccl it was nowhere stated in the nit that the power of attorney had to be notarised before signing the bid further submitted that the appellant had complied with all the conditions of the nit however the technical bid of the appellant that as per section 2 of the power of attorney act 1882 the donee of a power of attorney may if

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 2024 (SC)

The State Of Telangana Vs. Mohd. Abdul Qasim (died) Per Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-18-2024

the courts must make a distinction between the government s general obligation to act for the public benefit and the special protect and preserve the forests in discharge of their public duties clearly abdicated their role we are at a loss to 5 section 9 of the a p forest act 9 powers of forest settlement officer for the purpose of an inquiry owing to lost labour hours from extreme heat and humidity conditions moreover heatwaves could also last 25 times longer i e of carbon or 138 mt of co equivalent 2 mitigation service by india s forest and tree cover india s forests as prescribed under section 11 of the a p forest act under sections 8 and 9 of 9 the a p the a p forest act was concluded on 11 11 1971 thereafter without any jurisdiction an order was passed under section

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 2024 (SC)

Mandakini Diwan Vs. The High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-2024

secretary department of home respondent no 3 is the director general of police respondent no 4 is inspector general of police that the prosecution agency is reminded of its responsibility and duties in the discharge of its functions effectively and efficiently and doing complete justice and enforcing the fundamental rights 14 the powers of this court for directing further investigation regardless of the no 7 but also cause unnecessary harassment and jeopardize his service further a direction to appoint cbi to investigate is also 05 2018 dismissing the prayer of the present appellants to transfer the investigation to cbi is hereby set aside the appeal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 09 2024 (SC)

Chalasani Udaya Shankar Vs. M/s Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-09-2024

were informed that there was a police case against the auditor of the company they could not take any steps to attend or call upon the directors to hold the annual general meeting s 3 why the appellants did not take steps courts are called upon to interpret provisions affecting exercise of powers and jurisdiction by regulatory bodies it is the duty of company 25 in standard chartered bank vs andhra bank financial services limited2 a 3 judge bench of this court affirmed the precedential law relating thereto originally section 155 of the companies act 1956 dealt with rectification proceedings in connection with entry of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //