Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.374 seconds)M/S Cellular Operators Association of India and Others Versus Deptt. o ...
Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Decided on : May-19-2010
..... alia are i that having regard to the provisions of the comptroller and auditor general rsquo s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 1971 act the comptroller and auditor general has no jurisdiction to audit the accounts of the private operators ii in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Sun Direct Tv(P) Ltd Versus Union of India
Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Decided on : May-28-2010
..... and auditing by the comptroller and auditor general of india in accordance with provisions of section 16 of the comptroller and auditor general rsquo s duties powers and conditions of services act 1971 e necessary charges should ..... the purview of the definition of lsquo telecommunication services rsquo part of the act contained provisions relating to powers and functions of trai we are concerned with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBangalore International Airport Limited Vs. Karnataka Information Comm ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-09-2010
Reported in : ILR2010KAR3214
..... classified as substantially financed 5 indeed the scio has relied on section 14 of the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 for short the cag act to hold and decide as io what is substantially financed the petitioner s case is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Olympic Association Vs Veeresh Malik and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-07-2010
..... as provided under section 14 of the comptroller and auditor generals duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 hereafter called the cag act the explanation to section 14 1 of that act reads what is meant by a body ..... government are duly accounted for and subject to scrutiny by the comptroller and auditor general of india who addresses the public concern for appropriate utilization and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHar NaraIn (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Mam Chand (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-08-2010
conclusion that in view of section 19 b of the act 1963 and definition of notice contained under section 3 of 1971 for vacating modifying the interim order dated 10 8 1971 wherein he disclosed that the entire land in dispute had
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHari Om Gupta Vs State of Delhi and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-16-2010
and mr narender sharma the respondent no 5 and preventive action under section 107 150 cr p c was initiated by evident from section 2 of the contempt of courts act 1971 para 12 that contempt of a civil nature can be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Ehaghyamma Wife of Late Papachar and Sri Ramakrishna Son of Lale ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-19-2010
is filed under sections 11 12 of contempt of courts act 1971 praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the accused for filed under sections 11 12 of contempt of courts act 1971 praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the accused for disobeying
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSaifulla @ Abdul Azeez. Vs. B.S. VenkatarayA. S/O. KallappA. and ors
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-28-2010
demolished and having found that the appellant herein is in actual possession of the schedule property learned single judge was not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Shakunthala, W/O B Manjunatha Vs. Akhila Bharatha Billawara Union ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-28-2010
and directed the respondents to allow petitioner s continuance in service and etc in a proceeding under section 94 of the karnataka education act 1983 an alternative and efficacious remedy and therefore declined to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHanumanth S/O Malluppa Jewargi Vs. Manananda W/O Late Mallikarjun Jewa ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-29-2010
per month however her request is flatly refused 3 after service of notice the defendant entered appearance and filed statement of no 151681 09 filed u s 5 of the limitation act praying to condone the delay of 56 days in filing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT