Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.631 seconds)Municipal Board of Hardwar Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-18-1973
Reported in : ILR1973Delhi843
..... comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 no 6 of 1957 this act has been passed to prescribe the duties and powers of the comptroller and auditor general section 10 makes the comptroller and auditor general ..... be found to be applicable as a condition precedent to the duty to be preformed by the comptroller and auditor general of india or they must be found .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Accountant-general and anr. and T.G. Srinivasan Vs. S. Doraiswamy ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-06-1973
Reported in : (1973)2MLJ465
audit and accounts department and the administrative powers of the comptroller and auditor general shall be such as may be prescribed to rule 143 was administratively made by the comptroller and auditor general and it was mot framed as a rule by constitution says that there shall be a comptroller and auditor general of india who shall be appointed by the president in of india act 1919 were made in accordance with the powers in that behalf and were confirmed that means that rule the amendment in 1956 read as follows subject to the conditions in paragraph 139 and subject also to the right of and of any law made by parliament the conditions of service of persons serving in the indian audit and accounts department at the time of passing of the government of india act 1919 were made in accordance with the powers in that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKaur SaIn Vs. the State of Punjab
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-23-1973
Reported in : AIR1974SC329; 1974CriLJ358; (1974)3SCC649; [1974]2SCR393
its behalf it does not authorise him to entrust such powers as are expressly vested in the president by the constitution 258 1 2 the proceeding under s 5a of the act being quasi judicial in character authority to make a report
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Standard Wagon Co. Ltd. Vs. First Industrial Tribunal and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-25-1973
Reported in : AIR1974SC771; [1973(27)FLR15]; 1974LabIC466; (1974)3SCC212; 1973(5)LC687(SC)
to the court namely s 18 and s 30 the powers under the two sections are distinct and may be invoked land acquisition act were started under s 11 of the act the collector fixed the area of the land to be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDhool Singh Vs. Smt. Bardhu Bai and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-22-1973
Reported in : AIR1974Raj90; 1973()WLN47
on account of the licence being given from generation to generation or on account of the defendant having spent money in a mixed question of fact and law whether the necessary conditions about the irrevocability of the licence existed or not it coupled with a transfer of property and further the licensee acting upon the licence had executed a work of permanent character
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLalji and ors. Vs. the State of U.P.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-14-1973
Reported in : AIR1973SC2505; (1974)3SCC295; [1974]1SCR367; 1973(5)LC790(SC)
burden lies on him or her to prove four essential conditions namely 1 the factum of separation 2 animus deserendi 3 for his individual act and not vicariously liable for the acts of others 11 lalji gave the spear blow in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.S.M. Ratnaswami Nadar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-15-1973
Reported in : [1975]100ITR669(Mad)
has not been defined in the act the indian contract act defines consideration as when at the desire of the promisor
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Gangappa Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-11-1973
Reported in : AIR1975AP138
is repugnant to the parent act 102 in rex v comptroller general of patents bayer products ltd ex pane 1943 2 only by all the members of the routes committee the general rule therefore does not seem to have been abrogated we committees or others such of the corporation s powers and duties as the meeting thinks fit the historical background of this to make the enquiries 7 the governor accordingly delegated the powers to the home secretary under section 68 d of the and duties as it may think fit subject to such conditions and limitation as specified in the resolution thus the corporation and for augmentation as well as replacement and expansion of services that apart matters explained in annexure a to the note nationalisation are approved under section 68 f 2 of the act under that provision for the purpose of giving effect to j in picea holdings v london rent panel d c 1971 2 wlr 1374 and approved of the general principle we
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOfficial Liquidator, Supreme Bank Ltd. Vs. P.A. Tendolkar (Dead) by Lr ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-19-1973
Reported in : AIR1973SC1104; [1973]43CompCas382(SC); (1973)1SCC602; [1973]3SCR364
year settle and adjust such accounts with the board and auditors and shall make out the balance sheet and profit and from time to time be made by the company in general meeting provided that no regulation so made shall invalidate any a general principle even to cases involving breaches of fiduciary duties or where the personal conduct of the deceased director has past or present mentioned therein if directors act within their powers if they act with such care as is reasonably to is to hold such office on such terms provisions and conditions as to remuneration management of the company s business and associated with the decision to terminate r p joshi s service which lands some support to the suggestion on behalf of a second report a 2 under section 22 of the act was given by the reserve bank in which it was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaljee Dubey and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-13-1973
Reported in : AIR1974SC252; 1974LabIC193; (1974)ILLJ248SC; (1974)1SCC230; [1974]2SCR249; 1974(6)LC39(SC)
recommendation was accepted by the president of india the director general was directed to re classify checkers as lower division clerks the service of harness and saddlery factory and described the duties performed by them the trial court also referred to the m lodha jj commencement of arbitration dispute about charges for power driven boats contractor appointing his arbitrator and asking principal to judge held that the letter laid down conditions of service conditions of service could only be prescribed by the president by clerks if they were matriculates or completed three years continuous service the appellants claimed that they satisfied the tests and yet on re employment on the basis of their length of actual military service conferred any right relating to conditions of service
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT