Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amadeus IT Group Sa vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1 ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15815/2025 & CM APPL. 64767/2025 AMADEUS IT GROUP SA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Jain, Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal and Mr. Tavish Verma, Advs.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1)(1) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged theorder dated 22.07.2025 (mentioned as 09.06.2025) passed by the Office ofCircle INT TAX 1(1)(1) (hereinafter referred to as the competent authority) whereby the petitioners application under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2026-27 has been decided in the manner that the payer(s) making payment to the petitioner are required to deduct tax at the rate of 10%. The cert...
Lal Babu Raj @ Lallu vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4031/2025 LAL BABU RAJ @ LALLU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshuman Singh, Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar, Ms. Ujala, Mr. Manish Milansar and Ms. Neha, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State with WSI Ingkumnazo. Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Advocate for complainant/amicus.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 27.02.20261. The present application has been filed seeking regular bail in a case arising out FIR No. 460/2023 dated 01.07.2023, registered at P.S. New Ashok Nagar, Delhi, under Sections 377/451 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC) and Section 4 of Prevention of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 (POCSO).2. The applicant was arrested on 01.07.2023 and continues to be in incarceration since then.3. After framing of charges, the victim boy, as well as one materialwitness i.e. Mr. Jitender Kumar, (alleged eye witness), have already entered into witness box and, therefore, t...
Devi Dayal Garg vs Gaurav Jindal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1785/2025 DEVI DAYAL GARG .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Himanshu Garg, Advocate.versusGAURAV JINDAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Punia, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 27.02.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [in short, Act] seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under the following Loan Agreements: (i) Loan Agreement No. IN- DL87090639075794S dated 30.09.2020 for an amount of Rs. 1,05,00,000/- [hereinafter Agreement 1], (ii) Loan Agreement No. IN- DL98361528983978S dated 26.10.2020 for an amount of Rs. 51,00,000/- [hereinafter Agreement 2], (iii) Loan Agreement No. IN- DL98324815280109S dated 26.10.2020 for an amount of Rs.95,00,000/- [hereinafter Agreement 3] and, (iv) Loan Agreement No. IN- DL31595197791871T dated 16.01.2021 for an amount of Rs.99,00,000/- [hereinafte...
Smt.Shobhna Sonkar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17982/2024 SMT.SHOBHNA SONKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh, Advocate (through video conferencing)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kunal Rawat and Ms. Ritu Gaur, Advocate for R-1/MCD. Mr. Varun Dhingra, Mr. Prince Kathuria and Mr. Sarthak Jaryal, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondent no.1/MCD to implement the demolition order passed on 1st July, 2016 in respect of entire fourth floor of the property bearing no.2436, Punjabi Basti, Purani Subzi Mandi, Ghantaghar, Delhi.2. Status report has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.1/MCD wherein it is stated that the aforesaid property has been demolished in terms of action taken on 7th May, 2025 and 17th September, 2025.3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as satisfied. AMIT BANSAL, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026 ...
Aman@Wasim Khan @ MD Wasim vs the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4414/2025 & CRL.M.A. 34127/2025 AMAN@WASIM KHAN @ MD WASIM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, AdvocateversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr.Manoj Pant, APP for the State along with ASI Sunita, PS Alipur Ms. Payal Seth, Adv. for victim.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsel for the applicant at this stage seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application.2. The bail application alongwith pending applications, if any, is dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/rr/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:13:33...
State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) vs Sanjeev Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 3rd February, 2026 Pronounced on: 27th February, 2026 Uploaded on: 27th February, 2026 + CRL.A. 258/2016 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for the StateversusSANJEEV SINGH & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, (DHCLSC), Mr. Dhruv Choudhary, Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Mr. Shubham Sourav, Mr. Vijit Singh, Advs. with Respondents in person.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINJUDGMENTMADHU JAIN, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant under Section 378(1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter,CrPC)assailing the impugned judgment dated 15th November, 2014 (hereinafter, impugned order) passed by ld. ASJ Special Judge (NDPS)(West), Tis Hazari, Delhi in Sessions Case No.3/2011 arising out of FIR No. 339/2010, Police Station Punjabi Bagh.2. By the impugned order, the accused/Respondents (hereinafter Respondents) Sh. Sanjeev Singh and ...
Pardeep Jain vs Dharmarth Trust Mairh Kshatriyaan (Regd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 412/2025 PARDEEP JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Rathore, Mr. Anil Goswami, Mr. Kailash Rana and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.versusDHARMARTH TRUST MAIRH KSHATRIYAAN (REGD.) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Dhingra, Advocate (Through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. When the present matter was listed on 22.12.2025, after hearing thelearned counsel for the petitioner/ tenant, this Court was pleased to pass a detailed order and observe that there is hardly any reason for this Court to interfere with the well-reasoned impugned order passed by the learned ARC, the relevant extracts whereof are as under:- 11. Though before this Court, the petitioner has once again sought to agitate the issue of landlord tenant relationship, however, the same is/ are founded on the very same contentions which were raised before the learned ARC. They, being bald, vague and unsubstantiated assertions have ...
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited vs Akash Choudhary & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1924/2025 KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate (through VC)versusAKASH CHOUDHARY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 27.02.20261. None appears for the respondents, when the matter is called out.2. This Court notes that vide order dated 10th February, 2026, this Court had recorded as follows: 1. The Office Noting shows that respondent nos. 1 and 2 have been served through E-mail by the Registry.2. There are only two respondents. Accordingly, service upon the respondents stands completed.3. None appears for the respondents when the matter is called out.4. Accordingly, let replies be filed by the respondents, within a period of 10 days, from today.5. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within a period of 02 days, thereafter.3. Thus, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that an Arbitrator be appointed.4. The present pe...
Pawan vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4582/2025 PAWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Singh and Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Monika Singh.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of this application, the petitioner seeks regular bail inconnection with FIR No. 382/2025 dated 24.05.2025, registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, New Delhi, under Sections 376/323/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012.2. I am informed that material witnesses, including the prosecutrix,who is still a minor, have not yet been examined before the Sessions Court, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks liberty to withdraw this bail application, without prejudice to the petitioners right to approach the Sessions Court at an appropriate stage.3. However, Mr. Singh se...
Shri Sarabjit Singh & Anr. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8276/2025 SHRI SARABJIT SINGH & ANR. ..Petitioners Through: Mr. Anuuj Aggarwall, Advocates.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Mr. Samar Pratap, Advocate, and SI Sourabh Malik. Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. The petitioners have preferred the present petition under Section528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), seeking quashing of FIR No. 1252/2014 dated 24.12.2014 registered at Police Station K.N. Katju Marg, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, [IPC] and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, alongwith all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prose...