Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Asian Footwears Private Limited vs Bruton Footwear Private Limited & A ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 931/2025, I.A. 21534/2025 & I.A. 21535/2025 ASIAN FOOTWEARS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Prateek Kumar, Ms. Aarushi Jain, Mr. Yojit Pareek, Ms. Ankita, Mr. Prassant Kumar Sharma and Mr. Chetan Charitra, Advocates.versusBRUTON FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sagar Shivam Jaiswal and Mr. Adnan Hussain, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 27.02.20261. Parties submit that the inter se disputes have been resolved amicablyunder the aegis of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The terms of settlement have been reduced into writing vide the Settlement Agreement dated 16.02.2026.2. The Settlement Agreement dated 16.02.2026 has been filed by the DelhiHigh Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The terms of the Settlement Agreement have been recorded in para 1 at page 3 to para 18 at page 9 of the Settlement Agreement dated 16.02.2026.3...
Kapil Kochhar vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16030/2025 KAPIL KOCHHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhuresh Chaudhary, AdvversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj CGSC with Mr. Sanjay Pal GP for R- Mr. Ramesh Babu, Ms. Manisha Singh, Ms. Tanya Chowdhary Advocates for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/DM/DMThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 17:10:03...
Steel Authority of India Limited (Sail) vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13404/2024 and CM APPL. 56081/2024 Date of decision: 27.02.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED (SAIL) Having its Office at Ispat Bhawan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003 .....Petitioner (Through: Mr.Yashraj Singh Deora, Sr. Advocate with Mr Anand Varma, Ms Apoorva Pandey, Mr Polavarapu Sai Charan, Advocates.)versus1. UNION OF INDIA Through the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 110001 .....Respondent No.12. STATE OF ODISHA Through its Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Steel and Mines, Odisha Secretariat, Bhubaneswar, Distt. Khorda. .....Respondent No.23. DIRECTOR OF MINING & GEOLOGY, ODISHA Head of Department Building, Sachivalay Marg, Bhubaneswar-751001, Odisha. .....Respondent No.34. JOINT DIRECTOR OF MINES Office of the Director of Mining & Geology, Odisha Head of Department Building, Sachivalay Marg, Bhubaneswar-751001, Odisha. .....Respondent No.45. Deputy Director ...
Sanjeev Kumar Batra vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3278/2025 SANJEEV KUMAR BATRA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner through VCversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with ASI Vinod KumarCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6558/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 6557/2026 (withdrawal)1. The applicant seeks withdrawal of the present bail application without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the learned Sessions Court.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.3. The application stands disposed of. BAIL. APPLN. 3278/20254. In view of the above, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the application, and the same shall be considered by the BAIL APPLN. 3278/2025 Page 1 of 2 Court concerned in accordance...
Vijay Laxmi Mewara vs Ankit Mandraila
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 45/2024 VIJAY LAXMI MEWARA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Kumar Jain and Mr. Pranav Dwivedi, Advocates with petitioner in personVersusANKIT MANDRAILA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bhuwan Raj, Ms. Disha Choudhary and Mr. Subhangam Padhy, Advocates with respondent in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. Since much water has flown after passing of the impugned orderdated 30.07.2024, learned counsel for the parties, without adverting to the merits involved, submit that de hors the findings rendered therein by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saket, New Delhi (learned Trial Court) whereby the interim maintenance of the petitioner has been fixed @ Rs.10,000/- w.e.f. 15.03.2023, the parties are mutually agreeable to paying to the petitioner an interim maintenance of Rs.18,000/- per month effective from 01.01.2026 till final adjudication by the learned Trial Court.2. Addition...
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi &Ors. vs Chandi Ram Rangi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1856/2005 GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI &ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs.versusCHANDI RAM RANGI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nitesh Kumar and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 27.02.20261. A perusal of the Impugned Order dated 27.05.2003 passed bythe Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal] in O.A. No. 1361/2003 reveals that the same came to be issued on the very first date of hearing, without affording an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioners, who were arrayed as Respondents before the Tribunal.2. In essence, the Tribunal directed that the earlier servicerendered by the Respondent herein in the Directorate of Health Services, Delhi Administration and in the Health Centre, University of Delhi be counted as qualifying service for the purposes of pensionary benefits....
Shivam Bhadoria @ Chotu @ Tushar vs State(Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4104/2025 SHIVAM BHADORIA @ CHOTU @ TUSHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Manan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Uditi Bali, Mr. K.S. Choudhary, Ms. Rishika Ahuja, Ms. Jagriti, Mr. Lavish Chandra, Ms. Yakshi & Mr. Ankur Rana, Advocates.versusSTATE(NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 65/2025 dated 03.05.2025, registered under Sections 109(1)/309(6)/61(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Tilak Marg, District New Delhi.2. In the course of hearing, Mr. Aashneet Singh, learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor, submits that a material report of the Forensic Science Laboratory [FSL] is expected today, in respect of t...
M/S Tej Ram Dharam Paul & Anr. vs M/S Dholakia Tobacco Pvt Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 704/2023 M/S TEJ RAM DHARAM PAUL & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Amit Jain and Mr. Vikrant Malhotra, Advocates.versusM/S DHOLAKIA TOBACCO PVT LTD. & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sarath J Prakash, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 27.02.2026 I.A. 5570/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC)1. This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed on behalf of the plaintiffs and the defendants.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit that partieshave been able to amicably resolve their disputes out of Court and the said terms of settlement have been reduced into writing and enumerated in para 7 of the application.3. For convenience para 7 is extracted hereunder: 7. That the parties have mutually agreed to settle the matter as per the following terms and conditions: a. That the Defendants acknowledge that the ...
Jatin vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4157/2025 & CRL.M.A. 6620-6621/2026 JATIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vimal Tyagi, Mr. Balaji Pathak, Mr. Sudhanshu Tyagi, Ms. Tripuari Jha and Mr. Akshay Rathi, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP with Insp. Parveen Kumar and SI Ankit, PS- Moti Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 445/2026 (for restoration)1. This is an application filed for the restoration of the bail application.2. Mr. Aashneet Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, is present, as is Mr. Ram Chander, who is the father of the deceased.3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, for the reasons stated herein, the application is allowed, and Bail Application No. 4157/2025 is restored to its original number and is taken on Board. BAIL APPLN. 4157/20254. This is an application for regular bail in connection with FIR No. BAIL APPLN. 4157/2025 Page 1 of 2 the India...
Naushad Malik vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6424/2025 & CRL.M.A. 27119/2025 NAUSHAD MALIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dalip Kumar Santoshi, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Mr. Samar Pratap, Advocate SI Shiv Dayal Kumar. Ms. Priyanka Kaushik, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking quashing ofFIR No. 341/2023 dated 07.05.2023, registered under Sections 285/304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC] at Police Station Dayal Pur, District North East, New Delhi, on the ground that the parties have entered into a settlement.2. The FIR came to be registered on receipt of information that on06.05.2023, a fire had broken out in the basement of a showroom situated at E-8, Chand Bagh, near Bhajan Pura Petrol Pump, Delhi. The fire caused damage to goods and property, including approximately 10-11 vehicles. The Fire Service...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »