Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited vs Daksh Pharmaceuticals Priva ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 570/2025 GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vardaan Anand, Advocate.versusDAKSH PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Aman Gupta, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 27.02.2026 I.A. 5568/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)1. This is a joint compromise application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendants.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit that the interse disputes have been amicably resolved out of Court and the terms of settlement have been reduced into writing in the para 2 of the present application. The same has been reproduced hereunder for the sake of convenience: 2. That during the pendency of the proceedings, the Plaintiff and the Defendants initiated talks for amicably resolving the disputes between the parti...
M/S Paisalo Digital Limited (Formerly Known as S. E. Investments Limit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 27.02.2026 + ARB.P. 1022/2025 M/S PAISALO DIGITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshal Kumar, Advocate.versusM/S SUN CORP & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Mr. Vikrant Kumar and Mr. Amar Bajpayee, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition, filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes that are stated to have arisen inter se the parties arising out of the Clause 20 as set out in Hypothecation/Loan Agreement dated 02.03.2015. The said clause reads as follows: 20. Any conflict, difference, controversies, or disputes arising between the parties, if not resolved mutually, shall be submitted/referred to the arbitration of the Sole Arbitrator...
Sunita Ahuja & Anr. vs Divya Arora Ahuja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 234/2023, CM APPLs 47616/2023, 47618/2023 SUNITA AHUJA & ANR .....Appellants Through: counsel for appellants.versusDIVYA ARORA AHUJA .....Respondent Through: counsel for respondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of the present appeal filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC, the appellants assail the judgment and order dated 06.09.2023 passed by the learned ADJ-07, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CIV DJ No. 716/2023.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the impugned judgment was passed relying upon the decision dated 01.06.2022 in CM(M) 69/2020 titled Avneet Kaur v. Sadhu Singh & Anr. which has been set aside.3. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back for fresh consideration.4. The appeal along with pending applications is disposed of in above terms. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/rdThis is a digitally signed ...
Manhar Sabharwal vs Rakesh Sabharwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 306/2023 and CM APPL. 60955/2023 MANHAR SABHARWAL .....Appellant Through: Mr.Kharanshu Rana, AdvocateversusRAKESH SABHARWAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Sourabh Gupta, Mr Puneet Yadav and Mr Vasu Dev, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal, as the parties have arrived at a settlement.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, along with all pending application(s). DASTI. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026 naThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:12:01...
M/S Sai Fertilizers Private Limited vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 9060/2024 , CM APPLs.37030/2024, & 55432/2025 M/S SAI FERTILIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan (Sr. Advocate) along with Mr. Sahil Monga, Mr. Shashank Sharma, Mr. Shrudhar Kale, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA ......Respondent Through: Ms. Gauri Goburdhun (SPC) for UOI. + W.P.(C) 11099/2024, CM APPLs.45878/2024 & 68374/2024 M/S SAI FERTILIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan (Sr. Advocate) along with Mr. Sahil Monga, Mr. Shashank Sharma, Mr. Shrudhar Kale, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA ......Respondent Through: Ms. Gauri Goburdhun (SPC) for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAJUDGMENT1. The present petitions have a chequered history inasmuch as a total ofsix writ petitions (including the present petitions) have been filed in respect of the same cause of action. The factual background is set out briefly hereunder.2...
Gaurav Dalmia vs Deputy Director of Income Tax Investigation Unit 2 (3 ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~22 and 23* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 27.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 8352/2025 GAURAV DALMIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Kumar and Ms. Shagun Chopra, Advs.versusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INVESTIGATION UNIT 2 (3) DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv. + W.P.(C) 11710/2025 & CM APPL. 47981/2025 MRIDU HARI DALMIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Kumar and Ms. Shagun Chopra, Advs.versusBUREAU OF IMMIGRATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ishkaran Singh Bhandari, CGSC and Mr. Piyush Yadav, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Pal (GP) for UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (ORAL)1. By way of instant writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the respondents action of issuin...
State Bank of India & Anr. vs Shri Sunder Lal Bhatti & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13819/2021 & CM APPL. 43613/2021 STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Kapur, Mr. Surya Prakash & Ms. Smruthi Santha, Advs.versusSHRI SUNDER LAL BHATTI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Anuj P. Agarwal, Mr Gaurav Verma and Mr Vipul Singh, Advs. Mr. T.P. Singh, Adv. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.02.20261. The petition is for setting aside Minutes of Hearing dated05.10.2021 issued by the respondent no. 2-National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) passed upon a representation filed by respondent no. 1. On the basis of the said minutes dated 05.10.2021, the NCSC has issued communication dated 21.10.2021 summoning the Chairman of the petitioner-bank.2. Respondent no. 1, seems to have been an employee of the petitioner-bank, and as per the recommendations of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), disciplinar...
Randhir Kumar Singh vs Manjeet Solanki
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 27th February, 2026 + CM(M) 1138/2025 & CM APPL. 68427/2025 RANDHIR KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms. Neelampreet, Mr. Abhiroop Rathore and Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Advocates along with Petitioner in person.versusMANJEET SOLANKI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate along with Respondent in person. Mr. Sharique Hussain and Ms. Kirti Garg, Advocate for R-BSES (Through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950 assailing the order dated 26thApril, 2025, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS SCJ No. 1843/2024, whereby the application of the petitioner/ plaintiff for restoration of the electricity has been dismissed.3. I have heard the learned counsel fo...
Vikas vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 13.01.2026Pronounced on: 27.02.2026+ CRL.A. 414/2021 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 2407/2025 VIKAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ashwin Vaish, Mr.V Thomas, Mr.Uttam Panwar, Ms.Shubhi, Ms.Yashaswi Dasari, Ms.Aaditya Sharma, Advs.versusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with Mr.Manvendra Yadav, Mr.Atiq Ur Rehman, Advs. and SI Rahul Rathi, PS Sangam Vihar. Ms.Tara Narula, Ms.Shivangi Sharma, Mr.Shivanjali Bhalerao, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAJUDGMENTNAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. The appellant has approached this Court by way of the present appeal, assailing the Order dated 27.09.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-04 (POCSO), South District, Saket Courts Digitally Signed CRL.A. 414/2021 Page 1 of 33Complex, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Trial Court) in Sessions Case No. 127/2019, titled State v. Vikas, arising out of FIR No. 56...
Gaurav Kumar Garg vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 27.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 14963/2021 GAURAV KUMAR GARG .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shrutika Garg, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj, SPC with Mr. Soumyadip Chakraborty, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr. OP Gaggar, Mr. Sachindra Karn, Advs. for R-2 to 5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJ U D G M E N T (ORAL) ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.:1. Through the present Petition, the Petitioner seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari by assailing the correctness of theorder dated 29.06.2021 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order]passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal], whereby OA No.1195/2021 filed by the Petitioner was disposed of with a direction to the Respondents to release the salary for the period during which the Petitioner had actually discharged his duties.2. At the outset, it is pertinent to note t...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »