Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.K. Brothers vs the Managing Director , Central Cottage Industries Co ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2144/2025 V.K. BROTHERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr BS Mathur, Adv.versusTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR , CENTRAL COTTAGE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION OF INDIA (LTD) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Shanker Pandey, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that certain infirmities exist in the Petition as presently filed.2. He accordingly seeks and is granted liberty to withdraw the present Petition and to take such steps as are available under the law.3. Accordingly, the present petition, along with all pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.FEBRUARY 27, 2026/ v/kr/sg This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:10:43...
Keshri Kumar Pandey @ Chaman vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5042/2025 KESHRI KUMAR PANDEY @ CHAMAN .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for State (through V.C.) with Insp. Sandeep and SI Udit, PS Ranhola.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 27.02.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. Matter received on transfer.3. Status report has been filed by the IO, which could not be reflected in the record, but hard copy has been produced in the Court.4. After making some submissions, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks to withdraw the bail application with liberty to file fresh.5. In view of the submission made, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file afresh. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/akcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order...
Cvent Inc vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- (1)(2)(1) Int. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19691/2025 & CM APPL. 82149/2025 CVENT INC .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Shashwat Bajpai and Mr. Mayank Chaturvedi, Advs.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- (1)(2)(1) INT. TAX, NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC and Mr. Sanjeev Menon, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged theorder dated 17.11.2025 (mentioned as 05.09.2025), passed by the Office ofCircle Int Tax 1(2)(1) (hereinafter referred to as the Competent Authority) so also the certificate dated 17.11.2025, whereby the competent authority has issued a tax withholding certificate at the rate of 15% under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961).2. As per the petitioner, it is a non-resident company and a tax residentof the United States of America (for short USA),...
M/S Kmv Projects Ltd vs M/S Hscc India Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2002/2025 M/S KMV PROJECTS LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi & Mr. Rahul Aggarwal, Advs.versusM/S HSCC INDIA LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Debarshi Bhadra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. R. Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra & Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advs. for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.02.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions have no serious objection for referring the matter to arbitration.3. Accordingly, the petition is allowed by appointing Justice Mr. NajmiWaziri (Retd.) (Mobile No.9810097311), with the consent of the parties, as the sole arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes which have arisen between the parties.4. Arbitral proceedings will be held under ...
M/S Kmv Projects Ltd vs M/S Hscc India Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2004/2025 M/S KMV PROJECTS LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi & Mr. Rahul Aggarwal, Advs.versusM/S HSCC INDIA LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Debarshi Bhadra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. R. Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra & Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advs. for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.02.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions have no serious objection for referring the matter to arbitration.3. Accordingly, the petition is allowed by appointing Justice Mr.Siddharth Mridul (Retd.) (Mobile No.9871300042), with the consent of the parties, as the sole arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes which have arisen between the parties.4. Arbitral proceedings will be held un...
Chander Muni vs Devender Kumar Kashyap
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 14/2025&CM APPL. 350/2025 CHANDER MUNI .....Petitioner Through: None.versusDEVENDER KUMAR KASHYAP .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties, let the matter be again called at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/nd/ik At 02:45 P.M.3. At this stage, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/nd/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:19:46...
Vishveshwarya Group of Institutions vs Pharmacy Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18947/2025 & CM APPL. 4472/2026 VISHVESHWARYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh, Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advs.versusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: a) quash the decision letter dated 14.11.2025 issued by Respondent, whereby it has rejected the Petitioners Application seeking Extension of Approval for the D. Pharm and B. Pharm courses for session 2025-26; and b) direct the Respondent, to consequently grant extension of approval to Petitioner institution for the aforesaid D. Pharm and B. pharm courses, for the academic session 2026-27;...2. The decision dated 14.11.2025 shows blatant and malafide misuse/ abuse of the process of law...
Punam Seth vs Swati Tandon
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$-* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIBEFOREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV+ CS(OS) 1481/2013 & CC 57/2014 MRS. PUNAM SETH W/O MR. UTTAM SETH R/O 42, WHITE SWAN ROAD, MT. ROSKILL, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND. .....PLAINTIFF (Through: Mr. Jitendra Singh Bhasin, Ms. Rashmi Priya, Mr. Nishant Shokeen, Mr. Manoj Rajan Sinha, Mr. Anand Singh, Ms. Kritika Anand and Mr. Yash Bhardwaj, Advs.)VersusMS. SWATI TANDON D/O LATE PUNEET TANDON R/O 142-E, POCKET-IV, MAYUR VIHAR, PHASE-I, NEW DELHI. ....DEFENDANT (Through: Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advs.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % Reserved on: 15.12.2025Pronounced on: 27.02.2026----------------------------------------------------------------------------------JUDGMENTThe present suit has been filed on behalf of Mrs. Punam Seth (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) against Ms. Swati Tandon 10:52:31 1 KUMAR KAURAV(hereinafter referred to as the ...
Bimla Thakur Prop. Jatayu Enterprises Services vs State Bank of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 15/2026, EX.APPL.(OS) 69/2026 & EX.APPL.(OS) 70/2026 BIMLA THAKUR PROP. JATAYU ENTERPRISES SERVICES .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi and Mr. Hardik Sharma, Advs. M: 9990011586 Email: [email protected] BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Karn Kumar & Ms. Nikki Kaur, Advs. M: 9818067500 Email: [email protected]:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsels appearing for the parties jointly submit that the matter stands settled.2. Learned counsel appearing for the decree holder confirms the fact that the decree holder has received the amount in terms of the settlement agreement between the parties. He further submits that the decree is satisfied.3. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/KR...
Chattar Singh vs Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 458/2009 CHATTAR SINGH .....Appellant Through: Ms. Juhi Arora, Adv.versusGOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Pradeep Kumar, PS KM pur.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 27.02.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. It has been reported by the learned APP that the death of the Appellant-Chattar Singh has been verified and the verification report is there on record.3. In view of the fact that the learned counsel for the Appellant has clarified the LRs of the Appellant do not want to continue with the appeal, therefore, appeal stands abated. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/psThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:39:35...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »