Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharambir Thakur & Anr vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 23.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2026+ CRL.A. 499/2018 DHARAMBIR THAKUR & ANR. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhansu Palo, Advocate with Mr. Surinder Roy, Mr. Rajesh Palo and Mr. Mihir Kumar Jena, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State.JUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., theaccused persons, two in number, in Sessions Case No.2050/2016 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge-04 and Special Judge (NDPS), South-East District, Saket Courts, Delhi, challenge thejudgement dated 27.02.2018 and order on sentence dated28.02.2018, as per which they have been convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the NDPS Act). CRL.A. 499/2018 Page 1 of 342. The prosecution case is that on 24.07.2012at 10:30P.M.,both the accu...
Chunni Lal & Ors vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 268/2018 CHUNNI LAL & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ritik Singh, AdvocateVersusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sahaj Garg, SPC with Mr.Deepansh Sharma, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 27.02.20261. The present appeal is preferred under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment dated 05.02.2018 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi in OA (IIu) No. appellants (legal heirs of the deceased) was dismissed.2. Briefly, the claim application was filed stating that the deceased,Bharat, along with two other companions, had undertaken a journey on 01.10.2016 from New Delhi to Ludhiana by Shan-e-Punjab Express after purchasing a valid journey ticket bearing No. 11VIBND178. While the train was passing through Holambi Kalan, on account of a sudden jerk, the deceased fell from the moving train and suffered injuries. He was taken to the hospital. ...
Sarla & Ors vs Ombir & Ors ( M/S the Magma Hdi , Gen. Insurance Co Ltd ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~11 & 12* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 629/2018 SARLA & ORS .....Appellants OMBIR & ORS ( M/S THE MAGMA HDI , GEN. INSURANCE CO LTD ) .....Respondents + MAC.APP. 502/2019, CM APPL. 19825/2019 & CM APPL. M/S CHEMI TECH ENGINEER PVT LTD .....Appellant SARLA & ORS (MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) .....Respondents Appearances: Mr. Ved Vyas Tripathi, Mr. Vaibhav Verma, Advocates for R-5 item No. 11 and for R-6 in item 12. Mr. Umesh Chandra Mishra, Advocate for appellant in item No. 11 and for R-1 in item 12. Ms. Tina Garg, M. K. Ghosh Advocates for M/s Chemitech ltd, R-2 in item no. 11 and petitioner in item 12.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 27.02.20261. The MAC.APP. 629/2018 has been filed by claimant, the mother of the deceased, who had passed away in the accident on 16th March 2018. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) had allowed the claim petition, being MACT No. 14338/2015, and awarded compensation of Rs. 1...
Punjab & Sind Bank vs Ramesh Chandra Semwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19th January, 2026 Date of Decision: 27th February, 2026 Uploaded on: 27th February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 6918/2014, CM APPL. 16302/2014, CM APPL. 41674/2016 PUNJAB & SIND BANK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Niraj Kumar & Mr. Sourabh Mahila, Advs.versusRAMESH CHANDRA SEMWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hunny Singh and Mr. Ankit Parindiyal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAINJUDGMENTSHAIL JAIN, J.1. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of theConstitution of India, inter-alia, assailing the Award dated 09.06.2014 (hereinafter Impugned Award) passed by Ld. Central Government Industrial Tribunal II, New Delhi (hereinafter CGIT) answering the reference in negative terms holding the termination of the Respondent/Workman to be void and that the Respondent/Workman is entitled for reinstatement with regularization of his services as Orderly/ Dafta...
Krishan Prasad Sharma vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 1258/2013 KRISHAN PRASAD SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Adv. (through VC) from DHCLSC.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State (through VC) along with Mr.Arsalan Naik and Mr.Siddhaartha Goyal, Advs. SI Shilpy Gupta PS South Campus.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 27.02.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant stated that Appellant has completed his sentence and the nominal roll substantiates this fact.3. The Appellant is resident of Nepal and the record, either with the Court or with the police, does not have any address of Nepal.4. Report on the process issued suggests that Appellant is not availableat the local address and ultimately it has been submitted upon by both prosecution and learned counsel for Appellant (appearing through VC) that the matter may be disposed of.5. In such circumstances there appears no reason to keep the app...
Dhruv Varma & Anr vs J K Varma & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 19.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: 28.03.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 DHRVU VARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners J K VARMA & ANR. .....Respondent + CRL.REV.P. 724/2014 DHRUV VARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners J K VARMA & ANR. .....Respondents + CRL.REV.P. 725/2014 DHRUV VARMA & ANR. ....Petitioners Signature Not Verified CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 & connected matters Page 1 of 6 J K VARMA & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J CRL.M.(BAIL) 540/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 CRL.M.(BAIL) 546/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 724/2014 CRL.M.A. 7986/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 725/20141. By way of the present applications preferred under Section 389of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) / Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. / Section 528 of the BNSS, the applicant seek...
Dhruv Varma & Anr vs J K Varma & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 19.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: 28.03.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 DHRVU VARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners J K VARMA & ANR. .....Respondent + CRL.REV.P. 724/2014 DHRUV VARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners J K VARMA & ANR. .....Respondents + CRL.REV.P. 725/2014 DHRUV VARMA & ANR. ....Petitioners Signature Not Verified CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 & connected matters Page 1 of 6 J K VARMA & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J CRL.M.(BAIL) 540/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 CRL.M.(BAIL) 546/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 724/2014 CRL.M.A. 7986/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 725/20141. By way of the present applications preferred under Section 389of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) / Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. / Section 528 of the BNSS, the applicant seek...
Dhrvu Varma & Anr vs J K Varma & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 DHRVU VARMA & ANR .....Petitioner + CRL.REV.P. 724/2014 + CRL.REV.P. 725/2014CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 19.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 8049/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 CRL.M.A. 8068/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 724/2014 CRL.M.A. 7987/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 725/20141. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of. CRL.M.(BAIL) 540/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 723/2014 CRL.M.(BAIL) 546/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 724/2014 CRL.M.A. 7986/2026 in CRL.REV.P. 725/20143. Arguments heard.4. Judgment reserved.5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MARCH 19, 2026/rr/R...
Shri Narayan and Co & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 112/2026 & CM APPL. 589/2026 SHRI NARAYAN AND CO & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikrant Nilesh Goyal, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Mr. Kunal Dixit, Mr. Piyush Wadhwa and Ms. Khyaati Bansal, Advocates for UOI Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj, Advocate for R-3 and R-4 Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Sharma and Mr. Nikhil Sharma, AdvocatesCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER % 26.02.20261. On instructions, a prayer for withdrawal is made as prima facie it is noticed that this Court does not have territorial jurisdiction. 2. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to canvas the grievance before the Court having territorial jurisdiction. 3. Pending application also stands disposed of.This is a digitally signed...
Jcl Infra Pvt Ltd vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 55/2026 & I.A. 941/2026 JCL INFRA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faiyaz Hasan & Mr. Nadeem Khan, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC with Ms. Saxena, Adv. (through VC)CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 26.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by nine months as prayed for. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »