Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rubi Devi and Anr vs the New India Assurance Com. Ltd. and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 10th April 2026 Pronounced on: 30th April 2026 Uploaded on : 30th April 2026 + MAC.APP. 397/2022 RUBI DEVI AND ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Aastha Chauchan, Advocates.versusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COM. LTD. AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sahil Paul & Mr. Sandeep Dayal, Advocates for respondent no.1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the legal representatives of thedeceased/Durga, assailing the judgment dated 03rd August 2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi (MACT/Tribunal) in MAC Petition No. 306/2018.2. The incident relates to an accident which occurred on 19 th February2018 at about 8:00 AM, when Durga Kumari (deceased) was playing with other children along the roadside, i.e. service road near construction site of Ahluwalia Contractors India Ltd., Narela, Delhi and was suddenl...
Shakuntala Devi & Ors. vs Vimal Kumar @Lala & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ EX.P. 59/2024 SHAKUNTALA DEVI & ORS. .....Decree Holders Through: Decree Holders in person.versusVIMAL KUMAR @LALA & ORS. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal & Mr. Ritual Sharma, Advs. for JD. Mr. Pushpendra Verma & Mr. Karan Chibber, Advs. for Applicant/ Objector.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.02.2026 EX.APPL.(OS) 268/20261. This application is filed for early hearing of the case.2. The matter is fixed for 09.04.2026. In the application, it is contended that that parties are ready to settle the matter.3. In view of the above, the application is allowed and the date of hearing is preponed to today. EX.P. 59/20244. The parties are present in Court and requests that they be sent to the Mediation Centre today itself.5. In view of above, let the parties appear before the Mediation Centre of this Court today i.e., 27.02.2026, as prayed for.6. Put up before Court after culmination of me...
Sushma & Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~18 &19* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5810/2025 & CRL.M.A. 24837/2025 SANJAY DAMEER & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Makkar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Mr. Samar Pratap, Advocate. SI Jitender Mr. Prem Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2. + CRL.M.C. 5815/2025 & CRL.M.A. 24843/2025 SUSHMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prem Singh, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Mr. Samar Pratap, Advocate SI Jitender. Mr. Himanshu Makkar Advocate for respondent No. 2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. The present petitions are filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing ofCRL.M.C. 5810/2025 & CRL.M.C. 5815/2025 Page 1 of 7 two cross-FIRs, be...
Ram Dulare Yadav@ Gandhi Bhai vs Kapil Goel
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3122/2024 & CM APPL. 44998/2024 RAM DULARE YADAV@ GANDHI BHAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjuman Tripathy, AoR with Mr. Mohit Singh Sikarwar, Advs. (through VC)versusKAPIL GOEL .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous, as the disputes between the parties have been settled. Accordingly, it is prayed that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/sds/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code...
Shama Jaswal & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ TEST.CAS. 74/2025 SHAMA JASWAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Adv. (Through VC)versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sweety Sood, Adv. for SBI (Through VC) Mr. Anushav Gupta, PC (Civil) and Mr. Siddharth Arora, Adv. for R-1CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 27.02.20261. The present petition had been filed under Section 278 of the IndianSuccession Act, 1925 (Succession Act), seeking grant of Letters of Administration, in respect of Locker No. 150, situated at State Bank of India, Jwalaheri Branch, Paschim Vihar, Delhi-110063, belonging to Late Smt. C.K. Jagota (deceased mother of the petitioner).2. There was a prayer for appointment of a Local Commissioner (LC) for opening of the locker and inventorying its contents.3. Accordingly, the LC was appointed by this Court vide order dated 06th November, 2025 to visit the premises of respondent no. 2-Bank for opening the ...
Samsuddin vs Usman Ali
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 101/2024 SAMSUDDIN .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given..versusUSMAN ALI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 19.03.2026 CM APPL. 17144/2026 (CM For Restoration)1. Application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking restoration of the Appeal, which got dismissed in default vide Order dated 27.02.2026.2. On filing PF, Notice be issued to the Respondent by all permissible modes, returnable for 03.08.2026.3. List on 03.08.2026.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.MARCH 19, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 11:03:16...
Jitender@ Babu vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 4h February, 2026 Pronounced on: 27th February, 2026 Uploaded on: 27th February, 2026 + CRL.A. 1008/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1546/2025 JITENDER@BABU .....Appellant Through: Ms. Indu Kaul, Mr. Abhishek Sahu & Mr. Vikram Kaul, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri APP with Ms. Divya Yadav & Mr. Lalit Luthra, Advs. (M: 9999892015) with SI Deepak Malik, Inspector Mukesh Kumar PS Barakhamba Road. (M: 8130302556)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINJUDGMENTMADHU JAIN, J.1. The present criminal appeal is filed under Section 415(2) of BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter, BNSS) by the Appellant assailing the Impugned Judgement of conviction and order on sentence dated 23rd April, 2025 and 26th April, 2025 respectively, passed by the ld. ASJ-04, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, whereby the Appellant has been convicted in Sessions Case No...
Navlendra Kumar Singh vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 07.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2026Judgment uploaded on: 27.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 10453/2025 and CM APPL. 43406/2025 NAVLENDRA KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Rawal, Sr. Adv. along with Ms. Rishika, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Premtosh K Mishra, CGSC along with Mr. Shrey Sharma and Mr. Anubhav Upadhyay, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.:1. Through the present Petition, the Petitioner assails thecorrectness of the judgment dated 08.07.2021 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Judgment] passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as CAT], whereby O.A. No.322/2020 filed by the Petitioner was dismissed, while refusing to interfere with the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority ordering reduction of present time scale of pay to the lower time...
M/S Sai Fertilizers Private Limited vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 9060/2024 , CM APPLs.37030/2024, & 55432/2025 M/S SAI FERTILIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan (Sr. Advocate) along with Mr. Sahil Monga, Mr. Shashank Sharma, Mr. Shrudhar Kale, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA ......Respondent Through: Ms. Gauri Goburdhun (SPC) for UOI. + W.P.(C) 11099/2024, CM APPLs.45878/2024 & 68374/2024 M/S SAI FERTILIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan (Sr. Advocate) along with Mr. Sahil Monga, Mr. Shashank Sharma, Mr. Shrudhar Kale, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA ......Respondent Through: Ms. Gauri Goburdhun (SPC) for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAJUDGMENT1. The present petitions have a chequered history inasmuch as a total ofsix writ petitions (including the present petitions) have been filed in respect of the same cause of action. The factual background is set out briefly hereunder.2...
Manoj Swami Decd. Thr. Seema Swami vs State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 23.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2026+ CRL.A. 1376/2010 MANOJ SWAMI DECD. THR. SEEMA SWAMI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Narender Mann, AdvocateversusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. This appeal under Section 378 (4) of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the legal heir of the complainant in Complaint Case No. 925/1/09 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Patiala House Courts, Delhi assailing the order dated 13.08.2009 by which the complaint filed alleging commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, (the N.I Act) has been dismissed for default. CRL.A. 1376/2010 Page 1 of 52. The complaint alleging the commission of the offencepunishable under Section 138 of the NI Act was filed before the Additional ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »