Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ankit Sharma vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11122/2025 & CM APPL. 45746/2025 ANKIT SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Advocate through VC (appearance not given).versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar Khanna, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Mamta Garg and Ms. Mukta Garg and Mr. Vishal, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to therespondent no.1 with respect to the unauthorised construction being carried out in the property bearing no. X/3126, Gali No. 4, Raghubarpura No. 2, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-110031, measuring 100 sq. yds.2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent no.2,who is the owner of the property in question, has started raising unauthorised commercial construction, without obtaining any sanctioned building plan approved from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD).3. It is submitted that the house...
Neha Dhanda vs Directorate of Education & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15821/2023 & CM APPL. 63620-63621/2023 NEHA DHANDA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dushyant Kumar, Advocate.versusDIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 27.02.20261. Mr. Dushyant Kumar, counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions states that he would like to withdraw the petition.2. Dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications. SANJEEV NARULA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/hcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:58:55...
Shanu@ Shan Mohammad & Ors. vs State Govt of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6587/2024 SHANU@ SHAN MOHAMMAD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counsel Mr. Haider Ali, Mr. Anand Paul, Mr. Saurabh Arora, Mr. Manjeet Kumar, Mr. Devendra Sharma, Ms. Vanita, Ms. Nazreen, Ms. Nigar, Mr. Rizwan, Mr. Asif Ahmad, Mr Mohd Amit and Mr. Shaihzad, Advs.versusSTATE GOVT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Manoj Pant, APP for the State along with ASI Pramod Kumar. R-2 with his counselCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 415/2024, registered at Police Station Dayal Pur, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 110/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter 'BNS).2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer(IO) from Police Station Daya...
Manish Paswan & Anr. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6447/2024 MANISH PASWAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Appearance not givenversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Puja Mann and Mr. Sandeep Sinhmar, Advocates alongwith SI Himani, PS Gandhi Nagar Mr. Nitesh Saini, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 24649/2024 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of CRL.M.C. 6447/2024 & CRL.M.A. 24648/20243. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 592/2022, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 363/366/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 (hereafter IPC').4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State5. All the peti...
Mridu Hari Dalmia vs Bureau of Immigration & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~22 and 23* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 27.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 8352/2025 GAURAV DALMIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Kumar and Ms. Shagun Chopra, Advs.versusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INVESTIGATION UNIT 2 (3) DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv. + W.P.(C) 11710/2025 & CM APPL. 47981/2025 MRIDU HARI DALMIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Kumar and Ms. Shagun Chopra, Advs.versusBUREAU OF IMMIGRATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ishkaran Singh Bhandari, CGSC and Mr. Piyush Yadav, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Pal (GP) for UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (ORAL)1. By way of instant writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the respondents action of issuin...
Pankaj Karna & Anr. vs Maple Growth Partners & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1001/2025 & I.A. 23569/2025 PANKAJ KARNA & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin, Mr. Ekansh Bansal, Mr. Syed Sarfaraz Karim and Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocates.versusMAPLE GROWTH PARTNERS & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Mr. Anish Jandial and Ms. Priyanshi Bhageria, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking a decree ofpermanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from offering services, advertising, promoting and/or using, in any manner whatsoever, the impugned trademark/corporate name/ abbreviation mark deceptively and/or confusingly similar to Plaintiffs registered Maple Capital Advisors, Maple Capital and Maple Advisors, trademarks/corporate name and/or from passing off, unfair competition, etc., amongst other reliefs.2. During the pendency of the suit, parties ...
Delhi Development Authority vs Sachin Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12550/2025 and CM APPL. 51173/2025 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Mr. D. Sharma, Advs.versusSACHIN KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 27.02.20261. A perusal of the record reflects that the certified copy of theOrder dated 27.02.2025 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order]passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as CAT] which has been placed on record by the Petitioner is incomprehensible. The Impugned Order is concluded at printed page no. 40 of the paper book, while printed page no. 41 vaguely begins with some Para no. 2 going up to page 57 but there is no conclusion.2. A perusal of the Impugned Order reflects that CAT has taken uptwo Original Applications (OA) bearing Nos.2266/2023 and issue. ...
Sanjay Dameer & Anr. vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~18 &19* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5810/2025 & CRL.M.A. 24837/2025 SANJAY DAMEER & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Makkar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Mr. Samar Pratap, Advocate. SI Jitender Mr. Prem Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2. + CRL.M.C. 5815/2025 & CRL.M.A. 24843/2025 SUSHMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prem Singh, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with Mr. Samar Pratap, Advocate SI Jitender. Mr. Himanshu Makkar Advocate for respondent No. 2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. The present petitions are filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing ofCRL.M.C. 5810/2025 & CRL.M.C. 5815/2025 Page 1 of 7 two cross-FIRs, be...
Aakash Educational Services Limited vs Centre for Philosophical Pursui ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1376/2025 AAKASH EDUCATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Manasi Chatpalliwar, Mr. Pranav Proothi and Mr. Anshveer Singh Nalwa, Advocates Mob: 9560205151 Email: [email protected] FOR PHILOSOPHICAL PURSUIT & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anu Shrivastava, Advocate (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 27.02.20261. Mediation Report dated 25thFebruary, 2026 has been received, as per which, the matter is not-settled.2. Learned counsels appearing for the parties submit that the parties are ad idem that the matter can be referred to an Arbitrator.3. This Court notes that the disputes between the parties in the presentcase emanate out of a Service Agreement dated 02ndJune, 2022 (Service Agreement) executed between the parties. By way of the aforesaid Service Agreement, the petitioner had engaged the respondents as a service provider, in order to provide hostel and allie...
Naresh Kumar Jain vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6231/2025 NARESH KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chirag Khurana, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for StateCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL. M.A. 6556/2026 (withdrawal)1. By way of the present application, the petitioner seeks permissionto withdraw the captioned petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties before the Trial Court, in view of the matter having been remitted to the Trial Court for consideration by the impugned judgment dated 02.06.2025.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.3. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6231/20254. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.5. The next date of hearing, i.e. 11.05.2026, stands cancelled. PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/SV/SD/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the o...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »