Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amar Pal vs State(Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 19.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2026Judgment uploaded on: 28.02.2026+ W.P. (CRL) 2980/2025 AMAR PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Chopra, (DHCLSC), Mr. Shravan Pandey, Ms. Surbhi Arora and Ms. Shivani Kaushik, AdvocatesversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr Kshitiz Garg and Mr Anshul Sharma, AdvocatesCORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction,order for quashing the rejection order no. F.10(3800430)/CJ/LEGAL/PHQ/2025/4376, dated 05.08.2025, passed by the Director General (Prisons) and further seeks grant of furlough for a period of three weeks. W.P.(CRL) 2980/2025 Page 1 of 82. The facts, as apparent from the records, are that the petitionerherein is presently...
Danone Asia Pacific Holdings Pte. Ltd. vs M/S Supercure Biotech Privat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 908/2024 & I.A. 43057/2024 DANONE ASIA PACIFIC HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. M.S. Bharath, Mr. Ayush Sharma, Mr. Krishna V.S. and Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocates.versusM/S SUPERCURE BIOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Aditya Shankar Prasad, Ms. Poorvi Shukla and Mr. Prateek Raj, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 27.02.2026 I.A. 5525/20261. This application is jointly filed on behalf of the parties under OrderXXIII Rule 3 CPC for recording the settlement arrived at between the parties.2. This suit was instituted by the Plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining Defendants from using marks PROTILEX/, which infringe Plaintiffs registered trademark PROTINEX and its formative marks as also from infringing Plaintiffs trade dress/ logos/labels and artworks and/or passing off, amongst other reliefs.3. During the pendency of the suit, parties...
Malhotra Surgical Industries vs Yogesh Chauhan & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1071/2024 and I.As. 46944/2024, 46947/2024 MALHOTRA SURGICAL INDUSTRIES .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Abhay Aren and Ms. Surabhi Pande, Advocates.versusYOGESH CHAUHAN & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Mishal Vij, Mr. Bhagirath Mandaliya and Ms. Heena Mahayavanshi Advocates for D-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from using the impugned trademark/trade dress MICROTONESTETHOSCOPE/ and/or any other deceptively similar mark in relation to any surgical equipment and medical appartus products, amounting to infringement of Plaintiffs registered trademarks MICRO- TONE STETHOSCOPE/ and , amongst other reliefs.2. During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred to the Delhi CS(COMM) 1071/2024 Page 1 of 2High Court Mediation a...
Haider Ali vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3735/2025 HAIDER ALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aadil Jameel, Adv.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) ...Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Puja Mann and Mr. SAndeep Sinhmar, Advs. along with SI Dinesh Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present bail application.2. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:13:28...
Ravinder Kumar @ Foji vs the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4427/2025 RAVINDER KUMAR @ FOJI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP with Ins. Kaushlesh KumarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 27.02.20261. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for applicant,without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present application at this stage. He, however, seeks liberty to file application at the subsequent stage, as and when need so arises.2. The application stands disposed of as not pressed.3. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.4. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. MANOJ JAIN, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/sw/jsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:18:21...
Aniket @ Abhi vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~2 and 3* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3857/2025 ANIKET @ ABHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sheetal, AdvocateversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State with with SI Sandeep AATS/East District + BAIL APPLN. 3989/2025 ISHANT @ ISHU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Teotia, AdvocateversusSTATE G.N.C.T OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State with SI Sandeep AATS/East District.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of the present applications, the applicants seek regular bailin connection with FIR No. 159/2025 dated 05.04.2025, registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar Phase 1, District East, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1)/326(f)/125/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [BNS], read with Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. BAIL APPLN. 3857/2025 & 3989/2025 Page 1 of 62. As both the applications arise out of the same FI...
Anita Yadav vs Shailesh Jain & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 4041/2024, CM APPL. 72236/2024 & CM APPL. 72237/2024 ANITA YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Mishra, Adv.versusSHAILESH JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R. K. Jain and Mr. Anurodh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Umesh Mishra and Mr. Kartikay Yadav, Advs. For R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the matter hasbeen settled between the petitioner and respondent no. 1, as per the settlement dated 09th December, 2025. In view of the said settlement, learned counsel submits that the present petition may be disposed of.3. The settlement deed dated 09th December, 2025 has been placed on record. Paragraph 2 of the said settlement reads as under: 2. That both the parties shall make a request to the Hon'bleHigh Court of Delhi to dispose of CM (M) No. 4041/2024titled as Anita Ya...
Naim vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4508/2025 NAIM .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for the State with Inspector Subhash Chandra, Cyber Cell.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.2026 Crl.M.A. No. 6601/2026 (for withdrawal) & BAIL APPLN. 4508/20251. The applicant has filed the present application seeking withdrawal of the captioned bail application.2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application, without prejudice to the applicants rights and remedies in the pending criminal proceedings.3. The application is allowed.4. Accordingly, the application seeking grant of regular bail inconnection with FIR No. 207/2025, registered at Police Station Crime Branch for the offences punishable under Sections 20/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, is dismissed as withdrawn.5. It is made clear that this Cour...
Om Prakash Jain vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8824/2024 OM PRAKASH JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Khatri, AdvocateversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Pankaj Kasana, PS Anand ViharCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 33737/2024 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 33738/20243. By way of the present application, petitioner seeks condonation ofdelay of 03 days in re-filing the present petition. In view of the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 03 days in re-filing the present petition stands condoned.4. Application stands disposed of CRL.M.C. 8824/20245. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIRbearing no. 272/2024, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, New Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 406/420/120B of Indian Penal Code,...
Tanishq Agencies & Anr. vs M/S Ventura International Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 10th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 27th February, 2026 + RFA(COMM) 665/2025, CAV 461/2025, CM APPL. 74948/2025, CM APPL. 74949/2025 & CM APPL. 74950/20251. TANISHQ AGENCIES,No. 3 GRD FLR. KAVERI ROYAL APT. SWARN JAYANTI NAGAR, RAMQHAT ROAD, ALIGARH- 202001, UTTAR PRADESH. THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR/AR- SMT. NEHA GUPTA, ALSO AT: 2/614, RMBAGH COLONY, GALI NO. 3, RAMGHAT ROAD, ALIGARH, UTTAR PRADESH.2. TANISHQ AGENCIES,No. 3 GRD FLR. KAVERI ROYAL APT. SWARN JAYANTI NAGAR, RAMGHAT ROAD, ALIGARH- 202001, UTTAR PRADESH . THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR/AR MR. RAJNEESH VARSHNEY (RAJA). .....APPELLANTS Through: Mr. Amish Tiwari, Adv.versusM/S VENTURA INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD AT.1/120, FIRST FLOOR, WHS, KIRTI NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110015. THROUGH ITS FINANCE CONTROLLER Signing Date:27.02.2026 RFA(COMM) 665/2025 Page1 of 23 SH. SANJAY AGARWAL. .....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Karan Sinha, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HONBLE MR. JUSTIC...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »