Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 28 of about 750 results (0.009 seconds)Union of India vs.m/s Parnika Commercial & Estates Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~26 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. 02.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 39/2019 & CM APPL. 7719-7721/2019 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Singh & Mr. Rakesh versus Kumar, Advocates M/S PARNIKA COMMERCIAL & ESTATES PVT LTD Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 27.09.2018 by which an application being IA102622018 seeking condonation of 689 days delay in filing a petition under Section 34 of the Act has been rejected.2. The necessary facts required to be noticed for disposal of this appeal are mentioned below.3. The appellant vide notice dated 05.10.2005 floated a tender for the work of Construction of two new high-le...
Tag this Judgment!Aditya Khurana and Anr vs.the Principal Aryabhatta College & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~20, 46, 48 and 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8779/2018 & CM APPL. 33767/2018 W.P.(C) 8782/2018 & CM APPL. 33772/2018 W.P.(C) 12796/2018 & CM APPLs. 49667-49668/2018 W.P.(C) 9205/2018 & CM APPL. 8067/2019 MOHIT WADHWA AND ORS. MUSKAN GOEL AND ORS. MANIK GUPTA AND ORS. ADITYA KHURANA AND ANR .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Adv. with Ms. Sushila and Mr. M.P.Singh, Adv. Mr. Yashu Khurana, Adv. THE PRINCIPAL ARYABHATTA COLLEGE & ANR versus .... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. with Mr. Akash Yadav, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv. for University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % W.P.(C) 8779/2018, W.P.(C) 12796/2018 & W.P.(C) 9205/2018 1. The petitioners in these cases are students pursuing various courses in the Aryabhatta College (Respondent No.1 herein and W.P.(C) 8779/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 referred to, he...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and Ors vs.tushar Ranjan Mohanty
Court: Delhi
$~10. * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10816/2016 & CM APPL. 11300/2018 Date of Decision :19. 02.2019 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.V. Singha, Mr.A.S. Singha and Mr. Amit Sinha, Advs. versus TUSHAR RANJAN MOHANTY ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) 1. The Union of India has filed this writ petition alongwith three other petitioners, namely, Prof. TCA Anant (Petitioner No.2), Mr. Swapan Kumar Das (Petitioner No.3) and Mr. A.K. Bhatia (Petitioner No.4) to assail the order dated 27.11.2015 passed by the Central Industrial Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) in OA No.1973/2014.2. Vide the impugned order, the Tribunal allowed the said Original Application preferred by the respondent-applicant, and held that the Annual Performance Assessment Report (APAR) of the respondent was vitiated, on W.P.(C) 10816/2016 Page 1 of 13 acc...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. Rita Biswas vs.state (Govt. Of Nct, Delhi) &Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 02.2019 TEST. CAS. 32/2017 $~OS-5 * % + MRS. RITA BISWAS ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Santosh K. Sethi, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI) &ANR ..... Defendant Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed this present petition under section 276 of the Indian Succession Act seeking grant of probate in favour of the petitioner with respect to the will dated 08.12.2015 which was executed by Late Smt Renuka Guha (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) who has expired on 19.12.2015 in New Delhi 2. It has been averred in the petition that the deceased was the wife of Late Sh. Subimal Guha who pre-deceased her and mother of the petitioner and respondent No.2.3. The matter first came up for hearing before this court on 30.05.2017, where notice was issued to the respondents. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 accepted notice and was directed to file the valuation rep...
Tag this Judgment!Shahid Khan vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 02.2019 CRL.REV.P. 182/2019 & Crl.M.A.3569-3570/2019 SHAHID KHAN versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Nasimuddin, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 20.12.2018 whereby the Trial Court has fixed the maintenance of Rs.9000/- per month from the date of filing of the petition.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is earning about Rs.28,000/- and after statutory deductions, his take home salary is Rs.27,000/- per month. It is contended that petitioner has a dependant mother and a younger brother and is also required to spend about Rs.6,000/- per month towards conveyance which has not been taken by the Trial Court. He submits that an ad interim CRL.REV.P.182/2019 Page 1 o...
Tag this Judgment!Swift Securitas (P) Ltd vs.gulshan Sharma and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) No.6825/2017 SWIFT SECURITAS (P) LTD versus ..... PETITIONER Through Mr.Arun Mehta, Adv. with Mr.Prabha Mishra, Adv. ..... RESPONDENTS Through Mr.R.S. Jena, Adv. with Mr.Sonu Kumar, Adv. for R-1 & 3. Mr.Nitin Sen, Adv. for R-2. GULSHAN SHARMA AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/management has impugned the order dated 23rd May, 2017 as also the order dated 4th July, 2017, passed by the learned Labour Court XIX in LIR No.5609/2016, whereunder the Court has declined to treat the issue regarding the legality and validity of the domestic enquiry framed by it as a preliminary issue.2. The brief facts as emerge from the record are that the respondent no.1 who had joined the services of petitioner/organization from 19th April, 2012, raised an industrial dispute on the ground th...
Tag this Judgment!Sjvn Ltd vs.jaiprakash Hyundai Consortium
Court: Delhi
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgement:18. h February, 2019 + RFA(OS) 15/2019 SJVN LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Uttam Datt & Mr. Vinayak Nair, versus Advocates. CORAM: JAIPRAKASH HYUNDAI CONSORTIUM Through Nemo. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL74382019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL74372019 (delay in filing) 3. By the present application, the applicant/appellant seeks condonation of 94 days delay in filing the present appeal. The cause for the delay has been set out in paras 2 and 3 of the application, which is reproduced below : 2. That the Appellant analysed the impugned said judgment and sought legal opinion on the legality of the judgment and the ground on which it could be challenged. There are three suits in which identical judgments has been passed by the learned single Judge dismissing all t...
Tag this Judgment!Vipin vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 900/2019 KULDEEP MAURYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Singh & Mr. Lokesh, Advocates STATE & ANR. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with ASI Ombir Mr. Jayant Kaushal, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person + CRL.M.C. 910/2019 VIPIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Kaushal, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with ASI Ombir Mr. Sunil Singh & Mr. Lokesh, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.C. 900/2019 & Crl.M.C. 910/2019 Page 1 of 5 In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.605/2015, whereas in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.604/ 2015, both under Sections 354A/323 of IPC, registered at police station Dabri, Delhi is sough...
Tag this Judgment!Crocs Inc Usa vs.action Shoes Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Lakshya vs.the State
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 756/2018 LAKSHYA versus THE STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Advocate. Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Pankaj, P.S.Kirti Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.2124/2018 under Sections 379/4IPC, Police Station Kirti Nagar.2. The subject FIR was registered on the complaint of the owner of the vehicle who stated that he had parked the vehicle in front of his house and subsequently found that the vehicle had been stolen.3. As per the case of the prosecution, the person who had stolen the vehicle approached the complainant and assured recovery of some of the goods which were in the vehicle. The co-accused was apprehended and in his disclosure statement he has named the pet...
Tag this Judgment!