Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 27 of about 750 results (0.021 seconds)Mahender Singh & Anr vs.ranjit Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:19. 02.2019 C.R.P1792018 & CM No.34581/2018 MAHENDER SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Dinesh Lal, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus RANJIT SINGH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate for R1 along with respondent No.1 in person. Respondent No.2 in person. Smt. Amrit Kaur and Smt. Tirpat Kaur, sisters of the petitioners, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 The settlement agreement dated 29.01.2019 has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The petitioners, sisters of petitioners namely Smt. Amrit Kaur and Smt. Tirpat Kaur and respondent No.1 & 2 confirm the mediation settlement.2. The civil suit No.2741/2016 filed by the respondent No.1 stands disposed of in terms of the said settlement. The parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement dated 29.01.2019. C.R.P. 179/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. I...
Tag this Judgment!Anubhav Chand Kathuria vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI33 34 and 35 + W.P.(C) 5822/2018 & CMs 22631/2018, 37292/2018 and 53835/2018 ANUBHAV CHAND KATHURIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Rajesh Yadav and Mr Ruchira, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Padma Priya, Mr Mukesh Kumar and Ms Soumya Priyadarshni, Advocates for NHAI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Ms Tara Narula and Ms Nidhi Nagpal, Advocates of CA. + W.P.(C) 5831/2018 & CMs 22659/2018, 37294/2018 and 53837/2018 ANUBHAV CHAND KATHURIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Rajesh Yadav and Mr Ruchira, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Ms Padma Priya, Mr Mukesh Kumar and Ms Soumya Priyadarshni, Advocates for NHAI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. + W.P.(C) 5846/2018 & CMs 22701/2018, 37293/2018 and 53833/2018 SUBHASH CHAND KATHURIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Rajesh Yadav and Mr Ruchira, W.P.(C) Nos. 582...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Sai Constructions vs.m/s Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h February, 2019 M/S SAI CONSTRUCTIONS O.M.P. 103/2009 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Nayar, Mr. Sarthak Malhotra and Mr. Naman Joshi, Advocates. (M:9958966570 & 9810057280) versus M/S TEHRI HYDRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Laxmi Kumari, Advocates. (M:9810208494) ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) has been preferred challenging the award dated 10th October, 2008 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator. The... Petitioner - M/s Sai Constructions (hereinafter the Contractor) was engaged by Respondent No.1- M/s Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter THDC) for executing works of construction of Pratap Inter College at New Tehri Town. The said college was meant to serve the residents of the Tehri colony, who ...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development and Corporation ...
Court: Delhi
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 60/2019 & I.A. No.1978/2019 (Stay) Date of Decision :19. h February, 2019 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Anusuya Salwan,Ms.Nitika Salwan and Ms.Shreya Sharma, Advs. versus PNC DELHI INDUSTRIAL INFRA. PVT LTD. .... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Kumar and Ms.Arushi Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 05.10.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Concession Agreement dated 19.07.2011 for Redevelopment and Management of Narela Industrial Estate, Delhi. O.M.P.(Comm.) No.60/2019 Page 1 2. PNC Infratech Ltd. was the successful ...
Tag this Judgment!Pawan Kumar Anthony vs.the State
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1429/2017 PAWAN KUMAR ANTHONY THE STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K. Mathur and Mr. S. Gupta, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Anand Pal Mr. K.K. Jha, Adv. for complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.638/2015 under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC, Police Station Sabzi Mandi, Delhi.2. 3.... Petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated 26.07.2017. Learned Addl. PP submits that the investigation is complete and the charge sheet has already been filed. He submits that none of the dowry articles could be recovered.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to return all the admitted articles. Learned counsel for the BAIL APPLN.1429...
Tag this Judgment!Col Anand Swaroop vs.general Bipin Rawat & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~50 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:19. 02.2019 CONT.CAS(C) 126/2019 COL ANAND SWAROOP ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Ms. Devina Sharma, Ms. Vibhuti Sharma, Advs. versus GENERAL BIPIN RAWAT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Col. V.S. Gaur and Major Charul Bhat in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 Mr. Kirtiman Singh, the Central Government Standing Counsel, on instructions, has placed on record a copy of message received from JAG Branch, Headquarter Western Command to the effect that it is clarified as under ALFA (.) confirming authority of the petitioner is GOC-IN-C western command in terms of Para 472 of Regulation for the Army COMMA1987(Revised Edition) BRAVO (.) GCM proceedings were placed before GOC Delhi Area for consideration of revision of findings of GCM. GCM proceedings were placed before GOC Delhi area for consideration of revision of findings Cont. Cas. (C) No.126/2019 Page 1 of 2 of GCM...
Tag this Judgment!Sumnesh Kumar vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2019 SUMNESH KUMAR TEST.CAS. 57/2006 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. D.R. Bhatia and Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advs. Versus STATE & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through : None. ........ RESPONDENTS Probate is sought by the named executor of the document dated 24th 1. April, 2000 claimed to be the validly executed last Will of the Shakuntala Devi, wife of Ratan Lal, resident of C-9, Inder Puri, New Delhi, who died in Mumbai on 23rd October, 2004.2. The petition was entertained and notice and citation thereof ordered to be issued including by publication in the newspaper.3. The order dated 24th March, 2014 records that all the near relatives of the deceased had been served and had filed their no objection.4. Counsel for the petitioner also states that affidavits of no objection have been filed by all the close relatives of the deceased and none has come forward to object to the grant in sp...
Tag this Judgment!Central Warehousing Corporation vs.m/s Vardhaman Precision Profiles an ...
Court: Delhi
$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 760/2012 Date of Decision :19. h February, 2019 CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.K.K. Tyagi & Mr.Iftekhar Ahmad, Advs. versus M/S VARDHAMAN PRECISION PROFILES AND TUBES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil K. Jain, Mr.Punya Garg & Mr.Abhishek Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 29.07.2009 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to Letter of Intent/Work Order dated 06.08.2004 issued by the petitioner in favour of respondent for the construction work of 8580 sq.mts. covered warehouse (design, supplying and erecting pre-fabricated and pre- engineered warehouse) at 30 Ha. Plot, Sector 10, D'Node, Navi Mumbai. O.M...
Tag this Judgment!Vishal Infrastructure Limited vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 122/2018 & IA157322018 Date of Decision :19. h February, 2019 VISHAL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sonal K. Singh, Mr.Ritesh Sharma and Mr.Suraj R.Kesherwani, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.T.P.Singh, Adv. alongwith Mr.I.P. Singh, Dy.Dir(C) and Mr.Satish Kumar, Dy. Dir(C). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 14 read with Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking termination of the mandate of the Arbitrator appointed by the respondent and for appointment of a Substitute Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes OMP (T)(COMM) No.122/2018 Page 1 that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Contract Agreement dated 28.01.2011 awarding the contract for c...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Bilogical E Ltd. & Anr. Vs.national Pharmaceutical Pricing Author ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 3126/2015 & CM Nos. 5576/2015 & 27446/2018 M/S. BILOGICAL E LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus NATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL PRICING AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr Abdullah Hussain, Ms Kanika Nayar, Mr Arjun Nihal Singh and Ms Prerna Parashar. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Sumit Rajput, GP and Mr Aditya Sengar, NPPA for R-1 to 4/UOI. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1... Petitioner no.1 (Biological E Ltd. hereafter the petitioner) is a company, inter alia, engaged in the manufacture and supply of vaccines, which includes a Tetanus Toxoid vaccine. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 14.06.2013 (S.O.No.1673(E) hereafter the impugned notification) passed by the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (hereafter W.P.(C) 3126/2015 ...
Tag this Judgment!