Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 33 of about 750 results (0.011 seconds)Crocs Inc. Usa vs.liberty Shoes Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Ntpc Ltd & Anr vs.m/s Bgr Mining & Infra Ltd
Court: Delhi
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 06, 2019 Judgment delivered on: February 15, 2019 LPA572019, CM No.4359/2019 NTPC LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG with Mr. Puneet Taneja, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Ms. Shaheen and Ms. Laxmi Kumari, Advs. for NTPC M/S BGR MINING & INFRA LTD versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Priya Kumar, Mr. Adhish Srivastava and Mr. Tejas Chhabra, Advs. for R1 & R2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This Intra-Court appeal has been filed by the NTPC Ltd. and another challenging the judgment dated January 21, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.463/2018 where by the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition and directed the appellant NTPC to hold Good Faith Discussions with the respondent herein in terms of Clause 23.1 (b) of the Project Agreement, which shall also be construed as compliance...
Tag this Judgment!Bhupender Narang vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2450/2018 BHUPENDER NARANG STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Sherawat, Advocate. Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the SI Shashi Kumar, PS Shalimar Bagh. State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.321/2018 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Shalimar Bagh.2. On 16.10.2018, learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that despite the petitioner having admitted before the Trial Court that he was in possession of certain dowry articles, he has not returned any of the dowry articles.3. On 16.10.2018, statement of counsel for the petitioner was recorded that he was willing to return all articles which was in his possession except jewellery which was stated to have already been taken away...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash Chandra Khurana & Ors vs.government of National Capital Territ ...
Court: Delhi
+ + * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h February, 2019 % LPA1082019, CM Nos. 7018-7020/2019 SUBHASH CHANDRA KHURANA & ORS Through: Mr. Vivek Chib, Adv. with Ms. Pracheta Kar & Mr. Asif Ahmed, Advs. ..... Appellants versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Varun Kalia, Adv. with Dr. Kiran, Tibbia College LPA1092019, CM Nos. 7031-7033/2019 KULJIT SINGH & ORS Through: Mr. Vivek Chib, Adv. with Ms. Pracheta Kar & Mr. Asif Ahmed, Advs. ..... Appellants versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Varun Kalia, Adv. with Dr. Kiran, Tibbia College CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO W.P.(C) No.Page 1 of 5 V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM Nos. 7019-7020/2019 in LPA1082019 CM Nos. 7032-7033/2019 in LPA1092019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. LPA108...
Tag this Judgment!The Indian School vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1422/2019 & CM APPLs. 6523/2019 (for directions) CM APPL. 6524/2019 (for exemption) % 1. THE INDIAN SCHOOL Through: Mr. ........ Petitioner Gupta, Ms.Vanshika Sethi and Ms. Vrinda Arora, Advs. Pramod versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC with Mr. Chirayu Jain and Ms. Nikita Goyal, Advs. for GNCTD Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC for DOE with Mr. Shashank Tiwari and Mr. Rishabh Ostwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner-School is facing a show cause notice issued to it, on 24th January, 2019, by the Deputy Director of Education (South) (hereinafter referred to as the DDE). The show cause notice emanates from a visit made to the School by the officials of the Directorate of Education (hereinafter referred to as the DOE) on 10th December, 2018, in which, the show cause notice alleges, violations of various...
Tag this Judgment!Maulvi Juned Alam & Ors. Vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 15, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4529/2017 & Crl.M.A. 18098/2017 MAULVI JUNAID ALAM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Saurabh Jhamb & Mr. Vijay Verma, Advocates Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr. Prem Priyavardhan, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.154/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 21st September, 2017 (Annexure- P-4) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.4529/2017 Page 1 of 4 Respondent No....
Tag this Judgment!Narinder Nath Ahuja vs.innovative Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~CP-18 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:15. 02.2019 + CO.PET. 924/2015 versus NARINDER NATH AHUJA INNOVATIVE INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + CO.PET. 932/2015 AND KUSSUM CHADHA AHUJA INNOVATIVE INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Present: Mr.Dheeraj Gupta, Mr.Sanam, Siddiqui and Ms.Diksha Arora, Advs. for the petitioner. Mr.Ankur Bansal, Adv. alongwith Director of the respondent company in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The Petition is filed under Section 433(e), 434(1) and 439(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent company. The case of the... Petitioner is that the respondent company was developing a very prestigious and high end commercial project by the name of Innovative Legend Heights at Sector 80 Gurgaon. On 19.10.2011 the petitioner agreed to purchase a unit measuring 1530 Sq. Feet per super...
Tag this Judgment!Devender Garg vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~40 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15. 02.2019 % + BAIL APPLN. 393/2019 DEVENDER GARG versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 394/2019 SATISH KUMAR GARG STATE versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Kunal Madan with Ms. Ritu Kumari, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Sukhbir Singh, PS Keshav Puram. ASI Karam Vir Singh, PS North Rohini. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.3466/2019 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 393/2019 Crl.M.A.3467/2019 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 394/2019 Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 393/2019 & BAIL APPLN. 394/2019 Page 1 of 3 BAIL APPLN. 393/2019 & BAIL APPLN. 394/2019 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory transit bail in FIR No.15/2019 under SectionsIPC, Police Station Khairtal Jila, Alwar, Rajasthan.2. Learned counsel...
Tag this Judgment!Priyaranjan Chauhan vs.gaurav Garg
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.126/2019 15th February, 2019 ..... Appellant * + % PRIYARANJAN CHAUHAN Through: Kunwar Arish Ali, Mr. S.M.Prasad and Mr. Kapil Garg, Advocates. Versus GAURAV GARG ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.6629/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.126/2019 & CM No.6628/2019 (stay) RFA No.126/2019 Page 1 of 11 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 29.11.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit which was filed by the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 8,60,000/- along with interest, for a lesser amount of Rs. 4,70,000/- along with interest at 12% per annum. The suit has been decreed on account of the amount decreed being the balance due ...
Tag this Judgment!Panchsheel Constructions Through: Its Attorney Balik Ram Gautam vs.dav ...
Court: Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 380/2018 Date of Decision :15. h February, 2019 PANCHSHEEL CONSTRUCTIONS THROUGH: ITS ATTORNEY BALIK RAM GAUTAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Devinder Chaudhary, Adv. versus DAVINDER PAL SINGH CHAUHAN & ANR. Through: Mr.Piyush Mishra, Adv. for ........ RESPONDENTS R-1. Mr.Naveen Kumar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Collaboration Agreement dated 30.04.2011 executed between the parties.2. Learned counsels for the respondents submit that there is no binding Arbitration Agreement between the parties contained in the Arb.P.380/2018 Page 1 Collaboration Agreement and therefore, the present petition is not maintainable.3. The alleged Arbitration Agreement rel...
Tag this Judgment!