Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Rajesh Kumar Dabas & Anr vs.rajpati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.912/2018 and C.M. No.46241/2018 (stay) + % RAJESH KUMAR DABAS & ANR versus 18th February, 2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate RAJPATI ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one appears for the respondent, although the respondent is served. The matter was passed over for the presence of the respondent but even after a pass-over no one appears for the respondent. It is noted that in fact respondent did not appear in the suit in the trial court, and was proceeded ex parte. RFA No.912/2018 Page 1 of 4 2. When notice was issued in this appeal on 02.11.2018, a limited notice was issued, and this order dated 02.11.2018 reads as under:-"C.M. No.46240/2018(exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Nos.46242/2018(for condonation of delay 46243/2018(for condonation of delay in re-fil...
Tag this Judgment!Nehru Homeopathic Medical College & Hospital vs.ministry of Ayurveda, ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13321/2018 & CM APPLs. 51792-93/2018 Date of decision:18. h February, 2019 NEHRU HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. % 1.2. versus MINISTRY OF AYURVEDA, YOGA & NATUROPATHY UNANI, SIDHA AND HOMEOPATHY (AYUSH) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Pawan Pathak, Adv. for R- 1/UOI Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. with Ms. Seema Dolo, Adv. for R- 2/University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition involves a very limited issue. The letter of permission, permitting the petitioner Medical College (which is a government medical college functioning since 1992) to start a new course of Homeopathic Materia Medica with three seats, was issued by the Ministry of AYUSH (Respondent No.1 herein) on 8th January, 2018. W.P.(C) 13321/2018 Page 1 of 5 3. Immediately ...
Tag this Judgment!Ras Frozen Foods Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.rahul Darbari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2496/2016 & CRL.M.A. 3584/2019 CRL.M.C. 2408/2017 & CRL.M.A. 2409/2019 CRL.M.C. 4115/2017 & CRL.M.A. 16497-16498/2017 CRL.M.A. 2261/2019 ARUN KUMAR KHOBRAGADE RAS FROZEN FOODS PVT LTD & ANR RAS FROZEN FOODS PVT LTD & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate versus RAHUL DARBARI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay B. Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of complaint of 26th September, 2015 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and summoning order of 29th September, 2015 relating to dishonor of cheque of 25 lacs is sought on merits, whereas in the above captioned third petition quashing of complaint of 11th December, 2015 relating to dishonor of cheque of 25 lacs and summoning order of 25th February, 2016 is also sought on merits. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above CRL.M.C...
Tag this Judgment!Bharti Sharma vs.the Managment of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocates. versus THE MANAGMENT OF RUKMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR Through: Dr. M. Y. Khan, Advocate for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Vice Principal Zone-7, District North, Directorate of Education. Mr. V. Balaji, Panel Counsel with Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Advocate for R-2. WITH + DINESH CHAND LPA2102018 & CM APPLs. 15103/2018 & 15104/2018 .... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus THE MANAGEMENT OF RUKMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. M. Y. Khan, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Vice Principal Zone-7, District North, Directorate of Education. LPA1992018 & connected matters Page 1 of 19 Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD wit...
Tag this Judgment!Trammo Ag vs.mmtc Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h February, 2019 + EX.P. 164/2015 and EX.APPL.(OS) 1229/2015 TRAMMO AG ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Omar Ahmad and Mr. Nirman, Advocates (M:98732. 4989). versus MMTC LIMITED ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Debal Kumar Banerji, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Suman Yadav and Mr. Ayush Dhawan, Advocates ( M:99100. 4138). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition seeks execution of award dated 25th November, 2014 passed under the aegis of Indian Council of Arbitration. The relevant portion of the said award is as under:-"63. Based on the foregoing, the Tribunal hereby makes issues and publishes this Final Award as follows: a. The Respondent shall pay the Claimant the sum of US$ 3,465,000 with interest thereon computed at the rate of 12% per annum from 4th of January 2012 up to the date of this Award. From the day after the date of this Award up to...
Tag this Judgment!Shivraj Gupta & Anr. Vs.the Registrar of Societies & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM (M) 119/2019 & CM APPL.3605/2019 Judgment reserved on :31. 01.2019 Date of decision :18. 02.2019 SHIVRAJ GUPTA & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate versus THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES & ORS ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Naushad Ahamad Khan, ASC with Md. Tauheed Arshi, Adv. for GNCTD. Ms. Diya Kapur, Ms. Sugandha Batra, Advs. For R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide the present petition has assailed the impugned order dated 24.12.2018 of the learned trial Court of the ADJ-01, Central, THC, New Delhi in M-499/2017 vide which an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC filed by the petitioners herein as the plaintiffs of the said suit seeking an amendment in the plaint to value the reliefs their prayer clause a to f which read to the effect: a. Pass a decree of declaration that the amendment to Clause 2 of the Rules and Regulations of the Defendant No.2 Soci...
Tag this Judgment!Crocs Inc Usa vs.relaxo Footwear Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Sukhdeep Singh & Anr. Vs.ved Prakash Chauhan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 432/2015 Date of Decision :18. h February, 2019 SUKHDEEP SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Gayatri Misra, Mr.Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advs. versus VED PRAKASH CHAUHAN Through: Md. Azharuddin, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 21.02.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Partnership Deed dated 01.06.1989 executed between the petitioner no.2 and the respondent.2. The bone of contention between the parties is in relation to possession of shop situated at property bearing No.2360A, OMP No.432/2015 Page 1 Main Patel Nagar, Shadi-Khampur, New Delhi-110008 (hereinafter referred to as the shop)....
Tag this Judgment!Krishnanand & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 919/2019 & Crl.M.A.3666/2019 KRISHNANAND & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.S. Sharma, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Tej Ram Mr. Manjeet Singh and Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.365/2014, under Sections 406/498A/34 of IPC, registered at police station Najafgarh, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 6th March, 2018 (Ex.PX) reached between the parties before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Dwarka, Delhi. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Tej Ram on the basis of identity proof produced by her. respondent No.2, present in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Punit Sikka & Anr vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 18, 2019 * + CRL.M.C. 5874/2018 PUNIT SIKKA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rahul Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.208/2016, under Section 304-A of IPC registered at police station Pandav Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 8th March, 2017 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent Nos.2 and 3, present in the Court are the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and they have been identified to be so by SI Rahul on the basis of identity proof produced by them. submit Respondent Nos.2 and 3, that aforesaid Mediated Settlement of 8th March, 2017 has been fully acted upon. They affirm the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »