Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 24 of about 750 results (0.011 seconds)Delhi Development Authority vs.r.k. Jain
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.313/2007 + % Delhi Development Authority 20th February, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Nazia Parveen, Advocate (Mobile No.9811016162). R.K. JAIN versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Advocate (Mobile No.9810179438). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Though effectively, and the later part of this judgment will show that there were really no disputes which remained for being decided in this appeal, however, in order to understand the position that in reality there are no disputes, narration of the facts of the case would be required so as to dispose of this Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by the RFA No.313/2007 Page 1 of 9 defendant in the suit challenging the impugned Judgment of the trial court dated 29.11.2006.2. The impugned Judgment dated...
Tag this Judgment!Tarun Gulati & Anr vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 960/2019 TARUN GULATI & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit K. Nagpal, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor with Inspector Kanhaiya Lal Yadav Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 3822/2018 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 3823/2019 (delay) There is delay of 12 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 960/2019 Quashing of FIR No.156/2013, under Sections 66/66C of Information Technology Act, 2000 registered at Police Station E.O.W., Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 3rd CRL.M.C. 960/2019 Page1 March, 2017 (Annexure P-3) and on the ground that misunderstanding, which led to registration of the FIR in questio...
Tag this Judgment!Dayanand Jha vs.state of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~O-20 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h February, 2019 + 1. TEST.CAS. 57/2010 DAYANAND JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.R.K. Raizada, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vivek Gupta, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain, Mr.Bhoop Singh, Advocates for respondents No.2 to 5 along with respondent No.3 in person. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking probate of the Will dated 19th May, 1997 of late Mahanand Jha. Late Mahanand Jha expired on 14th January, 2000. The petitioner is the younger brother of late Mahanand Jha. Late Mahanand Jha was survived by his widow (respondent No.2), two sons (respondents No.3 and4) and one daughter (respondent No.5).2. Late Mahanand Jha left behind a Will and an addendum both dated 19th May, 1997 (Ex.PWand Ex.PW1/3) according to which the deceased bequeathed flat bearing No.3265, Ground Floor, Pocket 3, Sector D, DDA SFS Flats, Vasan...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 205/2019 Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2019 RAJ KUMAR versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP with Insp.Vijender Rana, Mr.Ajit Kumar and Ms.Nikita Sharma, Advocates. P.S.DIU/South East, ACP Jagdish Parshad, Supreme Court Security. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.3827/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.REV.P. 205/2019 & Crl.M.A.3825-3826/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 17.07.2018 whereby charge has been framed against the petitioner for the offence under Sections u/s 395/452/323/342/149/120B IPC. CRL.REV.P.205/2019 Page 1 of 5 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he restricts the challenges to the framing of charge under Section 395 IPC and in so far as other sections are concerned he shall...
Tag this Judgment!d.b Corp Ltd. Vs.d.p. Agrawal Publications Pvt. Ltd. & Others
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h February, 2019 + CS (COMM) 1320/2016 D.B CORP LTD. Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus (M:9899218215) D.P. AGRAWAL PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. & OTHERS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. ..... Defendants Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.As. 20753/2014 & I.A. 11547/2014 1. None appears for the Defendants. I.As. are dismissed. CS (COMM) 1320/2016, I.As. 11235/2014 & 17175/2014 2. The present suit has been filed by D.B Corp Ltd. (hereinafter the Plaintiff) seeking permanent injunction and damages. The case of the Plaintiff is that it is one of Indias largest print media companies and is engaged in the publication of 8 newspapers, which have 67 editions and 199 sub-editions in 4 different languages i.e. Hindi, Gujarati, Marathi and English. Newspapers of the Plaintiff are distributed in 14 states in India. The Plaintiff company is also involved in the running of FM Radio and internet service...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjeev Bhatia vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 945/2019 & Crl.M.As.3775-76/2019 SANJEEV BHATIA versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate with Mr. V. Madhukar and Ms. Bhabna Das, Advocates .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Banay Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Quashing of FIR No.203/2018 under Sections 354/354A/506 of IPC registered at P.S. Kirti Nagar, Delhi is sought on merits. It is stated that in the charge-sheet filed, offence under Sections 376 of IPC has been also added.2. Learned senior counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has a good case on merits and seeks quashing of the FIR in question while relying upon Supreme Courts decision in Vineet Kumar & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr., (2017) 13 SCC369 Learned senior counsel for petitioner submits that on a plain reading of the charge-sheet, no offe...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs.bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 243/2015 Date of Decision :20. h February, 2019 M/S DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Prasenjit Keswani, Mr.Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Advs. versus BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.S.Ray, Mr.Vaibhav Gulia, Advs. for BPCL Mr.Kirti Mewar, Mr.Alkanshree Dahar, Advs. for Indian Oil Corporation. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 01.12.2014 adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the following Agreement(s): Sl. No.1.2.3. Date 01.02.2007 15-18.06.2007 29.06.2007 Territory Delhi State of Haryana State of Rajasthan O.M.P. 243/2015 Page 1 4.5. 29.06.2007 11.10.2010 State of Punjab State of Uttar Pradesh 2. The primary dispute between the p...
Tag this Judgment!Neeraj Kumar Ranjan and Ors. Vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.7421/2015 & CM Appl.Nos. 31685/2016 & 5824/2019 Reserved on:6. h February, 2019 Decided on:19. h February, 2019 Through: Ms. Aakansha Kaul, Advocate. ........ Petitioners NEERAJ KUMAR RANJAN AND ORS. UOI AND ORS. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Senior panel counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA with Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 Aggrieved by a gradation list of Assistant Commandants (ACs) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) as on 1st January 2015, eleven... Petitioners have filed the present petition for quashing the said gradation list in so far as it relates to them and for a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to grant them seniority in the rank of AC as per their original seniority in the gradation list of Inspectors as on 1st January, 2007.2. Each of these... Petitioners joined the CRPF as Sub-Inspector (General Duty) (SI) (GD) on 1st March, 2003. They we...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Transport Corporation vs.shri Satnarain
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 2405/2017 & C.M. No.10359/2017 (for stay) & CM No.23221/2017 (u/S340C.P.C.) DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus SHRI SATNARAIN ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ashwani Tyagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present writ petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 3rd January, 2017 passed by the learned Labour Court in LCA No.923/16, directing the petitioner/DTC to pay a sum of Rs.10,34,568/- to the respondent/claimant within a month on account of wages from 6th September, 2010 to 12th December, 2014, along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said amount from 5th October, 2016.2. The necessary facts as emerge from the record are that the respondent who was working as a Conductor in the DTC, was issued a charge-sheet on 12th May, 1995 alleging that on 30.04.1995, he had failed to deposit the wage b...
Tag this Judgment!Muskan Goel and Ors. Vs.the Principal Aryabhatta College & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~20, 46, 48 and 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8779/2018 & CM APPL. 33767/2018 W.P.(C) 8782/2018 & CM APPL. 33772/2018 W.P.(C) 12796/2018 & CM APPLs. 49667-49668/2018 W.P.(C) 9205/2018 & CM APPL. 8067/2019 MOHIT WADHWA AND ORS. MUSKAN GOEL AND ORS. MANIK GUPTA AND ORS. ADITYA KHURANA AND ANR .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Adv. with Ms. Sushila and Mr. M.P.Singh, Adv. Mr. Yashu Khurana, Adv. THE PRINCIPAL ARYABHATTA COLLEGE & ANR versus .... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. with Mr. Akash Yadav, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv. for University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % W.P.(C) 8779/2018, W.P.(C) 12796/2018 & W.P.(C) 9205/2018 1. The petitioners in these cases are students pursuing various courses in the Aryabhatta College (Respondent No.1 herein and W.P.(C) 8779/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 referred to, he...
Tag this Judgment!