Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 23 of about 750 results (0.019 seconds)Sitab Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.A.No.957/2017, Crl. M.(Bail) 444/2017 & Crl. M.A. No.4688/2018 Judgment reserved on :26. 4.2018 Date of decision :20. 02.2019 SITAB SINGH STATE Through: Mr.Ankur Sood and Ms.Romila .....Appellant Mandal, Advocates with Appellant in JC. versus Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for ........ RESPONDENTS State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant Sitab Singh S/o Chander Singh convicted vide judgment dated 6.5.2017 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, Patiala House Courts, under Section 11(ii) of the Prevention of Child from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 punishable under Section 12 thereof and sentenced vide order on sentence dated 10.7.2017 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month with the benefit of Section 428 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, s...
Tag this Judgment!Raminder Ahluwalia vs.sandeep Walia & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 106/2019 RAMINDER AHLUWALIA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. versus SANDEEP WALIA & ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2002.2019 IA No.2632 & 2633/2019 (for exemptions) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are allowed. CS(OS) 106/2019 & IA No.2631/2019(u/O.XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 3. The plaintiff has sued the wife and son of the brother of the plaintiff for partition of property no.11/11, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi claiming that the plaintiff has a two-third share therein and the two defendants together have the remaining one-third share therein.4. According to the plaintiff, the property aforesaid belonged to the father of the plaintiff who died leaving a validly executed last Will bequeathing the property for lifetime to his wife and after the demise of his wife to his three sons including the plaintiff, in separate divisible portions as d...
Tag this Judgment!Biri Singh vs.d.t.c
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"20.02.2019 + W.P.(C) 559/2007 BIRI SINGH Through Mr.P.C.Misra, Adv. ........ Petitioner D.T.C. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI versus Through Ms.Bhakti Pasrija Sethi, Adv. ..... Respondent REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/workman impugns the Award dated 14.09.2006 passed by the learned Labour Court in I.D.No.427/06/96, whereunder his claim of having been illegally terminated from his services, has been rejected.2. At the outset, the facts emerging from the record that are deemed essential for the adjudication of the petition may be noted.3. The petitioner/workman having been appointed as a Conductor with the respondent/DTC in 1983, was issued a charge-sheet on 06.05.1991 alleging that on 19/20.04.1991, when he was on duty in Bus No.9065, his bus was inspected by the Checking Team at Safdarjung Airport and it was found that he ...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Kumar Lal & Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 949/2019 & Crl.M.A.3783/2019 DINESH KUMAR LAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.V.P. Katiyar, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with Naib Court/ASI Praveen Kumar Mr. Sunny, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.141/2016, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 7th August, 2018 (Annexure B) reached between the parties. respondent No.2, present Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- is the State submits that complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Praveen Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. in the Court, Respondent No.2, present in the Court,...
Tag this Judgment!Rekha Kaushal vs.punjab National Bank and Ors
Court: Delhi
+ W.P.(C) 8190/2017 REKHA KAUSHAL Reserved on:31. 01.2019 Pronounced on:20. 02.2019 ........ Petitioner $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.Rachit Batra, Adv. with Mr.Nimish Chandra & Mr.Sharad Arya, Advs. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS Through Adv.(appearance not given) ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction to set aside order dated 04.11.2016 passed by reviewing authority and petitioner be absolve of all the charges which have been levelled against her vide chargesheet dated 16.12.2013 and supplementary chargesheet dated 09.07.2014. She further seeks direction thereby directing the respondents to promote her to Senior Management Grade Scale-IV, with effect from the date from which her immediate junior has been promoted in the selection process held in the year 2014 in which the petitioner was also interviewed, W.P.(C) 8190/2017 Page 1 of 11 along with arrears of pay...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Bawa & Anr vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h February, 2019. TEST.CAS. 50/2016 ASHOK KUMAR BAWA & ANR Through: Mr. Abhinav Dhingra, Adv. ........ Petitioners Versus ........ RESPONDENTS STATE & ORS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Probate is sought by the two petitioners viz. Ashok Kumar and Naresh Mohan Bawa of the document dated 25th January, 2012 claimed to be the validly executed last Will of Late Sh. Sunil Kumar Bawa, son of Late Sh. Charanjit Lal Bawa who died at Dehradun on 10th October, 2015 leaving an immovable property No.101, Navjiwan Vihar, New Delhi.2. The petition came up first before this Court on 12th July, 2016 when finding the pleadings in the petition to be inadequate, the petitioners were directed to file an affidavit disclosing the particulars as detailed in the said order. Though the petitioners filed an affidavit but the same on 22nd August, 2016 was found to be inadequate and another opportunity granted. The p...
Tag this Judgment!R R D vs.r S
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:20. h February, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 201/2018 R R D CORAM: R S Through: Mr.Mitthan Lal, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through: Ms.Prerna, Advocate ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.33050/2018 (delay of 72 days in re-filing) 1. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 72 days delay in re-filing. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 72 days in re 3. filing is condoned. The application stands disposed of. C.M. No.33048/2018 (delay of 55 days in filing) 4. This an application filed by the appellant/wife seeking condonation of 55 days delay in filing the present appeal. In view of the judgment rendered by the Full bench of High Court of Bombay in the case of Shivram Dodanna Shetty vs. Sou. Sharmila Shivram Shetty reported at 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 9844, passed on 01.12.2016, the period o...
Tag this Judgment!Praveen Singh Negi & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 957/2019 PRAVEEN SINGH NEGI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Bijender Mr. A.K.Dubey, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 957/2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 3808/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 957/2019 Quashing of FIR No.189/2012, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Swaroop Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 26th November, 2018 of respondent No.2 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Bijender on the basis of identity proof produced by her. respondent No.2, present in the Court, Page1 R...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Pondicherry Tindivanam Tol ...
Court: Delhi
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) No.79/2019 & I.A. Nos. 2688/2019 & 2689/2019 Date of decision:20. h February, 2019 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Nanda Kumar with Ms. Tanu Priya Gupta, Mr. M.S. Saran Kumar and Ms. Deepika Nandu Kumar, Advocates versus M/S PONDICHERRY TINDIVANAM TOLLWAY LTD. Through: Ms. Priya Kumar with Mr. Tejas ..... Respondent Chhabra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): I.A. No.2687/2019 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CAV166167/2019 2. Since counsel for the respondent has entered appearance, the caveats are discharged. OMP (COMM) No.79/2019 Page 1 of 7 O.M.P. (COMM) 79/2019 & I.A. Nos. 2688/2019 & 2689/2019 3. This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act).4. Via this petition, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) seeks to challenge an interim award dated 16.10...
Tag this Judgment!Vipin Kumar vs.hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. 01.2019 Pronounced on:20. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 6862/2018 VIPIN KUMAR Through: Mr. Alakh Alok Srivastava and ........ Petitioner Mr.Chandan Kumar Singh, Advs. versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raj Birbal, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Raavi Birbal and Mr. Zahid Saifi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondents to set aside and quash the order dated 21.05.2018 passed by the respondents vide which the representation of the petitioner has been arbitrarily dismissed. He further seeks direction thereby to set aside and quash the downgraded ACR rating of 4 given by the respondents to the petitioner for the year 2014-15. Consequently, directing the respondents to promote the petitioner from the salary grade D to the salary grade E with W.P.(C) 6862/2018 Page 1 of 25 retrospective effect, u...
Tag this Judgment!