Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 30 of about 750 results (0.021 seconds)Crocs Inc Usa vs.bioworld Merchandising India Limited
Court: Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Vinit Handa @ Shankar & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & An ...
Court: Delhi
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18.02.2019 CRL.M.C. 3544/2018 VINIT HANDA @ SHANKAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR......... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Bajaj and Ms. Sagrika Wadhwa, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Rajeshwar, PS Shahdara Respondent No.2 in person CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.415/2014, under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Shahdara, Delhi based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have resolved their disputes and terms of settlement were recorded in an application filed on behalf of petitioner No.1 before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate.4. As per the terms ...
Tag this Judgment!Vikalp Welfare Society & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019 % + LPA1152019, CM Nos. 7641-7643/2019 VIKALP WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms. Nisha Sharma & Mr. Sambit Nanda, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI/R-1 & R-3 with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj & Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advs. Mr. Hashmat Nabi, ASC with Mr. Farah Naaz, Adv. for R-2 Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC (DUSIB) with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan & Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.7641/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM No.7643/2019 (for taking additional documents on record) For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Additional documents are taken on record. Application stands disposed of. LPA1152019 Page 1 of 10 LPA1152019 1. The challenge in the appea...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sh. Vahid Khan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. hFebruary, 2019 + MAC.APP. 472/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ...Appellant Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate. versus 1. SH. VAHID KHAN2 JAITUN W/o Sh.Vahid Khan, 3. ALAM S/o Sh. Vahid Khan 4. AMIR S/o Sh. Vahid Khan, 5. NADEEM S/o Sh. Vahid Khan, 6. RUKSANA D/o Sh. Vahid Khan, 7. JAINA D/o Sh. Vahid Khan, All R/o E-43/A-57, D-Block, New Seemapuri, Delhi-110095.8. DAYANAND SINGH (DRIVER) S/o Sh. Bhim Singh, R/o Shergarh Chhata, Mathura, UP.9. VIJAY KUMAR JAIN (OWNER) S/o Sh. M.P. Jain R/o V.P.O Dundahera, Distt. Gurgaon. ...... RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. 472/2015 Through: Mr. Rana Advocate. Kunal, Page 1 of 12 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The instant appeal is arising from the impugned award dated 31.03.2015 in MACT Case No.2passed by Ms. Kiran Bansal Presiding Officer, MACT North East District, Kakardooma Courts, New Delhi (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) whereby Respondent ...
Tag this Judgment!Kuldeep Maurya vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 900/2019 KULDEEP MAURYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Singh & Mr. Lokesh, Advocates STATE & ANR. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with ASI Ombir Mr. Jayant Kaushal, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person + CRL.M.C. 910/2019 VIPIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Kaushal, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with ASI Ombir Mr. Sunil Singh & Mr. Lokesh, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.C. 900/2019 & Crl.M.C. 910/2019 Page 1 of 5 In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.605/2015, whereas in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.604/ 2015, both under Sections 354A/323 of IPC, registered at police station Dabri, Delhi is sough...
Tag this Judgment!Crocs Inc. Usa vs.aqualite India Limited and Anr
Court: Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!D S P P vs.r & A.
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:18. h February, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 26/2017 D S P P Through: Mr. Ranjan Kumar and Mr. Shyam ..... Appellant R & A. CORAM: Prakash, Advocates versus Through: Mr. A.K. Pandey, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL72192018(restoration) 1. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking restoration of the appeal which was dismissed on the ground of non 3. prosecution on 19.09.2017. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the order dated 19.09.2017 is recalled. The appeal is restored to its original number and file.4. The application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 26/2017 5. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 14.09.2016 passed by the Family Court on an application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as MAT.APP.(F.C.) 26/2017 Page 1 of 4...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Chand vs.the Management of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocates. versus THE MANAGMENT OF RUKMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR Through: Dr. M. Y. Khan, Advocate for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Vice Principal Zone-7, District North, Directorate of Education. Mr. V. Balaji, Panel Counsel with Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Advocate for R-2. WITH + DINESH CHAND LPA2102018 & CM APPLs. 15103/2018 & 15104/2018 .... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus THE MANAGEMENT OF RUKMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. M. Y. Khan, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Vice Principal Zone-7, District North, Directorate of Education. LPA1992018 & connected matters Page 1 of 19 Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD wit...
Tag this Judgment!Ashish Davey vs.manjula
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.137/2019 + % ASHISH DAVEY18h February, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocate (M. No.9891656411) & Mrs. Kirti Kapoor, Advocate (M. No.9953277266). MANJULA versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.7345/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.137/2019 and C.M. No.7344/2019(stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 12.10.2018 by which RFA No.137/2019 Page 1 of 6 the trial court has decreed the suit for partition filed by the respondent/plaintiff/sister with respect to the property of the father being Flat No.373-F, Pocket-II, Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi. By the impugned judgment, a preliminary decree for partition has been pa...
Tag this Judgment!Sajan Sethi vs.rajan Sethi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SAJAN SETHI RAJAN SETHI RFA No.641/2018 18th February, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Amita Gupta and Ms. Kinjal Shrivastava, Advocates (8149285043) versus Through: Mr. Samrat Nigam, Advocate (9810424476) ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 20.04.2018 by which the trial court has passed a final decree for partition with respect to the property bearing No.D-1090, New Friends Colony, New Delhi (hereinafter suit property) situated on a plot of 292 sq. yards. There is already a preliminary decree passed between the parties on RFA No.641/2018 Page 1 of 14 06.03.2017 declaring the shares/rights of the parties in the suit property, and the same has become final.2. The facts of the case...
Tag this Judgment!