Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 31 of about 750 results (0.020 seconds)Hetero Healthcare Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 10220/2018 & CM Appln. No.39861/2018 HETERO HEALTHCARE LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 12107/2018 & CM Appln. Nos.46974/2018 BIOSTRASS THERAPEUTICS INC. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bina Gupta, Ms. Priya Singh, Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Mr. Avinash Tripathi and Binay Kumar. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms Maninder Acharya, ASG Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Abhimanyu Singh, Mr Abhigyan Sidhant and Mr Viplav Acharya. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petitions impugning a notification (No.S.O. 4429(E)) issued by respondent No.1 dated 07.09.2018 (hereafter the impugned notification), proscribing the W.P.(C) 10220 of 2018 and connected matter Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Arun Kumar Khobragade vs.rahul Darbari
Court: Delhi
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2496/2016 & CRL.M.A. 3584/2019 CRL.M.C. 2408/2017 & CRL.M.A. 2409/2019 CRL.M.C. 4115/2017 & CRL.M.A. 16497-16498/2017 CRL.M.A. 2261/2019 ARUN KUMAR KHOBRAGADE RAS FROZEN FOODS PVT LTD & ANR RAS FROZEN FOODS PVT LTD & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate versus RAHUL DARBARI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay B. Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of complaint of 26th September, 2015 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and summoning order of 29th September, 2015 relating to dishonor of cheque of 25 lacs is sought on merits, whereas in the above captioned third petition quashing of complaint of 11th December, 2015 relating to dishonor of cheque of 25 lacs and summoning order of 25th February, 2016 is also sought on merits. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above CRL.M.C...
Tag this Judgment!Chhavi Poplai & Anr vs.rajesh Chugh & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 35/2019 & CM APPL. 7351/2019 (stay) ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ashish Deep Verma, Advocate. CHHAVI POPLAI & ANR RAJESH CHUGH & ANR versus Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER1802.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 23rd January 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge declining to vacate the interim injunction passed on 31st August 2018 in IA No.11667 of 2018 in CS (Comm) 1095 of 2018 and CS (Comm) 48 of 2018. As a result the learned Single Judge dismissed IA No.12286 of 2018 filed by the present Appellants (Defendants in the suit) under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC for vacating the said interim injunction.2. The background facts are set out in the order dated 31st August 2018 which reads as under: It is stated that the father of the plaintiffs, late Mr. Amir Chand initially adopted the trademark 'Nizam's, as Karta of the HUF and...
Tag this Judgment!Sachin Sachdeva & Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Kr. Saini, Advocate Versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Narasi Prasad Ms. Archana Mishra, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 18, 2019 * + CRL.M.C. 5126/2018 SACHIN SACHDEVA & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.33/2017, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC registered at police station Nizamuddin, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 27th March, 2018 reached between the parties. respondent No.2, present Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Narasi Prasad on the basis of identity proof produced by her. in the Court Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties ha...
Tag this Judgment!Biostrass Therapeutics Inc. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 10220/2018 & CM Appln. No.39861/2018 HETERO HEALTHCARE LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 12107/2018 & CM Appln. Nos.46974/2018 BIOSTRASS THERAPEUTICS INC. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bina Gupta, Ms. Priya Singh, Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Mr. Avinash Tripathi and Binay Kumar. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms Maninder Acharya, ASG Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Abhimanyu Singh, Mr Abhigyan Sidhant and Mr Viplav Acharya. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petitions impugning a notification (No.S.O. 4429(E)) issued by respondent No.1 dated 07.09.2018 (hereafter the impugned notification), proscribing the W.P.(C) 10220 of 2018 and connected matter Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Crocs Inc Usa vs.bata India Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Ras Frozen Foods Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.rahul Darbari
Court: Delhi
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2496/2016 & CRL.M.A. 3584/2019 CRL.M.C. 2408/2017 & CRL.M.A. 2409/2019 CRL.M.C. 4115/2017 & CRL.M.A. 16497-16498/2017 CRL.M.A. 2261/2019 ARUN KUMAR KHOBRAGADE RAS FROZEN FOODS PVT LTD & ANR RAS FROZEN FOODS PVT LTD & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate versus RAHUL DARBARI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay B. Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of complaint of 26th September, 2015 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and summoning order of 29th September, 2015 relating to dishonor of cheque of 25 lacs is sought on merits, whereas in the above captioned third petition quashing of complaint of 11th December, 2015 relating to dishonor of cheque of 25 lacs and summoning order of 25th February, 2016 is also sought on merits. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above CRL.M.C...
Tag this Judgment!Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-6, New Delhi vs.ntpc Sail Power Co. Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h February, 2019 + ITA12902018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-6, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Asheesh Jain, Sr.Std.Counsel with Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate versus NTPC SAIL POWER CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.M.P.Rastogi, Mr.K.N.Ahuja & Mr.Manu K.Giri, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"]. is directed against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal"]., dated 24.07.2018, passed in ITA No.6501/DEL/2014, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. In the present appeal, notice has been issued only on one question - pertaining to the disallowance of additional depreciation claimed by the respondent/assessee for Assessment Year 2011- 2012.2. The assessee is a joint venture company of tw...
Tag this Judgment!Fugro Survey (India) Private Limited vs.engineers India Limited and An ...
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision :18. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 155/2019, CM Nos.802-03/2019 & 5795/2019 FUGRO SURVEY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ...... Petitioner Through : Mr. Aniruddha Joshi, Mr. Rajeev K. Panday, Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advs. versus ENGINEERS INDIA LIMITED AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Anil Kaushik, Mr. Abhishek Mishra and Mr. Akash Bhardwaj, Advs. for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner had furnished its bid, pursuant to a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) issued by the Engineers India Limited (hereafter as EIL i.e. the first respondent), who are nominated as Project Consultant and Implementing Agency, on behalf of the HPCL Rajasthan Refineries Limited (hereafter the second respondent) which proposed to set up an oil refinery in Barmer. The scope of the work included marine geophysical surv...
Tag this Judgment!Sadhna Payal vs.the Management of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocates. versus THE MANAGMENT OF RUKMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR Through: Dr. M. Y. Khan, Advocate for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Vice Principal Zone-7, District North, Directorate of Education. Mr. V. Balaji, Panel Counsel with Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Advocate for R-2. WITH + DINESH CHAND LPA2102018 & CM APPLs. 15103/2018 & 15104/2018 .... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus THE MANAGEMENT OF RUKMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. M. Y. Khan, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Vice Principal Zone-7, District North, Directorate of Education. LPA1992018 & connected matters Page 1 of 19 Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD wit...
Tag this Judgment!