Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 1 of about 750 results (0.011 seconds)C D Nagsrajan & Ors vs.the Election Commission of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI08h February, 2019 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on 28th February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10725/2017 V K SASIKALA Through : Dr.A.M.Singhvi, ... Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr.Vivek Singh, Mr.N. Raja Senthoor Pandian, Ms. Mary Mitzy, Ms.Shakun Sharma, Ms.Harshal Gupta and Ms.Devyani Gupta, Advocates versus THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for respondent Kohli, Ms.Garima Sengupta, no.1/ECI Mr.C.S. Vaidyanathan, Mr.K.V. Viswanathan and Mr.Guru Krishna Kumar, Senior Advocates with Mr.Balaji Srinivasan, Mr.Siddhant Jain, Ms.Pallavi Ms.Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Ms.Lakshmi Rao, Mr.Anirudh Gupta, Mr.Harsh Vaidyanathan Shankar, Mr.Ram Shankar, Ms.Pratiksha Mishra, Mr.Ravi Raghunath, Ms.Srishti Govil, Mr.Arunava Mr.Mayank Kshirsagar, Mr.Babu Murugavel, Mr.Prakash Kumar Gandhi and Mr.R.Rakesh Sharma, Advocates for respondents no.2 to 4. Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate...
Tag this Judgment!Steel Authority of India Ltd vs.m/s Seaspray Shipping Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 76/2015 & I.A. No.13588/2017 Reserved on:20. 12.2018 Date of decision :28. 02.2019 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sunil K. Jain, Mr.Madhur Jain, Mr.Abhishek Jain, Ms.Anusha Agarwal and Mr.Yuvraj Sharma, Advs. versus M/S SEASPRAY SHIPPING CO LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Mr.Dhruv Kapur,Ms.Deepali Dwivedi, Mr.Aliff Fazelboy and Mr.Adit Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 20.08.2014 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement dated 04.12.2007 executed between the parties.2. In the order dated 22.02.2017 passed by this Court, it was observed that the Arbitral Tribunal has not given reasons for its conclusion...
Tag this Judgment!Mahender Singh & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1170/2019 MAHENDER SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. Ranvir Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Rahul Kumar Mr. M.D.Farman, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.315/2018, under Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 13th December, 2018 (Annexure- P-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Rahul Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits...
Tag this Judgment!Ashwani Seth vs.insurance Regulatroy and Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6046/2017 ASHWANI SETH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S.K. Ray, Mr S.P. Sausan, Mr Amitara Poddar and Ms Nikita Chaturvedi, Advocates. Versus INSURANCE REGULATROY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Dipak K. Nag and Mr Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2802.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondents, to renew his licence as Surveyor and Loss Assessor. It is stated that the petitioner has been working as a Surveyor and Loss Assessor on behalf of several insurance companies, since the past twenty years. He has filed the present petition being aggrieved on account of non-renewal of his licence, which had expired on 21.07.2012.2. The petitioner was awarded a Diploma from the Insurance Institute of India, Bombay on 12.05.1992. He was, thereafter, empanelled as a Surveyor and Loss...
Tag this Judgment!V K Sasikala vs.the Election Commission of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI08h February, 2019 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on 28th February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10725/2017 V K SASIKALA Through : Dr.A.M.Singhvi, ... Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr.Vivek Singh, Mr.N. Raja Senthoor Pandian, Ms. Mary Mitzy, Ms.Shakun Sharma, Ms.Harshal Gupta and Ms.Devyani Gupta, Advocates versus THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for respondent Kohli, Ms.Garima Sengupta, no.1/ECI Mr.C.S. Vaidyanathan, Mr.K.V. Viswanathan and Mr.Guru Krishna Kumar, Senior Advocates with Mr.Balaji Srinivasan, Mr.Siddhant Jain, Ms.Pallavi Ms.Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Ms.Lakshmi Rao, Mr.Anirudh Gupta, Mr.Harsh Vaidyanathan Shankar, Mr.Ram Shankar, Ms.Pratiksha Mishra, Mr.Ravi Raghunath, Ms.Srishti Govil, Mr.Arunava Mr.Mayank Kshirsagar, Mr.Babu Murugavel, Mr.Prakash Kumar Gandhi and Mr.R.Rakesh Sharma, Advocates for respondents no.2 to 4. Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate...
Tag this Judgment!Air Marshal Harish Masand vs.m/s Outlook Publishing (India)
Court: Delhi
$~9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h February, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3838/2016 and Crl. M.A. 16071/2016 AIR MARSHAL HARISH MASAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Walia Kathiala, Advocates Samrat Nigam, Mr. and Mr. Shaurya versus M/S OUTLOOK PUBLISHING (INDIA) PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the complainant in criminal complaint case (CC No.1168/1/2005) which is pending in the court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) of South District at Saket, the first to third respondents (collectively referred to hereinafter as the accused) having been summoned as accused therein by order dated 23.01.2006, on the basis of preliminary inquiry, on the accusations of offences punishable under Sections 500, 501 and 502 of Indian Penal code, 1860 (IPC). Crl.MC38382016 Page 1 of 14 2. The trial in the aforesaid case had reached the stage of defence evidence ...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Transport Corporation vs.ram Kumar (Deceased) Thr Lr Babli Devi
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 8974/2017 & C.M. Nos.36728/2017, 36731/2017 Date of decision:28. 02.2019 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Ms.Aditi Gupta, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus RAM KUMAR (DECEASED) THR LR BABLI DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.G.S. Charya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/DTC impugns the order dated 11.01.2017 passed by the learned Labour Court in LCA No.09/16, directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.2,76,449/- to Smt.Babli Devi, the legal representative of the deceased respondent/workman, towards his wages for the period between 15.10.2009 and 28.07.2011.2. Before dealing with the rival contentions of the parties, it may be appropriate to note the undisputed facts emerging from the record. The respondent/workman having been appointed as a Driver in the petitioner/DTC on 29.09.1982, was terminated...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1181/2019 MUKESH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Nikhil Rastogi & Mr. Vinod Nagpal, Advocates Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Rajinder Pal Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.233/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Delhi Cantt., Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 15th February, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Rajinder Pal on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved and she...
Tag this Judgment!Symphony Ltd. Vs.life Plus Appliances
Court: Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h February, 2019 + CS (COMM) 324/2018 SYMPHONY LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, Advocate. versus (M:9818844415) LIFE PLUS APPLIANCES CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. ..... Defendant Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Symphony Ltd. (hereinafter, Plaintiff) has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of its registered designs and for damages. The Plaintiff is a company, which is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of consumer home appliances including air coolers. The three models of air coolers of the company, designs of which are registered, are as under: Design No.Model Date of Registration 235189 198241 227069 Symphony Storm 70i 14th March, 2011 Symphony Winter 20th January, 2005 Symphony Sumo 4th February, 2010 2. Copies of the registration certificates, along with the representation sheets for each of the models have been filed on record...
Tag this Judgment!S O vs.p O
Court: Delhi
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. 02.2019 S O * % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 53/2018 & CM APPL. 47888/2018 Through: Appellant in person. versus P O ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Prashant ..... Respondent Mendiratta and Mr.Aayush Agarwal, Advocates along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. In this appeal challenge is to the judgment and decree dated 06.02.2018 passed by the Family Court by which a decree of divorce has been granted in favour of the respondent/husband.2. The primary grievance of the appellant is that her right to cross- examine the respondent/husband was closed and thereafter, the matter was heard in her absence. Although, the learned counsel for the respondent/husband has drawn attention of this Court to the order sheets of the learned Family Court to show that the present matter pertains to the year 2009 and issues were framed on 03.07.2015. The respondent/husba...
Tag this Judgment!