Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr. Vs.seema Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 02.2019 $~ * + % W.P.(C) 1738/2019 and C.M. Nos.8084-8085/2019 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, St. Counsel, GNCTD (Services) with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Aarushi and Ms. Sakshi Shaipwal, Advs. versus SEEMA KAPOOR Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 05.09.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.3213/2017. W.P.(C.) No.1738/2019 Page 1 of 6 2. The Tribunal has allowed the said Original Application preferred by the respondent and held that she was entitled to grant of age relaxation of 5 years while offering her candidature for the post of PGT (English) Female. The petitioner has been directed ...
Dharmendra & Ors vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 939/2019 & Crl.M.A.3765/2019 DHARMENDRA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudeep Dey, Advocate versus THE STATE & ORS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with Inspector Hira Lal... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 5 in person + CRL.M.C. 954/2019 & Crl.M.A.3804/2019 SNEH KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.S. Juneja and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Rana, Advocates versus THE STATE OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with Inspector Hira Lal... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 5 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above-captioned two petitions relate to one incident and pertain to one FIR and so, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. In the above-captioned two petition...
Delhi Administration vs.arun Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2019 CRL.REV.P. 415/2015 DELHI ADMINISTRATION versus ARUN GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State Mr. C.M. Krishna, DLA Food Safety For the Respondent : Mr. Rahul Shyam Bhandari and Ms. Bhavya Vijay Tangri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner-State impugns order dated 07.12.2009 whereby the respondent has been discharged under Section 245 Cr. P.C. for the offence under Section 13(2) to (2D) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the act).2. The case of the prosecution is that sample of Khoya Burfi was lifted on 18.11.1997 and it was tested on 20.11.1997 in the laboratory at Delhi and presence of fungus was found in the sample. CRL.REV.P4152015 Page 1 of 5 3. The authorities again got the s...
Shushila Kumari & Anr. Vs.bhayana Builders Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:12. 11.2018 Judgment pronounced on:20. 02.2019 O.M.P.(T) 13/2017 + SHUSHILA KUMARI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Vivya Nagpal, Adv. versus BHAYANA BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satvik Varma with Ms. Meghna Misra, Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Mr. Nipun Gautam, Mr. Udit Chauhan, Ms. Avshreya Rudy and Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Prefatory facts 1. This is a petition filed under Section 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). The substantive prayers made in the petition are :-"(a) to appoint a Substitute Arbitrator in the matter (b) fix a consolidated amount payable towards Arbitrators fee. (c) In addition thereto, the usual residuary prayer has been made which is to pass any other order that may be deemed fit and appropriate in the instant case.2. The petitioners grievance, principally, emanates from...
Deepak Kapil vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 955/2019 & Crl.M.A.3805/2019 DEEPAK KAPIL Through: Mr.M.A.Niyazi, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Varun Mr. Chatanya Siddharth, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.95/2018, under Sections 420/4of IPC registered at Police Station Hauz Khas, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 13th February, 2019 and on the ground that the misunderstanding, which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. that respondent No.2, present Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by his counsel as well as by SI Varun on the basis of id...
Central Bank of India vs.s. Chandrashekhar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 02.2019 $~7 * + % LPA7692011 CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.S. Mathur, Adv. versus S. CHANDRASHEKHAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Hetu Arora, Mr. Siddharth Agarwal and Mr. Rahul Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant - Central Bank of India in short 'the Bank', is aggrieved of the order dated 10.08.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby, in WP(C) 3833/2006 filed by the respondent, the Bank, inter alia, was directed to grant pension to the respondent under its Pension Regulations, 1995.2. Concisely, the facts relevant to the appeal are that the respondent had joined the Bank as a Clerk on 03.08.1972 and earned promotions over a span of 22 years of his service to the Bank. It is a matter of record that in the year 1990, the Reserve Bank of India arrived at a settlement with its employees to extend them the pensionar...
Doris vs.denial & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.155/2019 20th February, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manendra Mishra and Mr. Vikrant Pratap Singh, Advocates (Mobile No.9818949469). versus ........ RESPONDENTS * + % DORIS DENIAL & ORS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.155/2019 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 8119-20/2019 1. This is a completely frivolous appeal by a dishonest plaintiff in the suit, who entered into a settlement agreement running into eight pages before the Mediation Centre in the trial court, with each page being signed by all the parties including the present appellant/plaintiff, and the trial court thus held that the settlement agreement is valid, and RFA No.155/2019 Page 1 of 3 it consequently disposed of the suit in terms of the settlement agreement by the impugned order dated 18.09.2018.2. Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC requires that a suit can be disposed of as per the settlement if the settlement ag...
Satish Ahuja vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2019 W.P.(C) 580/2015 + SATISH AHUJA Versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr Pranav Sachdeva and Mr Jatin Bhardwaj For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms Mrinalini Sen, Ms Nidhi Raman and Mr Tanmay Yadav for UOI. Ms Sonali Kumar for R-2/IOCL. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner was operating a retail outlet for petroleum products in Ghaziabad, which was shut down as the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) did not renew the lease on terms as acceptable to respondent No.2 (IOCL). The petitioner has filed the inter alia, praying that directions be issued to present petition, respondent No.2 (IOCL) to grant revival of the dealership or resitement of a retail outlet. Further, the petitioner prays that IOCL be directed to compensate the petitioner for the alleged losses suffered by him for maintaini...
Sri Krishan and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4919/2014, CM APPLs.9854/2014 & 6749/2019 SRI KRISHAN AND ORS. ...Petitioners Mr.Ravi Prakash Gupta, Advocate. Through: versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, for LAC/L&B. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel DDA with Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT2002.2019 1. The prayers in this writ petition read as under:"(i) Issue any appropriate writ, order or direction declaring acquisition proceedings w.r.t. land of petitioners measuring total 38-04 bighas comprised in Khasra Nos.9 to 13, 17 to 20 & 26 situated, at Village- Iradat Nagar @Naya Bans, North-West Delhi in N.C.T. of Delhi [mentioned at serial No.75 to 78 in the list of claimants given in Award bearing No.7/DC(NW)/2004-05 dt. 29.06.2004]. as deemed to have lapsed u/s Section 24 (2) of Land Acqu...
Sneh Kumar & Ors vs.the State of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 20, 2019 CRL.M.C. 939/2019 & Crl.M.A.3765/2019 DHARMENDRA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudeep Dey, Advocate versus THE STATE & ORS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with Inspector Hira Lal... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 5 in person + CRL.M.C. 954/2019 & Crl.M.A.3804/2019 SNEH KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.S. Juneja and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Rana, Advocates versus THE STATE OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with Inspector Hira Lal... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 5 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above-captioned two petitions relate to one incident and pertain to one FIR and so, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. In the above-captioned two petition...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »