Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Newfields Advertising (P) Ltd. Vs.banking Services Recruitment Boa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.392/2005 + % M/S NEWFIELDS ADVERTISING (P) LTD. 27th September, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. C.S.Bhandari, Advocate (8860346364) Through: versus BANKING SERVICES RECRUITMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 31.01.2005 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.5,46,193/-, out of which the principal amount claimed is Rs.4,55,193/- and the interest claimed is Rs.91,000/-. The suit RFA3922005 Page 1 of 9 amount however has been restricted to a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- instead of the amount out of the Rs.5,46,193/-, in order to bring the suit within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Judge.2. The appellant/pl...
Pawan Mehra vs.paras Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + % + PAWAN MEHRA RFA No.602/2006 RFA No.602/2006 RFA No.601/2006 CONT. CAS (C) 864/2012 27th September, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.K. Sharma, Advocate (Mobile No.9811283658). versus PARAS RAM Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar (Mobile Advocate 9899204289). ..... Respondent Singh, No.+ RFA No.601/2006 PAWAN MEHRA ..... Appellant BANWARI LAL Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Advocates Singh, Devik (Mobile No.8888556671). versus Through: Ms. Laxmi Singh, ..... Respondent proxy Advocate for Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate (Mobile Nos. 9654013250, 9899204289). RFA No.602 /2006, RFA No.601 /2006 & CONT. CAS (C) 864/2012 Page 1 of 11 + CONT. CAS (C) No.864/2012 SONAL MEHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.K. Sharma and Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocates (Mobile No.9811283658). BANWARI LAL AND ORS. versus Through: Ms. Laxmi Singh, ........ RESPONDENTS proxy Advocate for Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate (Mobile Nos. 9654013250, 9899204289). CORAM: HONBLE ...
M/S Chadha Brothers Thr Its Proprietor S K Chadha vs.nisha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 27, 2018 (i) + MAC.APP. 754/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates Versus NEERAJ & ORS. (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Respondents (ii) + MAC.APP. 756/2017 & CM302262017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant Versus SHIVRAJ & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate (iii) + MAC.APP. 762/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant MAC. APPs. 754/2017, 756/2017, 762/2017 & 764/2017 Page 1 of 6 Versus POONAM & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate (iv) + MAC.APP. 764/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant Versus NISHA & ORS. Through: Mr. J.P.N. S...
Jute Investment Company Limited vs.idbi Capital Market Services Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~85 & 86 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 212/2018 M/S THE RAMESHWARA JUTE MILLS LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajeev Virmani, Sr Adv with Mr Neeraj Chaudhari, Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Akash Sharma, Advs versus M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Adv with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Megha Gupta and Mr Sangram Singh, Advs for R-1 FAO(OS) (COMM) 213/2018 JUTE INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Adv with Mr Rishi Aggarwal and Ms Aarushi Tiku, Advs versus IDBI CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LIMITED & ORS.... Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Adv with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Megha Gupta and Mr Sangram Singh, Advs for R-4... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) FAO (OS) (Comm) 212/2018 & 213/2018 Page 1 of 6 1. The present appeals are directed against the order passed by the l...
Amritha Sankar vs.medical Council of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 9855/2018 PARUL BHATNAGAR Petitioner Through: Sh. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. T. Singhdev, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle Biathansangi Das, Sh. Tarun Verma and Sh. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates, for MCI. Sh. Sanjib Kumar Mohanty with Sh. Amit Acharya, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. + W.P.(C) 10077/2018, C.M. APPL.39300-39301/2018 AMRITHA SANKAR THROUGH : AR Petitioner Through: Sh. Viraj Kadam, Advocate. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ..Respondents Through: Sh. T. Singhdev, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Sh. Tarun Verma, Ms. Puja Sarkar and Ms. Michelle Biathansangi Das, Advocates, for MCI. Ms. Monika Arora with Sh. Vibhu Tripathi, CGSC and Sh. Harsh Ahuja, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. T...
Ramesh Chand vs.jamia Millia Islamia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h September, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8103/2017 RAMESH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani, Adv. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA Through : Mr. Wasim Qadri, Mr. Tamim Qadri and Mr. Saeed Qadri, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. This writ petition seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus, to the respondent, to release, to the petitioner, pension and gratuity to which, according to him, he is entitled under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972.2. The facts of the case may briefly be stated as under : (i) In 1990, the petitioner joined as Safai Karamchari with the respondentUniversity (hereinafter referred to as the University) on ad-hoc basis. He was, thereafter, appointed on a permanent basis in 1997 and was confirmed on the said post on 29th July, 1998. W.P.(C) 8103/2017 Page 1 of 7 (ii) Vide order dated 11thDecember, 2007, the petitioner was awarded th...
M/S Chadha Brothers Thr Its Proprietor S K Chadha vs.shivraj & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 27, 2018 (i) + MAC.APP. 754/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates Versus NEERAJ & ORS. (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Respondents (ii) + MAC.APP. 756/2017 & CM302262017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant Versus SHIVRAJ & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate (iii) + MAC.APP. 762/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant MAC. APPs. 754/2017, 756/2017, 762/2017 & 764/2017 Page 1 of 6 Versus POONAM & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate (iv) + MAC.APP. 764/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant Versus NISHA & ORS. Through: Mr. J.P.N. S...
Anil Shere vs.choyang Health Care India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~22 to 24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Decided on:27. h September, 2018 CRL.M.C. 4943/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33054/2018 ANIL SHERE Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD ... Respondent Through: None CRL.M.C. 4944/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33055/2018 ANIL SHERE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD .... Respondent Through: None CRL.M.C. 4945/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33056/2018 ANIL SHERE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Crl. M.C. No.4943-4945/2018 Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions arise out of proceedings relating to three different criminal complaint cases (CC635817, 63and 6357/17) which were brought before the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate by the respondent company each alleging offences punishable under ...
M/S Tara Chand Sumit Const. Co. Vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
#39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h September, 2018 W.P.(C) 2241/2018 M/S TARA CHAND SUMIT CONST. CO. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Ms. Stuti Jain and Mr. Akshu Jain, Advocates. : Ms. Kanika Singh and Mr. Sangram Singh, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner is aggrieved by the order No.92/2017 dated 13.9.2017 passed by the Contractors Registration Board, whereby, the petitioner, who is a contractor of the respondent, has been debarred from tendering further for tenders issued by the DDA for a period of three years from the date of issuance of the impugned order. The said order has been passed pursuant to a show cause notice dated 19.7.2017 issued to the petitioner, which reads as under : W.P. (C ) 2241/2018 Page 1 of 4 It has been intimated to this offic...
Kismat Singh vs.piariya Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h September, 2018 FAO2702011 KISMAT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.K. Diwan and Mr. Lalit Kumar, versus Advocates PIARIYA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The greatest challenge before the judiciary today is frivolous litigation. False claims are a huge strain on the judicial system. In Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India, (2014) 8 SCC470 the Supreme Court observed that the Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted with frivolous litigation and a mechanism needs to be evolved to deter litigants from their compulsive obsession towards senseless and ill-considered claims. Relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced hereunder: 191. The Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted, with frivolous litigation. Ways and means need to be evolved, to deter litigants from their compulsive obsession, towards senseless and ill-con...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »