Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gaya Prasad Yadav vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2018
#69 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:04. 09.2018 W.P.(C) 9254/2018 GAYA PRASAD YADAV versus ........ Petitioner EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner :Mr.PrashantSharma,AdvocatewithMr.AmitKr. Verma,Advocate. :Mr.G.D.Mishra,StandingCounsel. For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follow:-"against a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the respondent i.e. Plot No.198, Khasra No.15/18, Pole No.0 Main Sevadham Road, Mandoli, the W.P.(C) 9254/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Delhi-110093; Any other relief may also be granted by the Honble Co...
Mukul Trivedi vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2018
$~54 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: September 04, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 496/2016 MUKUL TRIVEDI ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Francis, Advocate with petitioner in person versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (CC no.543/2012 new no.26132/2008) of the respondent (complainant), the Metropolitan Magistrate, by his order dated 30.08.2013, declined to issue any process and dismissed the case under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC). The said order was challenged before the court of sessions invoking its revisional jurisdiction (criminal revision no.120/2013) which was allowed by order dated 26.02.2014 holding, inter alia, that a prima facie case of dishonest intention had been made out and the complaint merited being proceeded with further. Against this backdrop, the Metropolitan Magistrate issued summons to the petition...
Union of India vs.vijay Singh Chauhan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 4th September, 2018 LA.APP. 321/2007 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Shashi Kant Maurya, Mr. M.S. Akhtar and Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advs. VIJAY SINGH CHAUHAN & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak K. Thakur, Adv. for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 impugns the judgment and decree dated 20th December, 2006 in LAC No.337/1/2006 (Old LAC No.201/03) of the Court of Additional District Judge (LAC) on a reference under Section 18 of the Act.2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 2nd November, 2007, when notice thereof was ordered to be issued and till further orders, the disbursement of additional amount in terms of Section 23(1A) of the Act for the period from 11th April, 1983 to 14th December, 1995 was stayed. The appeal was admitt...
Shafique Khan vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2018
$~R-5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + 1. Date of decision:1. t September, 2018 CRL.A. 340/2016 SHAFIQUE KHAN ..... Appellant Through : Mr. B.S. Chowdhary and Ms. Sneh Lata Rana, Advs. versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State SI Anup Rana from PS Uttam Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the appeals filed by co-accused, co-accused Sita Ram and Akhilesh in this case, the following order was passed by this court on 7th June, 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of order: June 07, 2017 +CRL.A. 244/2016 SITA RAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Dinesh Malik, DHCLSC Panel Counsel +CRL.A. 268/2016 Crl.A. 340/2016 Page 1 of 5 AKHILESH STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel Versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Ra...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›