Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gurdev Singh vs.ramshray Yadav & Ors (M/S Reliance General Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 27, 2018 + MAC.APP. 33/2018 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate Versus + MAC.APP. 311/2018 GURDEV SINGH & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. R.K.Nain, Advocate GURDEV SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K.Nain, Advocate Versus RAMSHRAY YADAV & ORS (M/s RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO ) .....Respondents Through: Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 24th November, 2017 grants compensation of `12,72,000/- with interest @9% per annum to Gurdev Singh (hereinafter referred to as the Injured), aged 37 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 13th August, 2009.2. In the above captioned first appeal, M/s Reliance General Insurance Company (henceforth referred to as the Insurer) seeks reduction in the quantum of compensation awarded, whereas in the above MAC.APP. 33/...
Suman Chadha and Another vs.central Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONTEMPT APPEAL (CIVIL) No.3/2017 Reserved on :8. h March, 2018 Date of decision:27. h September, 2018 SUMAN CHADHA AND ANOTHER .....Appellants Through Mr. Atul Kumar Sharma, Advocate. Versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anuj Jain, Advocate for Central Bank of India. Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP alongwith Mr. Philomon Kani, Ms. Kriti Handa, Ms. Hansika Sahu and Ms. Damini K, Advocates for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Suman Chadha and Komal Chadha, husband and wife, have preferred the present appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (the Act, for short) challenging the order dated 18th July, 2017 passed by the learned single Judge in Contempt Case (C) No.531/2015 filed by the Central Bank of India, the respondent before us.2. The impugned order holds the two appellants guilty of contempt of court for wilful disobedience and non-compli...
Umesh Verma vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 5684/2014 and Crl. M.A. 19437-19438/2014 UMESH VERMA ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ruchir Batra, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Amit Kumar Mr. Prasanjit Keswani and Mr. RAghvendra Pratap Singh, Advocates for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand was filed invoking the inherent power of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) to pray that the proceedings arising out of the first information report (FIR) no.3of police station Saraswati Vihar (the correct police station is Subhash Place as shown by the copy of the FIR appended at page 48 of the paper book) lodged by the third respondent involving offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) be quashed, it being in the nature of gross abuse of the ...
M/S Shree Rajmoti Industries vs.m/s Shri Vishwaprabha Food Products Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27th September, 2018. + CS(COMM) 397/2018 M/S SHREE RAJMOTI INDUSTRIES ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar & Mr. Vinay (M- Kumar Shukla, Advocates 9810438450). versus M/S SHRI VISHWAPRABHA FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD Through: None. ..... Defendant CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CS(COMM) 397/2018 and I.A. 10672/2014 (for stay) The present suit for permanent injunction seeks restraint on 1. infringement of trademark, passing off, etc. The Plaintiff claims to be the owner of the trademark RAJMOTI, which was adopted by it in the year 1962. The word RAJMOTI is used as a trademark in a distinctive logo form and as a word mark, in respect of edible oils including groundnut oil and cotton seed oil. The Plaintiff has expanded the product range into mineral and aerated waters, beers, non-alcoholic drinks, fruit drinks, juices, syrups, etc. The word RAJMOTI is also an essential and significant feature of ...
Shyam Kumar Srivastava and Ors vs.lt Governor and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~63 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. h September, 2018 SHYAM KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ORS Through: Mr.Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate. ........ Petitioners + W.P.(C) 412/2016 versus LT GOVERNOR AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sangita Rai, Mr.Pradeep Tomar and Mr.Kumud Ray, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advs for LAC/L&B. Mr.Ajay Digpaul, Advocate for SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to 5 biswas land of the petitioners admeasuring 250sq. yards, comprised in Khasra No.286 situated in the revenue estate of Village Tihar, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabi...
k.s. Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.life Insurance Corporation of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~59 & 60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 1278/2001 K.S. CHAUDHARY & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra, Advocate with and Mr. Yashaswi Chouksey Mr.Shantanu Jugtawat, Advocates. versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate for LIC. Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department with Mr. Aditya Khamparia and Mr. Amar Panwar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 7574/2008 AND RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Advocate for Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocate. versus SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate for LIC. INSURANCE Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department with Mr. Aditya W.P.(C) 1278/2001 & 7574/2008 Page 1 of 13 Khamparia and Mr. Amar Panwar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC...
M/S Universal Cables Limited vs.rameshwara Jute Mills Limited and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~89 & 90 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) 294/2017 M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Adv with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Megha Gupta and Mr Sangram Singh, Advs versus RAMESHWARA JUTE MILLS LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Rajeev Virmani, Sr Adv with Mr Neeraj Chaudhari, Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Akash Sharma, Advs FAO(OS) 295/2017 UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Adv with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Megha Gupta and Mr Sangram Singh, Advs JUTE INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED & ORS....Respondents versus Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Adv with Mr Rishi Aggarwal and Ms Aarushi Tiku, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) At joint request of learned counsels for the parties, the present appeals are called to court and listed. FAO (OS) 294/2017 & 295/2017 Page 1 of 2 In view of the orders p...
Pramjeet Kaushik & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2018 CRL.M.C. 4695/2018 PRAMJEET KAUSHIK & ORS ........ Petitioners STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sajan K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja,, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Rajvir Singh Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2609.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.139 of 2011 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that parties have entered into a settlement before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 13.04.2018. As per the settlement, the petitioner No.1-husband has agreed to 3. CRL.M....
Ritu Sharma vs.rajbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 09.2018 + FAO(OS) 144/2018 RITU SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Sharma with Ms. Dezy Gaur, Advs. versus RAJBIR SINGH Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO RAJENDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. 39790/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 144/2018 1. This appeal filed by the appellant/defendant No.1 under Section 10 of Delhi High Court Rules read with Order 43 Rule 1 CPC calls in question tenability of the order dated 23.08.2018 passed in CS(OS) 2888/2015, whereby an application for grant of injunction has been allowed. On going through the detailed order passed by the learned Court on 23.08.2018, we find that the appellant and her counsel were present before the Court on 23.08.2018 on the basis of advance notice served on them and without admitting the averments made in the application, t...
Ranu Enterprises & Anr. Vs.malanpur Captive Power Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 18/2017 RANU ENTERPRISES & ANR. Through: Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Adv. Date of Decision:26. 9.2018 ........ Petitioners versus MALANPUR CAPTIVE POWER LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Surender Kumar Gupta, Mr. Prashant Rawat and Ms. Priya Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is directed against the order dated 6.12.2014 passed by the learned Arbitrator.2. By virtue of this order, the learned Arbitrator terminated the arbitration proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 25 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 1996 Act).3. It may be noted that the learned Arbitrator upon his appointment had fixed the first sitting in the matter on 20.11.2013. 3.1 On that date, the learned Arbitrator, inter alia, fixed a schedule for filing the pleadings. 3.2 In particular, the petitioner was given time to file the statement of claim on or before 14.12.2013...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »