Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Swami Ramdev vs.juggernaut Books Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :17. 09.2018. Date of decision :29.09.2018. + CM(M) 556/2018 & CM APPL. 19354/2018 SWAMI RAMDEV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul and Mr. Dayan Krishanan, Sr.Advs. with Mr.Rohan Ahuja and Mr.Simranjeet Singh, Ms. Sonali Dhir, Advocates Versus JUGGERNAUT BOOKS PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Adv., Mr. Satyajit Sarna and Ms.Pallavi Srivastava, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Amit Aggarwal and Ms.Aanchal Timani, Advocates for R-2 Mr.Vishal Rao, Adv for R-3 Ms. Shilpa Gamnani, Adv. for R-4. Ms.Kruttika Vijay and Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal, Advocates for R-5 AND CM(M) 556/2018 & 557/2018 Page 1 of 211 CM(M) 557/2018 & CM APPL. 19356/2018 SWAMI RAMDEV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul and Mr.Dayan Krishanan, Sr.Advs. with Mr.Rohan Ahuja and Mr.Simranjeet Singh, Ms. Sonali Dhir, Advocates. versus PRIYANKA PATHAK NARAIN & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS...
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Vs.indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 128/2017 & IA122522017 Reserved on:26. 09.2018 Date of decision :28. 09.2018 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr.Dhirendra Negi, Mr.Ananya Kumar and Ms.Pragya Chauhan, Advs. versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr.V.N. Koura and Ms.Paramjeet Benipal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The present order seeks to adjudicate on a limited dispute that has been raised by the parties at this stage of the execution of the Arbitral Award.2. The Arbitral Tribunal by its Award dated 18.05.2017 had passed the following directions adjudicating the disputes between the parties:411. In the premises following reliefs are granted:1. It is declared that IOCL's claim for Price Discount is unjustified and contrary to the terms of the Contract.2. IOCL is ordered to pay the withheld/ deducted amount of Rs. 115,11,28,129/- to L&T along with simple interest at the rate of OMP (Enf.)(Comm.)...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.deepak Arora & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: September 28, 2018 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr Pankaj Seth, Advocate. .....Appellant + MAC.APP. 320/2013 Versus DEEPAK ARORA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kartik Rai, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. + MAC.APP. 336/2013 1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr Pankaj Seth, Advocate. Versus .....Appellant PHOOL KUMARI & ORS. Through: Nemo. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals arise out of separate Awards of even date i.e. 11th February, 2013, vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of `7,10,448/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to legal heirs of a Supervisor-Rajeev, aged 42 years, in a vehicular accident which took MAC.APPs.320/2013 & 336/2013 Page 1 of 8 place on 27th October, 2008.2. In this unfortunate accident in question, a driver-Deepak, aged 25 years, was grievousl...
Devashish Banerjee & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28.09.2018 CRL.M.C. 4976/2018 DEVASHISH BANERJEE & ORS. STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Vasundhara Bhardwaj and Mr. G. Johri, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Dharmendra Kumar. : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2809.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 33179/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4976/2018 1.... Petitioners seeks quashing of FIR No.219 of 2017 under Sections 498A/406 of the IPC read with Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes and they have started residing together amicably. CRL.M.C. 4976/2018 ...
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.virender Rajoria & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2569/2015 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP, with Mr. Prateek Kumar versus VIRENDER RAJORIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner / Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had registered first information report (RC no.1996/E/006 of CBI/SIU-X, New Delhi) on the basis of some information on 31.12.1996 concerning, inter alia, the offences of cheating by use of forged documents allegedly pursuant to criminal conspiracy in which certain public servants were involved to cause wrongful loss to Oriental Bank of Commerce, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. The investigation resulted in final report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) being submitted seeking prosecution, inter alia, of the two respondents, they having been described ...
r.s.singhvi & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h September, 2018 Decided on:28. h September, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 1704/2018 and CRL.M.A. 28309/2018 R.S.SINGHVI & ANR ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal and Mr. Aditya Singhla, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State. ACP Arvind Yadav and Insp. Joginder Singh, Crime Branch. Ms. Rebecca M John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishal Gosain, Mr. Kushdeep Gaur, Mr. R. Tyagi, Mrs. Nicy Paulson & Ms. Megha Bahl, Advocates for Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By this petition, petitioners, who are parents of Mayank Singhvi, husband of deceased Anissia Batra seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.185/2018 under Section 304B IPC registered at PS Hauz Khas, Delhi.2. The above noted FIR was registered on the complaint of Smt. Nillum Batra, mother of Anissia Batra stat...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.suresh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 28, 2018 + MAC.APP. 437/2013 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr A.K.Soni, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SURESH KUMAR & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr M.K.Sinha, Advocate for R-1. + MAC.APP. 828/2013 SH SURESH KUMAR Through: Mr M.K.Sinha, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SH JAIBIR SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr A.K.Soni, Advocate for Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals arise out of impugned Award of 1. 17th December, 2012, vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of `34,95,700/- to a Chowkidar-Suresh, aged 45 years, who was grievously injured in a vehicular accident which took place on 10th July, 2010. The Tribunal has granted interest @ 9% per annum on `3,44,100/- while MAC.APP. 437/2018 MAC.APP. 828/2018 Page 1 of 7 excluding interest on future medic...
Abhinav Jain & Ors vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1126/2018 ABHINAV JAIN & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Joshi, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State Dr. Sharat Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 25.11.2007. In 2014, she lodged first information report (FIR) no.24with police station Shakarpur, alleging offences punishable under Sections 406, 498A, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (first petitioner), his mother (second petitioner) and his father (third petitioner). On conclusion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet, the same being pending on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate. Crl. M.C. No.1126/2018 Page 1 of 9 2. The parties were referred to the Delhi Mediation Centre at K...
Ravinder & Ors vs.state Govt of Nct Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4968/2018 Judgment delivered on:28. 09.2018 RAVINDER & ORS STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.Ghanshyam Mishra, Adv. Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, Addl. PP for the State. Ms.Cheema Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2809.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.42 of 2011 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Naraina, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a MOU dated 25.03.2015. Parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce, passed on 13.12.2017. CRL.M.C. 4968/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. As per the settlement, a sum of Rs. 50,000/- was agreed to be paid. A sum of ...
Suman Devi & Anr vs.mahesh Arora & Anr (Reliance General Insurace Co L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h September, 2018 $~32 * % + MAC.APP. 1114/2017 SUMAN DEVI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.D. K. Sharma and Mr. Palvinder versus Singh, Advocate MAHESH ARORA & ANR (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURACE CO LTD ) ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mudita Sharda and Ms. Gayatri Nandwani, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the Claims Tribunal dismissed their claim petition.2. On 24th October, 2014 at about 07:30 P.M., Varsha Rani and Neha Batra were travelling in a car bearing No.DL-1CN-7636 driven by Vinav Arora. The driver lost control over the car near Siwah, G. T. Road, Panipat, Haryana and the car hit against an electric pole which resulted in the death of the driver, Vinav Arora and injuries to Neha Batra and Varsha Rani. An electric wire from the electric pole fell on Varsha Rani when s...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »