Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Forum for Media and Literature and Anr. Vs.db Corp Ltd. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:03. 07.2018 Pronounced on:28. 09.2018 FAO (OS) 93/2018 & C.M. APPL.23811/2018 FORUM FOR MEDIA AND LITERATURE AND ANR. Through: Sh. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Sh. Kotla Harshavardhan, Ms. Mansi Sood, Sh. Nizam Pasha and Sh. Nishoonk Matroo, Advocates. Appellants Versus D.B. CORP. LTD. AND ORS. .Respondents Through: Sh. Sajan Poovayya and Sh. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Advocates with Sh. Biju Mattam, Ms. Aastha Chawla, Ms. Ankita Bafna, Sh. Priyadarshi Banerjee and Sh. Pratibhanu. S. Kharola, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted to the learned Single Judge who shall consider the question of grant of interim relief on the basis of the pleadings and contentions of the parties. Parties shall be present before the concerned learned Single Judge, on 3rd October, 2018.2. For deta...
Ranjeet Mishra vs.priyanka Bhatia & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~70 & 81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 10186/2018 & CM APPL.39682/2018 VARINDER KUMAR GANDHI AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Raman Gandhi with Ms. Harsha Sharma, Advs. versus MS PRIYANKA BHATIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv. for R-3 & R-4 ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10335/2018 & CM APPL.40321/2018 RANJEET MISHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raman Gandhi with Ms. Harsha Sharma, Advs. versus PRIYANKA BHATIA & ORS Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv. for R-3 & R-4 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO RAJENDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. 40322/2018 in W.P.(C) 10335/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10186/2018 & W.P.(C) 10335/2018 Page 1 of 2 W.P.(C) 10186/2018 & W.P.(C) 10335/2018 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we find that instead of challenging the order passed by the De...
Ms. Stadtmueller Gabriele (German National) vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:28. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 9294/2018 & C.M. No.Nos.35958-60/2018 MS. STADTMUELLER GABRIELE (GERMAN NATIONAL) versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Pandey and : Mr. Salil Ahuja, Advocates. : Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with : Mr. T. P. Singh, Advocate for UOI. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction JUDGMENT1 The petitioner a German National has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 30.07.2018 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no.2 [Joint Secretary (foreigners division, MHA) & Appellate Authority]. rejecting the petitioners application for review of the order dated 28.09.2017.2. The petitioner is, essentially, aggrieved by the decision of the Central Government denying the petitioners request to be granted citizenship by natur...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7 vs.the Basti Sugar Mills Compan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.205/2018 Date of decision:28. h September, 2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Shahrukh Ejaz, Advocate for Income Tax Department. versus THE BASTI SUGAR MILLS COMPANY LIMITED..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ['Act' for short]., in the case of The Basti Sugar Mills Company Limited, ['respondent-assessee' for short]. relates to the Assessment year 1999-2000 and arises from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ['Tribunal']. dated 18th August, 2017.2. This is second round of litigation. By the order dated 24th November, 2010 passed by the Delhi High Court in ITA No.1248/2007 the issue of disallowance of Rs. 1,50,04,133/- under Section 36(1...
Shahid Azad vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~82. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h September, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10341/2018 & C.M.No.40331/2018 (stay) SHAHID AZAD Through: Versus... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr.Harsh Ahuja, Mr.Kushal Kumar, Mr.Vibhu Tripathi, Mr.Abhishek Kaushik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice (Oral) 1. Challenge in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is made to the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance, 2018 and a mandamus is sought to declare the entire ordinance as ultra vires the Constitution. The petitioner claiming to be a practicing advocate has approached this Court to challenge the ordinance in question on the ground that it adversely affects his fundamental rights besides affecting the rights of citizens of this country, the ordinance runs contrary to the shared beli...
Mandeep Sehrawat & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4963/2018 Judgment delivered on:28. 09.2018 MANDEEP SEHRAWAT & ANR. STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Vivek Luthra, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Narender Singh, P.S.Vasant Kunj (S) Mr. J.S.Arya, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. JUDGMENT2809.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 33122/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4963/2018 & Crl.M.A.33123/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.167 of 2016 under Section 354/354B/5of the IPC registered at Police Station Vasant Kunj South, Delhi.2. Subject FIR is an offshoot of matrimonial dispute between the CRL.M.C. 4963/2018 Page 1 of 3 families of the petitioners as well as respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.1 is the son-in-law of respondent No.2 and petitioner No....
Bronx Process Engineering Private Limited (Vol. Liqn.) Vs...........
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~CP-29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:28. 09.2018 + CO.PET.20/2018 BRONX PROCESS ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED (VOL. LIQN.) Through: Ms. Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. on behalf of ................. Petitioner the Official Liquidator CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL) for Members Voluntary Winding up of the Company BRONX PROCESS ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED (herein referred to as the said company) from the date of filing of the present petition.2. The said Company was incorporated under the name - Metal Processing Engineers Private Limited on 17.02.1995 having Corporate Identity Number U00349KA1995PTC017223 under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies, Bangalore.3. Later, the name of the said Company was changed from Metal Processing Engineers Private Limited to Bronx Process Eng...
Inter Ikea Systems Bv vs.annanya Gautam & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Shwetasree Majumder, Advocate with Ms. Tanya Varma, Advocate. CS(COMM) 1089/2018 INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV18$~ * + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ANNANYA GAUTAM & ANR. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. T. Sundar Ramanathan, Advocate with Ms. Kumudavalli S., Advocate. Date of Decision:28. h September, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 11355/2018 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts, damages and delivery up. The prayers sought in the present injunction application are as under:-"(a) Restrain the defendants, their employees, servants, agents and all others in active concert or participation with them from manufacturing/selling/advertising/ importing or in any other way dealing in goods and providing services under the mark IKAH or any other mark which amounts to an infringement CS(COMM) 1089/2018 Page 1 of 13 of the IK...
Laik Ahmad @ Acchey & Ors vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28.09.2018 CRL.M.C. 3306/2018 LAIK AHMAD @ ACCHEY & ORS ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr.Prakash Verma, Advocate. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State with SI Jitender, P.S.Welcome. Mr.Arun Kumar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2809.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.279 of 2014 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered at Police Station Welcome Colony, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes before the Principal Judge, Karkardooma Courts, , CRL.M.C. 3306/2018 Page 1 of 3 Delhi on 15.01.2018. Parties have already been divorce...
Jaintia Highway Pvt. Ltd vs.national Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-28-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:28. 09.2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 36/2017 JAINTIA HIGHWAY PVT. LTD .Petitioner Through Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Shally Bhasin, Mr.Karan Lahri, Mr. Vaibhav Niti, Mr. Chaitanya Safaya and Ms.Shruti Garg, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through Mr. Ragvesh Singh, Adv. JAYANT NATH, J.(JUDGMENT) 1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking to impugn the Award dated 7.10.2016. A tender was floated by the respondent for construction work of two laning of Jowai- Meghalaya/Assam Border section of NH-44 (Km 69.2 to Km 173.2) to be executed on DBFOT Pattern i.e. Design Build Finance Operate and Transfer Basis. One Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. was declared the successful bidder and a Letter of Award was issued in its favour on 20.3.2012. The Letter of Award required formation of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) by Simp...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »