Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Skyline Engineering Contracts (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.centex International Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:18. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h September, 2018 + ARB.P. 200/2017 SKYLINE ENGINEERING CONTRACTS (I) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner and Through : Mr.Jeevesh Nagrath Mr.Chitvan Singhal, Advocates. versus CENTEX INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.K.Ghosh, Ms.Tina Garg, Mr.Rohit Dutta and Mr.Mohinder Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The petitioner has filed the application under Section 11 (6) and Section 11 (8) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) for appointment of the arbitrator to adjudicate the claim of the applicant against the respondent on the following facts: (a) the Architect of the Respondent, namely M/s. Pratap Parikh Associates, had issued a tender for the work of the Respondent along with the terms of the articles of the agreement and conditions of contract. The Applicant submitted its bid to the Archi...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.fertilizers Association of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h September, 2018 + LPA3712016 & CM Nos.21841/2018 (delay), 21842/2018 (stay) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Mr.Sahil Sood, Mr.Kunal Dubey, Mr.Sachin Sinha, Advs. Versus FERTILIZERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arvind K. Nigam, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Adv. along with Ms.Kaveeta Wadia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice (Oral) 1. Seeking exception to orders dated 12th November, 2014 and 16th December, 2015 passed by the writ Court in W.P.(C) No.3050/2012, this appeal has been filed by the Union of India and there is a delay of 522 days in filing of the appeal. Apart from the aforesaid delay, it is seen that the respondents herein filed the writ petition and sought a direction to the Union of India and the concerned Department in the Ministry to include or recogni...
M/S Chadha Brothers Thr Its Proprietor S K Chadha vs.poonam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 27, 2018 (i) + MAC.APP. 754/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates Versus NEERAJ & ORS. (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Respondents (ii) + MAC.APP. 756/2017 & CM302262017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant Versus SHIVRAJ & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate (iii) + MAC.APP. 762/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant MAC. APPs. 754/2017, 756/2017, 762/2017 & 764/2017 Page 1 of 6 Versus POONAM & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate (iv) + MAC.APP. 764/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant Versus NISHA & ORS. Through: Mr. J.P.N. S...
M/S the Rameshwara Jute Mills Limited vs.m/s Universal Cables Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~85 & 86 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 212/2018 M/S THE RAMESHWARA JUTE MILLS LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajeev Virmani, Sr Adv with Mr Neeraj Chaudhari, Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Akash Sharma, Advs versus M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Adv with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Megha Gupta and Mr Sangram Singh, Advs for R-1 FAO(OS) (COMM) 213/2018 JUTE INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Adv with Mr Rishi Aggarwal and Ms Aarushi Tiku, Advs versus IDBI CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LIMITED & ORS.... Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Adv with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Megha Gupta and Mr Sangram Singh, Advs for R-4... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) FAO (OS) (Comm) 212/2018 & 213/2018 Page 1 of 6 1. The present appeals are directed against the order passed by the l...
Parul Bhatnagar vs.medical Council of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 9855/2018 PARUL BHATNAGAR Petitioner Through: Sh. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. T. Singhdev, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle Biathansangi Das, Sh. Tarun Verma and Sh. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates, for MCI. Sh. Sanjib Kumar Mohanty with Sh. Amit Acharya, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. + W.P.(C) 10077/2018, C.M. APPL.39300-39301/2018 AMRITHA SANKAR THROUGH : AR Petitioner Through: Sh. Viraj Kadam, Advocate. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ..Respondents Through: Sh. T. Singhdev, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Sh. Tarun Verma, Ms. Puja Sarkar and Ms. Michelle Biathansangi Das, Advocates, for MCI. Ms. Monika Arora with Sh. Vibhu Tripathi, CGSC and Sh. Harsh Ahuja, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. T...
Madan Lal vs.central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
#79 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. 09.2018 W.P.(C) 8765/2017 & CM APPL.35891/2018 MADAN LAL ........ Petitioner versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Apurb Lal and Ms. Meenu Pandey, Advocates : Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"(i) Direct the respondent to make correction in name of the parents in terms of the school record in the certificates of class 10th and 12th and issue fresh certificates along with mark sheet after correction. Pass appropriate direction against the respondent to (ii) W.P.(C) 8765/2018 Page 1 of 4 pay cost for compelling the petitioner to file the petition before this Honble Court for their mistake. (iii) Call for the records of the case. (iv) Pass any other and fur...
Pannalal Rathore & Anr vs.m/s w.h. Deeth (Ballabgarh) & Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h September, 2018 + FAO(OS) 41/2018 PANNALAL RATHORE & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Ms.Anjali J.Manish, Adv. Versus M/S W.H. DEETH (BALLABGARH) & CO. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Ripu Adlakha, Adv. with Mr.Kunal Sinha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice (Oral) C.M.No.9653/2018 (delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the application is condoned and the application is disposed of. FAO(OS) 41/2018 2. This appeal filed by the plaintiffs/appellants under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act calls in question the tenability of an order dated 15th January, 2018 passed by the learned Single Bench in O.A.No.7/2018 whereby the right of FAO(OS) 41/2018 Page 1 of 3 the Appellant to lead evidence has been closed. Even though the learned counsel made various s...
M/S Chadha Brothers vs.neeraj & Ors. (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 27, 2018 (i) + MAC.APP. 754/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates Versus NEERAJ & ORS. (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD) Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Respondents (ii) + MAC.APP. 756/2017 & CM302262017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant Versus SHIVRAJ & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate (iii) + MAC.APP. 762/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant MAC. APPs. 754/2017, 756/2017, 762/2017 & 764/2017 Page 1 of 6 Versus POONAM & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate (iv) + MAC.APP. 764/2017 M/S CHADHA BROTHERS THR ITS PROPRIETOR S K CHADHA Through: Mr. S.K.Sharma & Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates .....Appellant Versus NISHA & ORS. Through: Mr. J.P.N. S...
Anil Shere vs.choyang Health Care India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~22 to 24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Decided on:27. h September, 2018 CRL.M.C. 4943/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33054/2018 ANIL SHERE Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD ... Respondent Through: None CRL.M.C. 4944/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33055/2018 ANIL SHERE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD .... Respondent Through: None CRL.M.C. 4945/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33056/2018 ANIL SHERE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Crl. M.C. No.4943-4945/2018 Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions arise out of proceedings relating to three different criminal complaint cases (CC635817, 63and 6357/17) which were brought before the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate by the respondent company each alleging offences punishable under ...
Rajni Anand vs.cosmic Structures Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~CP-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:27. 09.2018 + CO.PET. 152/2016 RAJNI ANAND Through... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus COSMIC STRUCTURES LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.D.Bhattacharya, Adv. for OL. Mr.Pramod Kalirana, Mr.Pankaj Mehta, Ms.Shweta Soni and Mr.R.K.Mehta, Advs. for applicant in A77322018 & 7689/2018 Mr.S.K.Bhatia, Adv. for applicant in CA3812018 Mr.D.Bhattacharya, Adv. for OL with Mr.Ravi Kumar Metta, Asst.OL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CA10252018 1. This application is filed by Mr.Chandra Shekhar who is said to have booked a commercial space in one of the projects of the respondent company seeking appropriate orders for transferring of the present petition to NCLT. The applicant states that he has also moved an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 before NCLT on which NCLT on 25.5.2018 has passed orders appointing IRP (Interim Resolution Professional). He...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »