Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shekhar Arora vs.ram Kripal Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2018 RSA No.143/2018 SHEKHAR ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Srivastava & Mr. Arvind Pandey, Advs. Versus RAM KRIPAL YADAV Through: None.... RESPONDENTCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.39756/2018 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. stay) and CM RSA No.143/2018, CM No.39755/2018 No.39757/2018 (for condonation of delay of 50 days in re-filing the appeal) (for 3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 8th March, 2018 in RCA No.61853/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-06, Central]. only partly allowing the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant / defendant against the judgment and decree [dated 30th April, 2016 in Civil Suit No.45/2013 of the Court of Civil Judge-04, Central]. allowing the...
Mahesh Chander Sharma vs.chameli Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.813/2018 + % MAHESH CHANDER SHARMA26h September, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Advocate with Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advocate, Ms. Apporva Bahl, Advocate and Mr. Pawas Aggarwal, Adovate (M. No.9811154651). CHAMELI DEVI & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.889/2018 1. No one appears for the caveators. Caveat stands discharged. C.M. Nos.39438-39/2018(exemption) 2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. RFA No.813/2018 page 1 of 11 +RFA No.813/2018 and C.M. No.39437/2018(stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 17.04.2018 by which trial court has decreed the suit for partition filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff/mother with respec...
Shashi Cables Ltd. Vs.directorate General of Foreign Trade (Dgft) and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10193/2018 & C.M. No.39734/2018 SHASHI CABLES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pramod Singh, Adv. with Mr.Anmol Stephen, Adv. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE (DGFT) AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms.Kriti Awasthi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2609.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning orders dated 23.02.2016, 06.09.2016 and 06.07.2017 (the impugned orders). By the impugned order dated 23.02.2016, the Policy Relaxation Committee (hereafter PRC) constituted in terms of Paragraph 2.57(b) of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) of the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) rejected the petitioners application for the second extension of validity of the Duty Free Import Authorisation on the ground that the petitioner was unable to establish a case of genuine hardship. By the impugned order date...
M/S Agarpara Company Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 2133/2017 & CM APPL. 10304/2017 M/S AGARPARA COMPANY LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Purti Marwaha, Ms. Henna George and Ms. Shakil Ahmed, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Ms.Eshita Baruah, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Avneesh Garg and Mr. Atanu Mukherjee, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Ashok Kumar Jain, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner had pursuant to the previous order filed an affidavit stating the matters in which one of us (S. Ravindra Bhat, J) had recused. It appears from the affidavit that in two orders relating to M/s Agarpara Jute Mills Ltd. [W.P.(C) 1345-1348/2016, W.P.(C) 1356/2016, W.P.(C) 3465/2016 and W.P.(C) No.5980/2018]. one of us (S. Ravindra Bhat, J) had expressed, at some stage, reservations and recused...
In the Matter of Pastor Securities Limited (In vol.liqn.) Vs.......... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~CP-55 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No.19/2018 IN THE MATTER OF PASTOR SECURITIES LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) ..Petitioner Through Ms. Sangeeta Chandra, Advs. for OL. Date of decision:26. 09.2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking voluntary winding up of the Company PASTOR SECURITIES LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) (herein referred to as the said company) from the date of filing of the instant petition.2. on The said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act 11.01.1995 having Corporate Identity Number U67120DL1995PLC064264 with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi & Haryan having its registered office situated at IInd Floor, 10 Nehru Bazar, Panchkuian Road, New Delhi - 110055.3. The said Company was having authorized share capital of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Lacs) divi...
Sh. Suresh Mishra vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26.09.2018 CRL.M.C. 4842/2018 SH. SURESH MISHRA versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Meena Jha, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State. SI RM Ashangsomatai, PS Patel Nagar. Mr. Shashank Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2609.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.32673/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4842/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.386/2016 under Sections 323/341/3IPC, Police Station Patel Nagar, based on a settlement. Crl.M.C.4842/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Parties are neighbours. It is alleged that on a trivial issue there was an altercation between the parties and the petitioner is alleged to have misbehaved with the complainant.3. Learned ...
Satya Narayan Prasad vs.election Commission of India Through : Secreta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 10198/2018 & CM APPL. 39778-80/2018 SATYA NARAYAN PRASAD ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner in person. versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA THROUGH : SECRETARY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.R. Chopra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO RAJENDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPLs. 39778/2018 & 39779/2018 (both for exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. Both the applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 10198/2018 & CM APPL. 39780/2018 1.... Petitioner claiming to be a public spirited person has filed this writ petition in public interest and the prayer made in the writ petition reads as under: 1. Directing the Honble Election Commission to hold the constitutional elections, the losers of the Lok Sabha (Lower House) / Legislative Assembly elections should be instructed to declare the disqualification for the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) elections for...
Phool Wati Gupta and and Others vs.union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 8253/2016 Date of Judgment:26. h September, 2018 PHOOL WATI GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr S.K. Rout and Mr Aman Mehrotra, Advs versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Siddharth Panda, Adv for LAC Mr Nikhil Rohatgi and Mr Shashank Khurana, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to 24 bighas and 18 biswas land of the petitioners comprised in khasra Nos. 6(1-0), 7(1-0), 54(1-5), 57(0-5), 58(0-4), 59(0-6), 60(0-5), 204 & 244(1-0), 236/2/2(4-03), 239(1-11), 240(2-17), 241(2-11), 242(3-18), 246(1-0), 247(1-0), 293/190(1-7) and 294/190(1-7) situated in the revenue estate of Village Shakarpur Khas, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') are deemed to have lapsed in v...
Shamim Akhtar vs.dinesh Chand & Anr (Bajaj Allianz General Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 26, 2018 + MAC.APP. 347/2018 SHAMIM AKHTAR .....Appellant Through: Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate Versus DINESH CHAND & ANR (BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) .....Respondents Through: Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Ms. Suman Bagga, advocate for respondent No.2 + MAC.APP. 616/2018 & C.Ms. 26742/2018 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Ms. Suman Bagga, advocate Versus SHAMIM AKHTAR & ANR. Through: Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) C.M. 13662/2018 in MAC. APP. 347/2018 There is delay of 271 days in filing the accompanying appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned. MAC.APPs. 347/2018 & 616/2018 Page 1 of 7 The application is disposed of. C.M. 26744/2018in MAC. APP. 616/2018 There is delay of 174 days in filing the accompanying appeal. For the reasons sta...
Rajender vs.yogender Tyagi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h September, 2018 Decided on:26. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 953/2018 RAJENDER Represented by: Mr. M.M. Singh ..... Appellant and, Mr.Prashant Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus YOGENDER TYAGI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.S.Satyanarayan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21st September, 2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in CC No.5363titled as Rajender v. Yogender Tyagi, whereby the complaint preferred by the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short NI Act) was dismissed and the respondent/accused was acquitted.2. Brief exposition of the facts in the complaint are that the respondent approached the appellant for a friendly loan of 3,00,000/-. Appellant acceded to the request of the respondent and advanced him the aforesaid loan amount. To discharge the liability, respondent issued cheque bearing numb...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »