Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.gurdev Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 27, 2018 + MAC.APP. 33/2018 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate Versus + MAC.APP. 311/2018 GURDEV SINGH & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. R.K.Nain, Advocate GURDEV SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K.Nain, Advocate Versus RAMSHRAY YADAV & ORS (M/s RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO ) .....Respondents Through: Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 24th November, 2017 grants compensation of `12,72,000/- with interest @9% per annum to Gurdev Singh (hereinafter referred to as the Injured), aged 37 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 13th August, 2009.2. In the above captioned first appeal, M/s Reliance General Insurance Company (henceforth referred to as the Insurer) seeks reduction in the quantum of compensation awarded, whereas in the above MAC.APP. 33/...
Rajesh Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs.senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~59 & 60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 1278/2001 K.S. CHAUDHARY & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra, Advocate with and Mr. Yashaswi Chouksey Mr.Shantanu Jugtawat, Advocates. versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate for LIC. Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department with Mr. Aditya Khamparia and Mr. Amar Panwar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 7574/2008 AND RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Advocate for Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocate. versus SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate for LIC. INSURANCE Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department with Mr. Aditya W.P.(C) 1278/2001 & 7574/2008 Page 1 of 13 Khamparia and Mr. Amar Panwar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC...
Shahul Hameed k.s. And Ors. Vs.medical Council of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 8091/2018, C.M. APPL.30989-30991/2018 SHAHUL HAMEED K.S. AND ORS. Petitioners Through: Sh. Prashanto Sen, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Viraj Kadam and Sh. Kaustubh Singh, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. T. Singhdev, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle Biathansangi Das, Sh. Tarun Verma, Sh. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates, for MCI. Sh. Jaswant Rai Aggarwal and Sh. Vikrant Goyal, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. + W.P.(C) 9855/2018 PARUL BHATNAGAR Petitioner Through: Sh. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. T. Singhdev, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle Biathansangi Das, Sh. Tarun Verma and Sh. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates, for MCI. Sh. Sanjib Kumar Mohanty with Sh. Amit Acharya, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. + W.P.(C) 100...
Sandeep Kalra & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~47. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h September, 2018 + LPA5532018 & CM Nos.39958/2018, 39960/2018 SANDEEP KALRA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Shyam Moorjani, Adv. with Mr.Rajeev Narayan, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice (Oral) C.M.No.39959/2018 (exemptions) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. LPA5532018 2. Seeking exception to orders dated 4th September, 2018 and 12th September, 2018 passed by the learned writ Court in W.P.(C) No.9292/2018. This appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The writ petition was filed by the Appellants impugning an order dated 30th August, 2018 passed by the Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs LPA5532018 Page 1 of 4 and Sports, Government of India by which the claim of the appellants to include them in the Indian co...
Universal Cables Limited vs.jute Investment Company Limited and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~89 & 90 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) 294/2017 M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Adv with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Megha Gupta and Mr Sangram Singh, Advs versus RAMESHWARA JUTE MILLS LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Rajeev Virmani, Sr Adv with Mr Neeraj Chaudhari, Ms Saakshi Agrawal and Mr Akash Sharma, Advs FAO(OS) 295/2017 UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Chidambaram, Sr Adv with Ms Kanika Singh, Ms Megha Gupta and Mr Sangram Singh, Advs JUTE INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED & ORS....Respondents versus Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Adv with Mr Rishi Aggarwal and Ms Aarushi Tiku, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) At joint request of learned counsels for the parties, the present appeals are called to court and listed. FAO (OS) 294/2017 & 295/2017 Page 1 of 2 In view of the orders p...
M/S Kic Food Products Private Limited vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: September 27, 2018 CM(M) 1288/2016 & C.M. 46217/2016 M/S KIC FOOD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S.Chandhiok & Mr. J.P.Sengh, Senior Advocates with Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh, Ms. Deepali Datta, Mr. Angad, Ms. Mrigna Shekhar & Mr.Vivek Mathur, Advocates Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ....Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is the Licensee of respondent since the year 1982. It is not in dispute that the said license was renewed/ extended from time to time till 31st December, 2010. A Show Cause Notice of 20th September, 2016 (Annexure P-14) was served upon petitioner to file objections and to produce evidence in support of said objections. A reply thereto, was filed by petitioner in September, 2016. On 23rd November, 2016, parties were directed to file the list of witnesses and evidence and issue wit...
Hemant Tyagi vs.uco Bank & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h September, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8500/2016 HEMANT TYAGI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Ankit Mehta, Adv. versus UCO BANK & ORS. Through : None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. There has been default in appearance on the part of the respondentBank yesterday as well as today, though the case was called out twice on each occasion. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length, and proceed to decide the writ petition.2. This writ petition assails the communication dated 17th May, 2012, issued to the petitioner by the respondentBank (hereinafter referred to as the Bank), to the extent the said communication requires payment, by the petitioner of ` 2 lakhs, stated to be bond money for leaving the services of the Bank before completion of two years. The terms of the letter of appointment of the petitioner, dated 11th August, 2011, have been invoked by the Bank, to su...
Shakuntla Devi & Ors vs.dev Anand & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h September, 2018 RSA3422015 SHAKUNTLA DEVI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand and Mr. Varun K. Bala, Advs. Versus Through: R-1 in person. DEV ANAND & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil ........ RESPONDENTS Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 2nd July, 2015 in RCA No.(Unique ID No.02401C0237222012) of the Court of Additional District Judge (Central)]. of dismissal of First Appeal preferred by the three appellants namely (i) Shakuntala Devi, (ii) Mukesh, and (iii) Dinesh against the judgment and decree [dated 25th April, 2012 in Suit No.of 1987 of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge]. allowing the suit filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff for recovery of possession of immovable property and for mesne profits.2. This appeal came up before this Court first on 16th September, 2015 when notice thereof wa...
Rajeev Singhal & Anr vs.mcd (East Delhi Municipal Corporation) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :12. h September, 2018 Pronounced on :27. h September, 2018 + LPA3792017 RAJEEV SINGHAL & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Uday Gupta with Ms. Shivani Lal, Mr. Hiren Dasan and Mr. M.K. Tripathi, Advocates versus MCD (EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagdish Sagar, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Manish Srivastava and Ms.Moulshree Shukla, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT RAJENDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE1 Seeking exception to an order passed by the learned writ Court in W.P.(C) 6349/2014 dismissing the petition filed, claiming compensation on account of death of appellants 14 year old son, Master Akshat Singhal, this appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.2. Appellants herein are the parents of Master Akshat Singhal, a 14 year old boy, who was victim of an unfortunate incident that occurred in the evening of 05.07.2014 w...
Radio Next Webcastion Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5893/2018 & C.M. No.22982/2018, 32754/2018 RADIO NEXT WEBCASTION PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sagar Chandra, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr.Siddharth Singh & Mr.Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2709.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an Administrative Order dated 16.05.2018 (impugned order) passed by the Registry of Intellectual Property Appellate Board (hereafter the Appellate Board) declining to place the petitioners application filed under Section 31D of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter the Copyright Act) before the Appellate Board. The impugned order indicates that the petitioners application is declined on the ground that there is no technical member (copyright) to place the application before the Appellate Board and, therefore, till such time that a tech...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »