Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amit @ Vicky vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 301/2018 Judgment delivered on:03. 04.2018 AMIT @ VICKY ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr S.K.Nanda Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State. SI Karamvir, PS Narela. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0304.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has filed the status report in the Court today. The same is taken on record.2.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.775/2014 under Sections 302/307/3IPC & 25/25(54)/Arms Act, Police Station Narela.3. The allegations against the petitioner - Amit @ Vicky are that the petitioner along with co-accused Vijay, two friends both named Praveen, Jaspreet and Arun sought to abduct the complainant. It is alleged that the deceased Praveen caught hold of the complainant while co-accused Vijay BAIL APPLN....
Director of Income Tax (Exemption) vs.the Delhi Public School Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 03.2018 Pronounced on:03. 04.2018 ITA10862005 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) ..... Appellant versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ITA5212008 ITA5012008 + + + + W.P.(C) 5340/2008 ITA6052008 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX DELHI versus ..... Appellant THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY, DPS STAFF FLATS ........ Petitioner versus UOI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ITA10862005 & connected matters Page 1 of 31 + + ITA6092008 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION ..... Appellant versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent ITA14322010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent Present : Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, Ad...
State Bank of India vs.ravinder Kumar (Through: Legal Heirs)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 03, 2018 W.P.(C) 5798/2017 & CM241392018 STATE BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv K. Tyagi, Advocate versus RAVINDER KUMAR (THROUGH: LEGAL HEIRS) .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo ORDER (ORAL) Impugned Award of 19th September, 2016 grants `46,315.32/- with interest @10% per annum with costs towards leave encashment of 84 days of privilege leave due to deceased-workman on the date of his removal from service i.e. 22nd January, 2001.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that workman-Ravinder Kumar was removed from service by way of punishment and after delay of seven years, the claim petition had been filed. It is submitted that in a case of removal from service, leave encashment is not payable. To submit so, attention of this Court is drawn to petitioner-Banks Circular of 8th July, 2015 (Annexure P-10).3. Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned Award and the materia...
Satya Pal Batra vs.d.d.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 08, 2018 Judgment delivered on: April 03, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1671/2013 SATYA PAL BATRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Choudhary, Ms. Rubina and Mr. Azharuddin Choudhary, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus D.D.A. Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms. Raveena Tandon, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"In the premises aforesaid, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to issue:-"a) A writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the case for perusal; b) A Writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the action on the part of the Respondent DDA Firstly, in not mutating & transferring, for all W.P.(C) No.1671/2013 Page 1 of 19 in this regard till date despite purposes, in favour of the...
Aveena Milk Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner Employees Compensation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:03. 04.2018 W.P. (C) 3153/2018 AVEENA MILK PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anup Trehan and Mr.Akarsh Bhalla, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R-1. Mr.R.K. Nain, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CAV2482018 Shri R.K.Nain, Advocate appears for respondent No.2/victim and as such the caveat is discharged. CM APPL. 12524/2018 (Exemption) Exemptions granted subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) 3153/2018 Page 1 of 3 CM APPL. 12523/2018 (Stay) This application is not pressed at this stage as learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be filing stay application before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation. Application is dismissed as withdrawn. W.P.(C) 3153/2018 1. Respondent No.2/victim ha...
Eternity Footwear Ltd. (Formerly Known as Diamond Product Ltd.) vs.the ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 138/2018 & IA42664267/2018 ETERNITY FOOTWEAR LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIAMOND PRODUCT LTD.) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S.K. Ray, Mr S.P. Sausan and Ms Neetika Chaturedi, Advocates. versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Pradeep Gaur and Mr Himanshu Joshi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0304.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the 1. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, impugning the arbitral award dated 03.11.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) to the limited extent that the Arbitral Tribunal has awarded interest at the rate of 15% per annum on the sum of 2,96,59,810/- from 05.05.2010 till 12.12.2010.2. According to the petitioner, the said interest ought to have been awarded from 18.04.2010, that is, 30 days after the receipt of the O.M.P.(COMM) 138/2018 Page 1 of 6 Surveyors rep...
Delhi Public School Society, Dps Staff Flats vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 03.2018 Pronounced on:03. 04.2018 ITA10862005 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) ..... Appellant versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent And connected matters: + + + + W.P.(C) 5340/2008 + + ITA5012008 ITA5212008 ITA6052008 ITA6092008 ITA14322010 Present : Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, Adv. for appellant in ITA Nos.1086/2005, 501/2008, 521/2008, 5340/2008, 609/2008 & 1432/2010. Mr.Puneet Rai, Adv. for appellant in ITA No.605/2008. Mr.M.S.Syali, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Satyen Sethi, Mr.Arta Trana Panda, Mr.Mayank Nagi, Ms.Gargi Sethee and Mr.Mohit Jhamb, Advs. for respondent in ITA Nos.1086/2005, 501/2008, 521/2008, 605/2008, 609/2008 & 1432/2010 and for the petitioner in ITA No.5340/2008. Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI in ITA No.5340/2008. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Page 1 of 2 The assessees writ petition (Writ Petition (Civil) No.5340/2008) is allowed ...
M/S Liugong India Pvt Ltd vs.state ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.No.4877/2015 Judgment reserved on :8. h March, 2018 Date of decision :3. d April, 2018 M/S LIUGONG INDIA PVT LTD Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Adv. versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS..... Respondent Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. Mr. S.L. Gupta, Adv. for R-2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner M/s. LiuGong India Pvt. Ltd. through its authorized signatory Mr. Ashok Kumar seeks the setting aside of the impugned order dated 08.10.2015 of the learned MM-06, South East, Saket Courts, Delhi in CC No.157/1/12 whereby the application filed by the complainant i.e. the present petitioner seeking revival of the complaint which was returned on 14.05.2015 in view of the directions of the Honble Apex Court in case titled as Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra Cr. Appeal No.2287 of 2009, 2014 (3) Law Herald 2697 (SC) in ...
Icici Home Finance Co Ltd vs.binod Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:14. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:03. d April, 2018 + CS(COMM) 763/2018 & I.A. 20441/2014 ICICI HOME FINANCE CO LTD ..... Plaintiff and Through : Mr.Gautam Singhal Mr.Naveen Kumar, Advocates. BINOD KUMAR & ANR ..... Defendants Through : None being ex parte. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit against the defendants for recovery of 1,21,95,003/- with interest @ 24% pa for permanent injunction, infringement of trademark, passing off, damages, dilution, rendition of accounts against the defendants.2. The plaintiff alleges to be a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at ICICI Towers, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400051 and its Branch Office at 2nd Floor, Videocon Tower, Jhandewalan Extn., New Delhi. It is engaged in the business of providing finance facilities to its customers for the purchase...
Radhey Shyam vs.prem Wati & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. d April, 2018 + RFA9212016 & CM APPL. 27797/2017 (stay) RADHEY SHYAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mahmood Hasan, Advocate. versus (M:9810756377) PREM WATI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate. (M:9999777847) for DDA/R-9. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. None appears for Respondent Nos.1 to 8 despite service. By the impugned judgment and decree dated 13th October, 2016, the property bearing no.752-S, Scooter Market, Jheel Khuranja, Delhi (hereinafter `suit property') has been directed to be sold through public auction and the parties have been directed to be entitled to 1/8th share. Despite service, none appeared for Respondent Nos.1 to 8. It is noticed from the order sheets that for many hearings Respondent Nos.1 to 8 have not been appearing. Accordingly, they are proceeded ex-parte.2. The present appeal assails the impugned judgement and decree dated 13th Octobe...