Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Prakash Atlanta Jv vs.national Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h April, 2018 + O.M.P. (ENF)(COMM) 124/2016 & I.A. Nos.12601/2016, 4843/2017, 11752/2017, 15308/2017 M/S PRAKASH ATLANTA JV ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Chirag M.Shroff, Ms.Neha Sangwan and Mr.Nikunj, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vikas Goel, Mr.Abhishek Kumar and Ms.Arushi Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking enforcement of the Arbitral Award dated 12.02.2007 read with corrected Award dated 02.04.2007 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes between the parties in relation to the Contract Agreement dated 10.08.2001 for the work of construction of segment of Lucknow Bypass connecting N.H. 25 and N.H. 28 via N.H. 56 passing through Lucknow City in the State of Uttar Pradesh.2. The only dispute left with respect to the execution...
Sushil Harrison vs.the Principal, St. Stephen College & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 8296/2016 & CM343332016 SUSHIL HARRISON .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P.C. Jha, Advocate versus THE PRINCIPAL, ST. STEPHEN COLLEGE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2 Ms. Isha Mital and Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Advocates for respondent No.3-UGC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Learned counsel for petitioner submits that since respondent- College has already made appointment on the post of Library Attendant, therefore, this petition is not pressed. However, a prayer is made that petitioner may be permitted to continue as Office Attendant on contract basis in the respondent-College.2. Learned counsel for respondent-College submits that petitioners employment as Office Attendant on contract basis is not being ended.3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that regarding ...
Punjlloyd Ltd. Vs.indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 649/2017 & IA No.15001/2017 PUNJLLOYD LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr Yamian Kumar, Mr Shashank Bhan Sali, Ms Manisha Mehta, Ms Vaishali Tanwar, Ms Mrigna Shekhar, Advocates. versus .....Respondent Through: Mr Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Advocate with Mr Ammit Mgharia, Ms Tannishtha Singh, Ms Ayushi Gupta, Ms Rishita Mall, Advocates. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0404.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying that an arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with the Contract Agreement dated 23.06.2008 (hereafter the Agreement). The Agreement includes an arbitration clause. Clause 9.1.0.0 of the General Conditions of Contract in the Agreement is relevant and is set...
M/S Bhatia Propcon Pvt Ltd vs.ashok Mehta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:04. h April, 2018 + CS(COMM) 928/2016 M/S BHATIA PROPCON PVT LTD ASHOK MEHTA Through : Ms.Rachna Agrawal, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus ..... Defendant Through : Mr.Atul Bandhu, Advocate with defendant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.CRL.M.A. 6100/2016 1. This application is moved by the plaintiff under Section 340 Cr.P.C. read with Section 209 of Indian Penal Code. The plaintiff has filed the suit for specific performance of Agreement to Sell dated 03.09.2012 in respect of defendant's half share in property bearing No.Z- 26, Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi, ad-measuring 250 sq.yds. with proportionate rights in the land underneath, with possession of the ground floor and two rooms on the barsati floor alongwith other common portions. CS(COMM) No.928/2016 Page 1 of 7 2. The defendant had filed his written statement on 21.10.2014, allegedly making the false clai...
Power Grid Corporation of India vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:04. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 1461/2013& CM Nos.2767/2013, 2961/2013 & 20639/2017 POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr Pawan Upadhyay, Mr S. Upadhyay, Mr Rajesh Chhetri, Mr Appoorv Tripathi and Mr Srinivasan Ramaswamy. :Ms Pinky Anand, ASG, Mr L. D. Joshi, Standing Counsel, EDMC and Mr Sudhamani, Advocates for R-1/EDMC Ms Madhu Tewatia, Advocate for Intervener. + W.P.(C) 1372/2014& CM No.22981/2015 WITH DELHI TRANSCO LTD. ........ Petitioner versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner :Mr S. K. Dubey, Mr Rajmangal Kumar and Mr Farhan Ahmed Chazi. W.P.(C) 1461/2013 & other connected matters Page 1 of 23 For the... RESPONDENTS :Ms Pinky Anand, ASG, Mr L. D...
Suman Khanduja vs.the New India Assurance Co Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 8278/2017 SUMAN KHANDUJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.A. Sharma and Mr. Prem Chand, Advocates versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD AND ORS Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash, Mr. Kunal Gosain and Mr. Utsav Jain, Advocates .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Communication of 16th December, 2016 rejects petitioners application for voluntary retirement by observing that petitioner had not attained the age of 55 years before applying for voluntary retirement and hence, she was not eligible for voluntary retirement and her application for voluntary retirement was treated as one for resignation and instead of granting voluntary retirement, petitioner is treated to have resigned on 7th November, 2016. On the said date i.e. 7th November, 2016, petitioner was informed by respondent vide Communication (Annexure P-6) that she stood relieved from service on 7th Novem...
Liberty Videocon Gen Ins Co Ltd vs.guddi Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~20 * % + MAC.APP.96/2018 & CM No.2970/2018 Date of Decision:04. h April, 2018 LIBERTY VIDEOCON GEN INS CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus GUDDI DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.Kamra, Adv. for R1 to R6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.40,62,880/- has been awarded to the respondents 1 to 6.2. The accident dated 12th November, 2015 resulted in the death of Prem Pal. The deceased was aged 45 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his father, widow, three minor sons and an unmarried sister who claimed compensation before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was self- employed in the transport business having income of Rs.2,70,923/- per annum.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.2,70,923/- per annum on the basis of Income Tax Returns, added 30% towards future prosp...
In the Matter of Simco Scientific Instruments Marketing Co. Ltd. Vs... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~CP-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:04. 04.2018 + CO.PET.76/2008 & C.A5952017 IN THE MATTER OF SIMCO SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS MARKETING CO. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Megha Bharara, Adv. for Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petition is filed under section 433(e), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act), for winding up of Simco Scientific Instruments Marketing Co. Ltd. (in liquidation) (herein referred to as the said company).2. It is stated that the OL was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator by the order of this court dated 13.05.2010 in the said company and the same was ordered to be wound up by order dated 14.10.2014. Citations were published in the leading newspapers and in the Delhi Gazette.3. It is further stated that in compliance of the order dated 09.02.2016 passed by this court an application being C....
Krishan Kant Pandey vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 624/2018 KRISHAN KANT PANDEY ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State W/SI Madhvi Bi. Mr Praveen Goswami CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0404.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.17/2018 under Sections 376/354A IPC, Police Station Madhu Vihar.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner came in contact with the prosecutrix through Facebook in the year 2014. Thereafter, they started conversing with each other over telephone. As per the prosecutrix, on a promise to marry, the prosecutrix was asked to join the petitioner at Agra. Thereafter, it is contended, that they started living together. It is alleged that on the promise to marry, physical relati...
Green Infra Wind Energy Limited vs.regen Powertech Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~34 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB. A. (COMM.) 17/2018 Date of decision:4. h April, 2018 GREEN INFRA WIND ENERGY LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Amarjeet Singh Chandhok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Kapil Arora and Ms.Aditi Tambi, Advs. versus REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Jain, Sr. Adv. with Through Mr.Gopal Mr.Jayant K.Mehta, Mr.Anush Raajan and Mr.Rahul Kukreja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) Cav.255/2018 Since the learned counsel for the respondent has appeared on advance notice, the Caveat stands discharged. IA No.4353/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB. A. (COMM.) 17/2018 1. This is an appeal challenging the order dated 15.03.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in Arbitration Case No.1 between the parties.2. The Arbitral Tribunal by way of its Impugned Order has directed as under: ARB. A. (COMM.) 17/2018 Page 1 17. The Tribunal directs that the FDR deposited with the Registrar Genera...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »