Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar @ Jhabru vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 2 + ASHOK KUMAR @ JHABRU CRL.A. 305/2002 ...Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal with Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State... RESPONDENTSTATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER0204.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 2nd January 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.24/1998 arising out of FIR No.298/1997 registered at Police Station (PS) Chanakya Puri, convicting the Appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence of the same date sentencing him to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. The charge against the Appellant was that at around 12.45 pm on 28th September 1997, near Service Road, Bapu Dham Telephone Depot, Jhuggi, Indira Camp, the Appellant murdered the dece...
Adani Global Pte. Ltd. Vs.mmtc Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:02. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 127/2018 ADANI GLOBAL PTE. LTD. Versus MMTC LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Mr Vikram Nankani, Senior Advocate with Mr Arpan Behl and Mr Avinash Tripathi. :Mr Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr Akhil Sachar and Ms Priyanka Puri. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (AGPL), a company registered under the laws of Singapore, has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, impugning an arbitral award dated 29.09.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal) comprising of three arbitrators Sh D.P. Wadhwa, Sh R.C. Lahoti and Sh Deepak Verma, former judges of the Supreme Court of India.2. The impugned award was rendered in the context o...
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.mahesh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:02. d April, 2018 $~8 * % + MAC.APP. 283/2017 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P. Jain, Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Mr. Abhijit Chakrauarty, Advocates. versus MAHESH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Mishra, Advocate for with along no.1 respondent respondent no.1 in person. Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate as amicus curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.2,77,676/- has been awarded to respondent no.1.2. On 15th January, 2011 at about 10.30 PM, respondent no.1 was riding on his motor cycle in front of Bata showroom on way to Hakikat Nagar Crossing from Batra Cinema Road when he was hit by Honda City Car No.DL-7CF-1742 driven by respondent no.2.3. Respondent no.1 suffered a fracture of femur right (Grade Type IV) and other grievous injuries. Respondent no.1 was operated f...
Daya Chand & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~16 * + W.P.(C) 9888/2015 DAYA CHAND & ORS. Through: Mr.A.K.Trivedi & Mr.Naveen Kumar Advocates ........ Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI Through: Mr.Rahul Sharma & Mr.C.K.Bhatt, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS % ORDER0204.2018 1. W.P.(C) 9888/2015 has been taken up today, as 29.03.2018 was declared a court holiday.2. This is the second round of litigation by the petitioners seeking their regularization with retrospective effect from 16.05.1989, which has been declined by the Central Administrative Tribunal inter alia on the ground that in W.P.No.253/1988, the direction of the Supreme Court dated 31.10.1988, which was modified vide order dated 16.11.1988, was limited to the extent that the respondent was directed to formulate a scheme of regularization of persons similarly placed as the petitioners therein, within six months from the date of passing of W.P.(C) 98...
Rajender Singh @ Raju Mental vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 422/2017 RAJENDER SINGH @ RAJU MENTAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State Inspector Anant Kiran, PS-Sabji Mandi CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER0204.2018 $~1 * + % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 10th November 2016 passed by the learned Special Judge-2, NDPS Act (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.47/2013 arising from FIR No.40/2013, registered at Police Station (PS) Subzi Mandi, convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 IPC and order on sentence of the same date whereby he was sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for one month. Case of the prosecution 2. The case of the prosecution is ...
Charu Verma vs.jitendra Verma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~33 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"2nd April, 2018 CM (M) 483/2016 CHARU VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Kr. Singh, Adv. versus JITENDRA VERMA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Varun Bhati & Ms. Rhea Gandhi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the plaintiff of the civil suit (CS1172014) which is pending before the Additional District Judge, the respondents herein being the defendants, the prayer being for decree for possession and recovery of damages qua the premises described as shop No.A-3, Sanatan Dharam Mandir (Saat Manjila), Tilak Nagar, New Delhi 110018 as shown in red colour in the site plan (page 26 of the paper book). The site plan would show that the shop comprises of two portions each with dimensions of 10 feet x 20 feet one at the ground floor and the other at the first floor. The petitioner (plaintiff of the case) is the wife of the first respondent (first defendant of the case), the se...
Amr India Ltd. Vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 553/2017 and IA No.15547/2017 AMR INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Arvind Kumar Gupta and Bhardwaj, Prashant Mr Advocates. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Through: Ms Biji Rajesh and Ms Eshita for Mr ........ RESPONDENTS Baruah, Advocates Gaurang Kanth, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0204.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter AMR) has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying for an order restraining respondent no.2 (Bank of Maharashtra) from releasing any amount pursuant to invocation of the Bank Guarantee (Bank Guarantee bearing No.BOM/0387/BG/1056/10-11) dated 22.11.2011 furnished by AMR to respondent no.1 (hereafter SDMC).2. On 23.03.2010, SDMC issued a notice inviting bids for the OMP(I)(COMM.) 553/2017 Page 1 of 10 work of improvement of road of 60 feet ROW and above...
Ferrero Spa & Nr vs.m/s Ruchi International & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:02. d April, 2018 CS(COMM) 76/2018 FERRERO SPA & NR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms.Vaishali Mittal, Mr.Siddhant Chamola, Ms.Vrinda Gambhir, Advocates. M/S RUCHI INTERNATIONAL & ANR ..... Defendants Through: None being ex-parte. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for declaration, permanent injunction, infringement of trademark, passing off, damages, dilution, rendition of accounts against the defendants.2. At the outset, it is to be noted during pendency of the suit, plaintiffs and defendant No.1 had entered into a settlement and a compromise decree was passed against the defendant No.1 vide order dated 26.05.2016. As regards defendant No.2 it is to be mentioned that despite service none appeared on its behalf as is mentioned in the order dated 09.05.2014 and the suit proceeded against defendant No.2. Though there is no specific order...
Solanki Girish vs.uoi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~45 * + W.P.(C) 7772/2017 SOLANKI GIRISH IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vishal Chaudhary, Advocate. versus UOI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Bharathi Raju, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Devender Singh, AC/CISF. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER0204.2018 The petitioner was recruited in the CISF as Constable/GD on % 1. 06.03.2010. On completion of his basic training, he was posted to CISF6h RB Deoli on 01.09.2010. Thereafter he had reported to the CISF Unit, Red Fort, Delhi on 01.09.2012, on a regular transfer.2. On 08.07.2015, at about 0630 hours, central PT was organized in the Unit. While checking the turnout of the personnel participating in the PT, the Company Commander found the petitioner to be present in full pants instead of the prescribed uniform. When the petitioner was questioned by the Company Commander as to the reason for reporting for PT in full pants, he entered into an argument with hi...
Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.good Media News Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
F-53 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1161/2016 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. K.K. Khetan, Advocate versus GOOD MEDIA NEWS PVT. LTD. Through: None. Date of Decision:02. d April, 2018 ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, mandatory injunction, damages and rendition of accounts. The prayers made in the plaint are reproduced hereinbelow:-""i. Pass an order of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their officers, servants, agents, partners and representatives and all others acting for and on their behalf from either engaging in themselves or from authorizing the recording, distributing, broadcasting, public performance/communication to the public or in any other way exploiting the cinematograph films, sound recordings and/or literary works (lyrics) and Musical CS(COMM) 1161/2016...