Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Public School Society vs.dps World Foundation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h April, 2018 CS(COMM) No.154/2016, IA No.6764/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC), IA No.7261/2017 (under Section 135(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC), IA No.6759/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule-2A CPC) & IA No.7920/2017 (under Order I Rule 10 CPC). DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Bhuvan Gugrani and Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advs. Versus DPS WORLD FOUNDATION & ANR. ...Defendants Through: Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Adv., Mr. Rahul Dubey, Ms. Girija Verma, Advs. along with defendant no.2 in person Mr. Salman Khurshid. Mr. Aadil Singh Boparai, Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal and Mr. Zafar Khurshid, Advs. for Intervener Applicant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit to restrain the defendants from using the name Delhi Public School, DPS and the ...
Dal Chand vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~3 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1337/2013 4 + 5 + MANISH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CRL.A. 1369/2013 DAL CHAND Through: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra and Mr. Syed Meesam, Advocates ..... Appellant versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CRL.A. 716/2014 RAJ KISHORE STATE Through: Ms. ..... Appellant Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Crl.A. Nos. 1337/2013, 1369/2013 & 716/2014 Page 1 of 18 % JUDGMENT0504.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 8th July, 2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North West-II, Rohini Courts in Sessions Case No.63/2013 arising out of FIR No.179/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Adar...
Alok Tripathi vs.competition Commission of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : April 5, 2018 W.P.(C) 11893/2015 & CM No.33490/2016 ........ Petitioner ALOK TRIPATHI Through: Mr. A K Bhardwaj, Advocate versus with petitioner in person COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pallav Saxena with Ms. Bindu Das, Advocate W.P.(C) 10099/2017 ........ Petitioner ALOK TRIPATHI Through: Mr. A K Bhardwaj, Advocate versus with petitioner in person COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Pallav Saxena with Ms. Bindu Das, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER (ORAL) 1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above- captioned two petitions have been heard together and are being decided W.Ps.(C) 11893/2015 & 10099/2017 Page 1 of 7 by this common order.2. In the above double-captioned petitions, petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of representations made against adverse Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (hereinafter referre...
Mohit Chawla vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 675/2018 MOHIT CHAWLA versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr Jawahar Chawla Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State SI Neetu. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0504.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Nominal Roll of the... Petitioner has been received. The same is taken on record.2.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.453/2017 under Sections 376-D/365 IPC, Police Station K.N.Katju Marg.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the subject case. BAIL APPLN. 675/2018 Page 1 of 3 4. The allegations in the FIR are that the victim, who had come to Delhi from Calcutta, was abducted by about four individuals at 10:30 pm when she had stepped out of her sisters house to go to the market. The accused are a...
Sulekh Agarwal vs.m/s Shiv Astha Construction Company Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~2 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 110/2017 % Date of decision :5. h April, 2018 SULEKH AGARWAL Through : Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Adv. ..... Appellant versus M/S SHIV ASTHA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD Through : Mr. Sameer Rohatgi, ..... Respondent Mr. Namit Suri and Mr. Akshit Pradhan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 Four petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act being Arbitration Petition Nos. 476, 209, 210, 211/2015 as well as four petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act being OMP Nos. 352, 353, 354, 355/2012, separately filed by the appellant with three other persons stand rejected by a FAO(OS)No.110/2017 Page 1 of 7 common order dated 16th January, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge.2. So far as the present appeal is concerned, it assails the aforesaid common order dated 16th January, 2017 so far as OMP No.355...
Alpha Services vs.ircon International Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 238/2016 & IA No.5634/2016 ALPHA SERVICES ........ Petitioner Versus IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Ms Neelima Tripathi and Ms Gunjan Singh. :Ms Leena Tuteja, Mr Ishaan Chawla and Ms Diksha Bhatia. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (hereafter Alpha) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 23.12.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the contract entered into by the parties, whereby Alpha had agreed to supply 35 numbers of Electric Overhead Travellin...
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 15/2018 & IA No.408/2018 AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr Pallav Pandey, Mr Sharad Sharma and Mr Tanmay nandi, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr Shiv Kumar, Advocate. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0504.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying as under:-"A. Restrain the Respondent, its principal officers, servants, agents, and any other and all others acting for and on their behalf from acting on its letters dated 29.12.2017 and 9.1.2018. B. Restrain the Respondent, its principal officers, servants, agents, and any others acting for and on their behalf from encashing the Bank Guarantee No.003GM07160900013 dated 30.3.16. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 15/2018 Page 1 of 9 C. Restrain ...
Societe Des Produits Nestle s.a & Anr vs.shree Shankeshwar Utensils & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h April, 2018. CS(COMM) 106/2018 SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manish Kr. Mishra and Ms. Akansha Singh, Advs. Versus SHREE SHANKESHWAR UTENSILS & APPLIANCES PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Amit Jain and Ms. Saltanat, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Advs. IA No.15670/2014 (of the plaintiffs under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999).1. The counsel for the plaintiffs/applicants and the counsel for the defendant have been heard.2. The plaintiffs/applicants, claiming to be the registered proprietor of the trade mark MAGGI, have instituted this suit to restrain the defendant from infringing the said mark by using the mark MAGGI in respect of pressure cookers.3. The suit was entertained and vide ex parte ad interim order dated 3rd August, 2010, an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark MAGGI was granted. This injunction is continuing though...
Hsil Ltd vs.maruti Ceramic and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~1 to 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 841/2016 & IAs No.8281/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 4433/2017 (u/O VIII R-1 CPC), 14401/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) & 14402/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) HSIL LIMITED Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus ALTRA CERAMIC AND ORS Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. ..... Defendants + CS(COMM) 842/2016 & IAs No.8302/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 14399/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) & 14400/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) AND + HSIL LTD Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus MARUTI CERAMIC AND ORS Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. ..... Defendants AND CS(COMM) 844/2016 & IAs No.8315/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 14403/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) & 14404/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) HSIL LIMITED Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus ..... Defendants SAFFRON CERA ...
Pashupati Nath Shah (Deceased by Lr) vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 434/2002 PASHUPATI NATH SHAH (Deceased by LR) Through: Mr. D.K.Mathur, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State ..... Respondent $~5 * + STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER0404.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 2nd March 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.175/1996 arising from FIR No.107/1995, registered at Police Station (PS) Dabri, convicting the Appellant for the offences under Sections 376 and 302 IPC. The appeal is also against the order on sentence dated 10th April 2002 whereby for the offence under Section 376 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for one month; and for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced ...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »