Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bank of Baroda vs.priyanka Sodhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"3rd April, 2018 CM(M) 570/2017 & CM No.19579/2017 BANK OF BARODA + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRIYANKA SODHI & ORS ORDER (ORAL) versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Joshi with Mr. Deepak Sahni, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yashvir Singh Kadian, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Inderjit Singh, Advocate for R-3.1. The impugned orders with which the petitioner is aggrieved were passed on the file of civil suit presently registered as CS No.429305/12, it having been presented in August, 2012 seeking recovery of Rs.4,34,000/- with interest against the respondents who were impleaded as defendants. Concededly, an education loan was taken by the second respondent (second defendant) for purposes of the course of study (Bachelor of Dental Surgery) pursued by his daughter, i.e. the first respondent (first defendant), the third respondent (third defendant) being the guarantor. The banks case is that there wa...
Sh. Shyam vs.motilal Nehru College (Evening) w.p.(c) No.3607/2017 & Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
Advocates for R-3 Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Mr.Prang Newmai and Ms.Slomita Rai, Advocates for DU W.P.(C) 8239/2017 ........ Petitioner JAMIL MALIK Through: Mr.S.K.Tyagi, Advocate + $~16, 17 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of order : April 03, 2018 W.P.(C) 3607/2017 & CM No.15853/2017 VIKAS SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Bhardwaj and Mr.Nishant Prateek, Advocates versus MOTILAL NEHRU COLLEGE (EVENING) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sumit Rajput and Mr.Amresh Mathur, versus MOTILAL NEHRU COLLEGE (EVENING) UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar and Mr.Abhinav Sharma, Advocates for R-2 W.P.(C) 3158/2018 & CM Nos.12530-32/2018 + SH. SHYAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Siddhant Srivastava, Advocate versus MOTILAL NEHRU COLLEGE (EVENING) W.P.(C) No.3607/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Mr.Prang Newmai and Ms.Slomita Rai, Advocates for DU CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUST...
Somwati (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs. Vs.rameshwar Yadav @ R S Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:03. d April, 2018 RSA382018, CM. Nos. 7844-45/2018 SOMWATI (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate. Versus RAMESHWAR YADAV @ R S YADAV .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) This Second Appeal impugns an order of the First Appellate Court dated 31.05.2017 as well as the order dated 23.01.2018 in Review Petition upholding the order/judgment and the decree of the Trial Court dated 27.07.2016. A Civil Suit seeking possession and damages from the appellant/defendant was filed by the respondent for an unauthorized occupation of the suit premises. The respondent/plaintiff had claimed absolute ownership of 160 sq. yards land carved out of Khasra No.485, Tughlakabad, New Delhi. He claimed exclusive use and occupation of the entire building except a small portion of the rear of the ground floor, which was alleged to be in the unaut...
Radhey Shyam Gupta vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :16. 03.2018 Date of decision :03. 04.2018 LPA2852017 and CM APPL. 14646/2017 RADHEY SHYAM GUPTA Through : Ms. Vanddana Gupta, Adv. ..... Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra and Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.1. Aggrieved of the order dated 22.02.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby, the writ petition seeking directions to the respondent to allot an MIG flat at Dwarka was dismissed, the appellant has preferred the appeal in hand.2. The relevant facts are that the appellant got registered with the respondent (hereafter "DDA") for allotment of an MIG flat under IVth Registration Scheme on New Pattern, 1979 for allotment of flats to low and middle income registrants, under MIG, LIG and LPA2852017 Page 1 of 8 Janta Categories o...
State (Gnct of Delhi) vs.anoop Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :3. d APRIL, 2018 CRL.L.P. 9/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.76/2018 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP. ........ Petitioner versus Through : None. ANOOP SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG ..... Respondent + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present leave petition has been preferred by the State to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 17.03.2017 whereby the respondent Anoop Singh has been acquitted of the charges for commission of offences punishable under SectionsIPC in case FIR No.16/2016 registered at Police Station Dwarka Sector-23.2. I have heard the learned APP and have examined the file. The FIR was lodged on the complaint of the prosecutrix X (assumed name) aged around 35 years on 07.01.2016 when she reported sexual assault upon her in a park after administering stupefying substance by the respondent who was known to her. The prosecution examined eleven witnesses to establish its case. In 313 Cr.P....
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.sweka Power Tech Engineers Pvt Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 265/2017 & IA Nos. 8096/2017 & 8098/2017 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Biji Rajesh, Ms Eshita Baruah and Mr Diwankar Sethi, Advocates for Mr Gaurang Kanth, Advocate. versus SWEKA POWER TECH ENGINEERS PVT LTD & ORS. Through: Mr Gaurav Sarin, Mrs Charul and Mr Abhishek ........ RESPONDENTS Sarin Manchanda, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0304.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (South Delhi Municipal Corporation hereafter SDMC) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, impugning an arbitral award dated 24.02.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by the Sole Arbitrator, Justice R.C. Chopra, a former Judge of this Court. The impugned award was rendered in the context of the disputes that had arisen in connection with the Work Order No.01...
Krishan Gopal Bakshi vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 28, 2018 Judgment delivered on: April 03, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4288/2014 KRISHAN GOPAL BAKSHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kundan Kumar, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Akshita Manocha and Ms. Kajri Gupta, Advs. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers: (a) (b) Issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to allot any Janta flat to the petitioner at the cost prevalent in February 1996. Pass such order or further order(s) as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The facts as noted from the writ petition are, the petitioner herein got registration under New Pattern Registration W.P.(C) No.4288/2014 Page 1 of 16 Scheme, 1979 of DDA for allotment of a Janta flat vide Registra...
Jamil Malik vs.motilal Nehru College (Evening) University of Delhi & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
Advocates for R-3 Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Mr.Prang Newmai and Ms.Slomita Rai, Advocates for DU W.P.(C) 8239/2017 ........ Petitioner JAMIL MALIK Through: Mr.S.K.Tyagi, Advocate + $~16, 17 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of order : April 03, 2018 W.P.(C) 3607/2017 & CM No.15853/2017 VIKAS SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Bhardwaj and Mr.Nishant Prateek, Advocates versus MOTILAL NEHRU COLLEGE (EVENING) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sumit Rajput and Mr.Amresh Mathur, versus MOTILAL NEHRU COLLEGE (EVENING) UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar and Mr.Abhinav Sharma, Advocates for R-2 W.P.(C) 3158/2018 & CM Nos.12530-32/2018 + SH. SHYAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Siddhant Srivastava, Advocate versus MOTILAL NEHRU COLLEGE (EVENING) W.P.(C) No.3607/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Mr.Prang Newmai and Ms.Slomita Rai, Advocates for DU CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUST...
Tarif vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL03 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 141/2018 & Crl.M.B.292/2018 TARIF Through : Mr.Ravindra Narayan with Mr.Afzal Khan and Mr.Raghav Narayan, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. SI Deepak Kumar, PS Sunlight Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner- Tarif to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 2.2.2018 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in CA No.279/2017 by which conviction and sentence recorded by the learned trial court by orders dated 29.05.2017 and 30.05.2017 respectively under Section 279/304-A IPC were upheld. The petitioner was convicted by the trial court by a judgment dated 29.05.2017 for commission of offences Crl.Rev.P.141/2018 Page 1 of 6 punishable under Sections 279/304-A IPC. By an order dated 30.05.2017, he was sentenced to u...
Peacock Tours Private Limited & Anr. Vs.farooq Ahmed Shala & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~CP-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:03. 04.2018 + CCP(CO.) 2/2017 PEACOCK TOURS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR......... Petitioners Through Mr. Kumar Abhishek Rao, Mr.Shailesh Kumar, Ms. Bhavya Bharti and Ms.Sonal Nagpal, Advs. versus FAROOQ AHMED SHALA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Arun Saxena and Ms.Priya Verma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent/contemnor for committing contempt of order dated 29.04.2016 passed in Co.A(SB) 13/2016 by wilfully disobeying the same.2. It is the case of the petitioners that the respondent is the husband of petitioner No.2.... Petitioner No.2 filed a complaint under the Protection of Women and Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the concerned M.M., Saket. During the proceedings, for putting an end to their personal differences and settling all the disputes, the parties i.e....
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »